欢迎访问林草资源研究
科学研究

考虑地形因素的像元均方差抛物线拟合高山松丰度研究

  • 蒋胜昌 ,
  • 张加龙 ,
  • 陆驰 ,
  • 胥辉 ,
  • 黄传烯 ,
  • 罗云江
展开
  • 1.西南林业大学 林学院,昆明 650224;
    2.西南林业大学 云南高校林业3S技术工程研究中心,昆明 650224
蒋胜昌(1993-),男,云南曲靖人,在读学士,主要从事林业遥感方面的研究工作。Email:1905262731@qq.com

收稿日期: 2016-07-20

  修回日期: 2016-09-08

  网络出版日期: 2020-11-02

基金资助

云南省教育厅科学研究基金重点项目(2015Z143);西南林业大学林学一级学科中青年后备人才培养计划(5009750101-1);国家林业局林业公益性行业科研专项(201404309)

Pixel Mean Variance Parabola Fitting of Pinus densata Abundance Based on Topographic Factors

  • JIANG Shengchang ,
  • ZHANG Jialong ,
  • LU Chi ,
  • XU Hui ,
  • HUANG Chuanxi ,
  • LUO Yunjiang
Expand
  • 1. Faculty of Forestry,Southwest Forestry University,Kunming 650224,Yunnan,China;
    2. 3S Technology and Engineering Research Center in Forestry of the Yunnan Universities,Southwest Forestry University,Kunming 650224,Yunnan,China

Received date: 2016-07-20

  Revised date: 2016-09-08

  Online published: 2020-11-02

摘要

基于香格里拉地区Landsat 8影像、外业调查和森林资源二类调查数据,采用坡度匹配法对遥感数据进行了地形校正,使用线性波谱分离(LSU)、匹配滤波(MF)、最小能量约束(CEM)、像元均方差抛物线(PMVP)等4种方法,提取了高山松丰度图。分析丰度结果,4个典型样区平均均方根误差值排序为LSU<PMVP<CEM<MF,PMVP能较好地分出高山松边界信息,丰度提取效果较好。使用上述4种不同方法将4个不同的地物混合类型提取的高山松丰度与真实丰度(0.557 7)进行对比,接近程度依次为PMVP,LSU,CEM,MF。利用像元均方差抛物线方法提取高山松丰度精度较高,后期还可以探索更合适的拟合曲线方法,使其能应用到森林树种的丰度提取和林地覆盖分类中。

本文引用格式

蒋胜昌 , 张加龙 , 陆驰 , 胥辉 , 黄传烯 , 罗云江 . 考虑地形因素的像元均方差抛物线拟合高山松丰度研究[J]. 林草资源研究, 2016 , 0(5) : 59 -64 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2016.05.011

Abstract

Four typical research sample areas which are boundary mixed were selected based on Landsat8 images.The method of slope matching was used to do topographic corrections.The abundance of the Pinus densat was extracted using the method of linear spectral separation(LSU),matched filtering(MF),the minimum energy constraint(CEM),the pixel mean variance parabola(PMVP).The results of the abundance show that the order of the average root mean square error values of the four typical sample areas is:LSU <PMVP<CEM <MF.The PMVP could better separate Pinus densat boundary with a good result.Using PMVP to extract abundance has achieved higher accuracy.It could also explore more suitable curve fitting methods applied to the extraction of forest tree species abundance and land cover classification in the future.

参考文献

[1] 张加龙,胥辉,岳彩荣,等.基于CA-Markov的香格里拉县森林景观格局变化及预测[J].东北林业大学学报,2013(6):46-49.
[2] 胥辉,岳彩荣.基于遥感技术的香格里拉县森林景观变化与森林生物量估测研究[M].昆明:云南科技出版社,2014.
[3] Woodcock C E,Allen R,Anderson M,et al.Free access to Landsat imagery[J].Science,2008,320:1011.
[4] Yang J,Weisberg P J,Bristow N A.Landsat remote sensing approaches for monitoring long-term tree cover dynamics in semi-arid woodlands:comparison of vegetation indices and spectral mixture analysis[J].Remote Sensing of Environment,2012,119(8):62-71.
[5] 吕长春,王忠武,钱少猛.混合像元分解模型综述[J].遥感信息,2003(3):55-58.
[6] Somers B,Cools K,DelalieuxS,et al.Nonlinear hyperspectral mixture analysis for tree cover estimates in orchards[J].Remote Sensing of Environment,2009,113(6):1183-1193.
[7] 李素,李文正,周建军,等.遥感影像混合像元分解中的端元选择方法综述[J].地理与地理信息科学,2007,23(5):35-38,42.
[8] 唐晓燕,高昆,倪国强.高光谱图像非线性解混方法的研究进展[J].遥感技术与应用,2013,28(4):731-738.
[9] 许菡.遥感影像混合像元分解新方法及应用研究[D].北京:首都师范大学,2013.
[10] Chander G,Markham B L,Helder D L.Summary of current radiometric calibration coefficients for Landsat MSS,TM,ETM+,and EO-1 ALI sensors[J].Remote Sensing of Environment,2009,113(5):893-903.
[11] Berk A,Bernstein L S,Anderson G P,et al.MODTRAN cloud and multiple scattering upgrades with application to AVIRIS[J].Remote Sensing of Environment,1998,65(3):367-375.
[12] Nichol J,Sing L K.Empirical correction of low Sun angle images in steeply sloping terrain:a slope-matching technique[J].International Journal of Remote Sensing,2006,27(3):629-635.
[13] 田珊珊,杨敏华.遥感影像混合像元分解算法对比分析[J].现代测绘,2016,39(1):11-13.
文章导航

/