欢迎访问林草资源研究
科学研究

西洞庭湖区不同森林景观内灌草物种多样性及综合指数研究

  • 李际平 ,
  • 陈靖 ,
  • 袁晓红 ,
  • 陈磊 ,
  • 高宇
展开
  • 中南林业科技大学 林学院,长沙 410004
李际平(1957-),男,湖南醴陵人,教授,博导,主要从事林业系统工程方面的研究。Email:1015891821@qq.com

收稿日期: 2016-09-08

  修回日期: 2016-10-09

  网络出版日期: 2020-11-02

基金资助

国家自然科学基金资助项目(31470642)

Shrub and Herb Diversity in Different Forest Landscapes in West Dongting Lake

  • LI Jiping ,
  • CHEN Jing ,
  • YUAN Xiaohong ,
  • CHEN Lei ,
  • GAO Yu
Expand
  • College of Forestry,Central South University of Forestry &Technology,Changsha 410004,China

Received date: 2016-09-08

  Revised date: 2016-10-09

  Online published: 2020-11-02

摘要

对西洞庭湖区主要森林景观类型的林下灌木层和草本层进行物种多样性的调查分析。将综合评价法与熵权法相结合得到物种多样性综合指数,衡量不同森林景观林下物种多样性综合水平,根据各指标权重值,找出影响本研究区物种多样性水平的主要因子。结果表明,不同森林景观林下草本层Simpson指数在0.793 0~0.916 1之间,Shannon-Wiener指数在1.759 6~2.717 6之间,在杉木幼龄林景观中最高,在竹林中最低。灌木层Simpson指数在0.794 2~0.927 7之间,Shannon-Wiener指数在1.869 9~2.909 0之间,在阔叶林景观中最大,竹林中最小,整体上灌木层高于草本层。物种多样性综合指数在0.012 3~0.829 4之间,在阔叶林景观中最大,竹林中最小。林下灌草物种丰富度水平低和草本层物种均匀度水平低是影响研究区竹林、灌木林等景观林下物种多样性水平的主要因子。

本文引用格式

李际平 , 陈靖 , 袁晓红 , 陈磊 , 高宇 . 西洞庭湖区不同森林景观内灌草物种多样性及综合指数研究[J]. 林草资源研究, 2016 , 0(6) : 82 -87 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2016.06.016

Abstract

This paper presented the investigation and analysis on the species diversity of shrub layer and herb layer in the main forest landscape types in West Dongting Lake.Comprehensive evaluation method and entropy weight method are combined to get the comprehensive indexes of species diversity,and the comprehensive level of species diversity in different forest landscapes was measured.According to the weight value of each index,the main factors affecting the level of species diversity in the study area were found out.The results show that the Simpson indexes of herb layer were 0.793 0~0.916 1.The Shannon-Wiener indexes of herb layer were 1.759 6~2.717 6.The young Chinese fir forest landscape is the highest and the bamboo forest landscape is the lowest.The Simpson indexes of shrub layer were 0.794 2~0.927 7.The Shannon-Wiener indexes of shrub layer were 1.869 9~2.909 0.The broad leaved forest landscape is the highest and the bamboo forest landscape is the lowest。The species diversity index of shrub layer was higher than that of the herb layer as a whole.The comprehensive index of species diversity in different forest landscapes was 0.012 3~0.829 4。The broad leaved forest landscape is the highest and the bamboo forest landscape is the lowest.The low level of species richness and evenness of herb layer was the main factors influencing the level of species diversity of different forest landscapes in the study area,such as bamboo forest,shrub forest,and so on.

参考文献

[1] 汪殿蓓,暨淑仪,陈飞鹏.植物群落物种多样性研究综述[J].生态学杂志,2001,20(4):55-60.
[2] Fridley J D.The influence of species diversity on ecosystem productivity:how,where,and why?[J].Oikos,2001,93(3):514-526.
[3] 崔宁洁,陈小红,刘洋,等.不同林龄马尾松人工林林下灌木和草本多样性[J].生态学报,2014,34(15):4313-4323.
[4] 袁晓红.森林景观斑块耦合网络及动力学研究[D].长沙:中南林业科技大学,2012.
[5] 许晴,张放,许中旗,等.Simpson指数和Shannon-Wiener指数若干特征的分析及"稀释效应"[J].草业科学,2011,28(4):527-531.
[6] 马克平,刘玉明.生物群落多样性的测度方法Ⅰ α多样性的测度方法(下)[J].生物多样性,1994,2(4):231-239.
[7] 郭正刚,刘慧霞,孙学刚,等.白龙江上游地区森林植物群落物种多样性的研究[J].植物生态学报,2003,27(3):388-395.
[8] 胡永宏,贺思辉.综合评价方法[M].北京:科学出版社,2000:1-5.
[9] 贾艳红,赵军,南忠仁,等.基于熵权法的草原生态安全评价——以甘肃牧区为例[J].生态学杂志,2006,25(8):1003-1008.
[10] 吴彦,刘庆,何海,等.亚高山针叶林人工恢复过程中物种多样性变化[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(8):1301-1306.
[11] 汪超,王孝安,王玲.不同种植年代油松林植物多样性及土壤养分变化[J].生态学杂志,2007,26(8):1182-1186.
[12] 杨学军,姜志林.溧阳地区森林景观的生物多样性评价[J].生态学报,2001,21(4):671-675.
文章导航

/