以木兰林管局八英庄林场拐磨沟流域的林相图、遥感影像及二类调查数据为基础,利用ArcGIS10.0进行图形及数据处理分析。一级景观分类中,总斑块数为8个斑块,景观总面积为342.76 hm2,其中有林地占景观总面积比例最大;斑块形状指数和分维数最大的为未成林地,较小的是裸沙滩;斑块密度最大的为有林地,最小的是未成林地和裸沙滩;破碎度最大的是裸沙滩,最小的为有林地;景观多样性指数为0.57,最大多样性指数为0.92,相差较大,均匀度为0.62,一级景观分类斑块分布较不平衡。二级景观分类中,斑块总数合计为19块,其中在有林地中,占总景观面积最大的为落叶松林;斑块形状指数和分维数较大的为桦树林,较小小的为山杨林;斑块密度最大的为落叶松林,最小的为山杨林;破碎度最大的为山杏林,最小的为桦树林;二级景观分类景观多样性指数为0.79,最大多样性指数为0.89,两者相差不大,而且均匀度为0.89接近1,因此该流域二级景观分类斑块分布比较平衡。
Based on the forest map,remote sensing image and the date of forest resource survey in Bayingzhuang forest farm,Mulan Forestry Administration,processing and analysis of date were accomplished by using ArcGIS10.0,combined with principle and method of landscape ecology.According to the first-level landscape classification,Guaimogou valley was divided into 8 patches.The total area of Guaimogou was 342.76 hm2,the proportion that forest land accounted for of the total area was the largest.The largest patch shape index and fractal dimension was not into the forest,the smallest was nude beach.The largest porosity index was forest land,the smallest was not into the forest and nude beach. The largest fragmentation was nude beach and the smallest was forest land.The landscape diversity index was 0.57,and the largest diversity index was 0.92.They have a lot of difference.The evenness index was 0.62 that means the first-level landscape is imbalance.According to the second-level landscape classification,Guaimogou valley was divided into 19 patches.For the forest land,the proportion that larch forest accounted for of the total area was the largest.The largest patch shape index and fractal dimension was birch forest,the smallest was poplar forest.The largest porosity index was larch forest,the smallest was poplar forest .The largest fragmentation was almond forest and the smallest was birch forest.The landscape diversity index was 0.79,the largest diversity index was 0.89,and they are similar.The evenness index was 0.89 close to 1,so the second-level landscape is balancing.
[1]肖笃宁,赵羿,宋中伟,等.沈阳西郊景观格局变化的研究[J].应用生态学报,1990,1(1):75-84.
[2]郭晋平.森林景观生态研究[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2001:28-45 .
[3]邬建国.观生态学——格局 过程 尺度与等级[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2000:100-200.
[4]李琳,牛玉璐,边文,等.木兰围场自然保护区蕨类植物多样性的初步研究[J].河北师范大学学报,2006,9(5):602-605.
[5]彭志杰,姚卫红,董金秀,等.基于GIS的县域森林景观格局研究——以河北省大名县为例[J].河北林果研究,2011,26(2):136-139.
[6]卢振启,魏京京,许中旗,等.混铁沟流域森林景观特征研究[J].河北林果研究,2013,28(3):296-232.
[7]刘凤芹,陈波,李少宁,等.北京八达岭石佛寺森林景观特征分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2015,29(4):149-153.
[8]郭晋平,阳含熙,薛俊杰.关帝山森林景观异质性及其动态的研究[J].应用生态学报,1999,10(2):167-170.
[9]王国华,李际平,赵春燕.基于层次分析法的森林景观边缘效应强度分析[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2012,32(4):110-116.
[10]陈彩虹,毛旭鹏,佘济云.宁远河流域森林景观格局分析[J].中国农学通报,2012,28(7):32-37.
[11]张振发,谢双喜,吴志文.松柏山水库流域森林景观健康评价[J].中国园艺文摘,2011(12):79-82.
[12]孙楠,王京民,赵鹏祥.基于GPS的黄龙山林区森林景观格局分析[J].西北农林科技大学学报,2013,41(9):61-67.