欢迎访问林草资源研究
科学研究

三亚市生态补偿区森林生态评价

  • 陈磊 ,
  • 李际平 ,
  • 唐宪 ,
  • 曹小玉 ,
  • 陈靖 ,
  • 高宇
展开
  • 1.中南林业科技大学 林学院,长沙 410004;
    2.三亚市林业科学研究院,海南 三亚 572000
陈磊(1991-),男,湖南永州人,在读硕士,主要从事森林经理方面的研究。Email:415016798@qq.com

收稿日期: 2017-01-15

  修回日期: 2016-06-02

  网络出版日期: 2020-11-02

基金资助

三亚市森林生态效益补偿机制项目(8355)

Forest Ecological Evaluation of Sanya City's Ecological Compensation Area

  • CHEN Lei ,
  • LI Jiping ,
  • TANG Xian ,
  • CAO Xiaoyu ,
  • CHEN Jing ,
  • GAO Yu
Expand
  • 1. School of Forestry,Central South University of Forestry & Technology,Changsha 410004,China;
    2. Sanya Forestry Science Research Institute,Sanya,Hainan 572000,China

Received date: 2017-01-15

  Revised date: 2016-06-02

  Online published: 2020-11-02

摘要

以三亚市生态补偿区生态公益林为研究对象,从森林的结构、稳定性和功能性3个方面构建了森林生态评价指标体系,在此基础上,以小班为评价单元,对研究区的森林生态水平进行了评价。结果表明:森林生态评价的6个指标层因子权重由大到小分别为:森林蓄积量(0.25)、森林自然度(0.20)、森林群落结构(0.20)、森林健康等级(0.15)、郁闭度(0.10)、平均树高(0.10)。4个区域整体生态水平处于中等水平,而抱安区的生态水平是最高的,4个区域的森林生态水平大小为抱安区>那会区>青法区>扎南区。

本文引用格式

陈磊 , 李际平 , 唐宪 , 曹小玉 , 陈靖 , 高宇 . 三亚市生态补偿区森林生态评价[J]. 林草资源研究, 2016 , 0(3) : 92 -97 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2016.03.017

Abstract

With the ecological public welfare forest in Sanya city as the research object and on the basis of the structure,stability and functions of the forest,an index system of forest ecological evaluation was constructed.Based on this,the forest ecological level of the study area was evaluated with the small class as the evaluation unit.The results showed that the six indicators of forest ecological evaluation factor weights from big to small were:forest volume(0.25),forest naturalness(0.20),forest community structure(0.20),forest health level(0.15),canopy density(0.10) and the average tree height (0.10). Four overall regional ecological levels were at the medium level,and the ecological level is the highest in Baoan area.The level of forest ecology in the four regions was Baoan area >Nahui area >Qingfa area >Zhanan area.

参考文献

[1] 李明阳.森林生态评价的尺度和指标[J].中南林业调查规划,1997(3):52-54.
[2] 赵刚源.森林生态指数在森林资源质量评价中的应用[J].林业勘察设计,2007(2):23-26.
[3] 王柏昌,张伟东,杨智萍.森林生态指数在森林资源规划设计调查中的应用[J].华东森林经理,2007(1):52-53.
[4] 曾伟生,肖前辉.森林生态状况综合指数评价方法探讨[J].中南林业调查规划,2008(4):5-8.
[5] 张现武,郑春茂,唐学君,等.上海市森林生态功能综合指数评定[J].亚热带水土保持,2015(3):34-37.
[6] 谢肖昀,李际平,曹小玉,等.福寿国有林场杉木生态公益林多功能评价[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2015(4):14-18.
[7] 李永宁,张宾兰,秦淑英,等.郁闭度及其测定方法研究与应用[J].世界林业研究,2008,21(1): 40-46.
[8] 朱教君,康宏樟,胡理乐.应用全天空照片估计林分透光孔隙度(郁闭度)[J].生态学杂志,2005,24(10):1234-1240.
[9] 文昌宇,黄俊泽.浅议广东森林自然度划分标准[J].中南林业调查规划,2006(3):8-10.
[10] Mcroberts R E,Winter S,Chirici G,et al.Assessing Forest Naturalness[J].Forest Science,2012,58(3):294-309.
[11] Bartha D,Ódor P,Horváth T,et al.Relationship of tree stand heterogeneity and forest naturalness[J].Acta Silvatica Et Lignaria Hungarica,2006(2):7-22.
[12] 赵中华.基于林分状态特征的森林自然度评价研究[D].北京:中国林业科学研院,2009:10-16.
[3] 李俊清,牛树奎,刘艳红.森林生态学第二版[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2010:211-219.
[14] Alexander S A,Palmer C J.Forest health monitoring in the United States First four years[J].Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,1999,55(2):267-277.
[15] Craig,G A.Fores thealth on non-industrial private lands:Meeting Owner′s needs and wants[J].J.For.,1994(6):27-30.
文章导航

/