选取广西杉木连栽一代林(G1)和二代林(G2)土壤的容重、孔隙度、持水量和贮水量等11个物理性质作为参评对象,利用MCE-Gray软件计算出广西杉木幼林不同栽植代数、不同土层深度土壤水分物理状况的关联度及大小排名。分析结果表明:1) G1,G2的土壤容重均随深度的增加而增加,随着栽植代数的增加,土壤容重趋于减少;2) 随土层深度的增加,G1,G2的总孔隙度、毛管孔隙度、饱和持水量和毛管持水量均逐渐增加;3) 杉木林在0～40 cm土层中,G2林地土壤物理性质优于G1林地,G2的土壤保水能力较G1强,但G2的涵养水源能力比G1弱;4)土壤容重对土壤水分物理状况的影响最为重要,连栽杉木人工幼林林地的水分物理状况水平排列顺序为G2(0～20cm)＞G2(20～40cm)＞G1(0～20cm)＞G1(20～40cm)。
In order to provid a reliable basis in theory for sustainable management and sustainable nutrient management of successive planting of Cunninghamia lanceolata plantations in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region,the eleven evaluation objects(such as soil bulk density,soil porosity,soil water retaining capacity and soil water storage etc.) were selected as the research objects,and modern comprehensive evaluation software of AHP module was used to calculate and analyze the correlation degree and size ranking of soil moisture physical condition of Cunninghamia lanceolata plantations under different plantings(G1 and G2)and different soil thickness(0～20cm and 20～40cm).The results showed that:(1) The soil bulk density of Cunninghamia lanceolata plantations under different rotations increased with the increment of soil depth.The soil bulk density of soil were greatly reduced by the continuous cropping of Cunninghamia lanceolata.(2) With the increment of soil depth,total porosity,capillary porosity,saturated moisture capacity,capillary holding capacity increased gradually.(3) In the layer of 0～40 cm,the soil total and uncapillary porosity of the second generation forest was larger than the first one,soil water retention capacity of the second generation forest was stronger than the first one,but the former was weaker.(4) The effect of soil bulk density on soil moisture physical condition was the most important,and the order of soil moisture physical condition in the field of successive planting Cunninghamia lanceolata was G2(0～20cm) ＞G2(20～40cm)＞G1(0～20cm)＞G1(20～40cm)。
[1] 李灵,张玉,孔丽娜,等.武夷山风景区不同林地类型土壤水分物理性质及土壤水库特性[J].水土保持通报,2011,31(3):60-65.
[2] Philip J R.Hillslo peinfiltrateion divergent and convergeslopes[J].Water Resource,1991,27(6):1035-1040.
[3] Boix-Fay os C,Calv o-Cases A,Imeson A C,et al.Influence of soil properties on the aggregation of some Mediterranean soils and the use of aggregate size and stability as land degradation indicators[J].Catena,2001,44(1):47-67.
[4] Yu Yuan Li,Ming An Shao.Change of soil physical properties under long-term natural vegetation restoration in the Loess Plateau of China[J].Journal of Arid Environments,2006,64(1):77-96.
[5] 巍强,张秋良,代海燕,等.大青山不同林地类型土壤特性及其水源涵养功能[J].水土保持学报,2008,22(2):111-115.
[6] 田月亮,张金池,李海东,等.不同林分类型土壤水分物理性质及其海拔效应——以浙江省凤阳山为例[J].水土保持通报,2013,33(1):53-57.
[7] 尹伟伦.全球森林与环境关系研究进展[J].森林与环境学报,2015,35(1):1-7.
[8] Peter A C.Developments in soil water physics since the mid 1960s[J].Geoderma,2001,100:355-387.
[9] 张顺恒,陈辉.桉树人工林的水源涵养功能[J].福建林学院学报,2010,30(4):300-303.
[10] 范志伟,杨章旗.不同密度马尾松人工林水源涵养能力的比较[J].广西林业科学,2012,41(1):19-22.
[11] 黄启堂,陈爱玲,贺军.不同毛竹林林地土壤理化性质特征比较[J].福建林学院学报,2006,26(4):299-302.
[12] 王燕,王兵,赵广东,等.江西大岗山3种林型土壤水分物理性质研究[J].水土保持学报,2008,22(1):151-153.
[13] 王斌,杨校生,李正才,等.不同气候区4种典型地带性植被土壤水文功能比较[J].林业资源管理,2009(6):84-90.
[14] 朱艺旋,孟京辉.不同发育阶段杉木人工林土壤物理性质对比分析[J].河北林果研究,2015,30(2):103-107.
[15] 俞元春,邓西海.杉木连栽对土壤物理性质的影响[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2000,24(6):36-40.
[16] 孙启武,杨承栋,焦如珍.江西大岗山连栽杉木人工林土壤性质的变化[J].林业科学,2003,39(3):1-5.
[17] 盛炜彤.土壤物理性质与杉木生长关系的研究·人工林地力衰退研究[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,1992:40-147.
[18] 杨洪学.阿什河流域森林植被水源涵养功能综合评价[D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2005.
[19] 盛炜彤,杨承栋,张家城,等.杉木人工林的土壤性质变化[J].林业科学研究,2003,16(4):377-385.
[20] 黄承标,温远光,莫炯松.尾巨桉不同连栽代数林地土壤水文-物理性质的研究[J].生态环境,2007,16(2):538-543.
[21] 马雪华.四川米亚罗地区高山冷衫林水文作用的研究[J].林业科学,1987,23(3):256-259.
[22] 徐凤兰,魏坦,刘爱琴.杉木泡桐混交幼林地土壤的物理性质[J].浙江林学院学报,2000,17(3):285-288.
[23] 郑郁善,陈礼光,洪伟.毛竹杉木混交林生产力和土壤性状研究[J].林业科学,1998,34(1):16-25.
