欢迎访问林草资源研究
科学研究

河南省重要湿地生态状况评价

  • 王春平
展开
  • 河南省林业调查规划院,郑州 450045
王春平(1964-),男,河南武陟人,高工,研究方向为湿地与野生动植物资源监测。Email:hnly1688@163.com

收稿日期: 2016-05-09

  修回日期: 2016-05-26

  网络出版日期: 2020-11-02

Evaluation on Ecological Conditions of Important Wetlands in Henan Province

  • WANG Chunping
Expand
  • Henan Province Forest Inventory and Planning Institute,Zhengzhou 450045,China

Received date: 2016-05-09

  Revised date: 2016-05-26

  Online published: 2020-11-02

摘要

以河南省第二次湿地资源调查为基础,综合利用反映湿地生态状况的自然湿地面积、生物多样性、水环境,及湿地利用和受威胁状况等方面的调查数据,建立湿地生态状况综合评价指标体系,采用层次分析方法(AHP)和德尔菲法,对河南省39个重要湿地的生态状况进行评价。结果表明:生态状况较好的湿地仅占评价湿地面积的2.00%,生态状况中等的湿地占72.63%,生态状况较差的湿地占25.37%。许多重要湿地仍然面临诸多威胁,亟待采取抢救性保护恢复措施。

本文引用格式

王春平 . 河南省重要湿地生态状况评价[J]. 林草资源研究, 2016 , 0(3) : 86 -91 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2016.03.016

Abstract

Based on the result of the 2nd Henan wetland resources investigation involving natural wetland area,biodiversity,water environment,wetland utilization,threat categories which directly reflect wetlands' ecological conditions,the research built a comprehensive evaluation index system to evaluate the ecological conditions of 39 major wetlands in Henan province adopting the AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Program) and Delphi Method.The evaluation results show that wetlands with good ecological conditions only account for 2% of total evaluated wetland area,wetlands with medium conditions 72.63% and those with poor conditions 25.37%.Many major wetlands are still faced with various threats and require rescuing protection and conservation.

参考文献

[1] 张峥,张建文,李寅年,等.湿地生态评价指标体系[J].农业环境保护,1999,18(6):283-285.
[2] 王春平.河南省湿地面积动态变化与保护对策[J].河南林业科技,2014,34(1):31-32.
[3] Tiner R W.Wetlands of United States:Current status and recent trend[M].Washington D.C.:U.S.Government Printing office,1984.
[4] 史作民,程瑞梅,陈力,等.区域生态系统多样性评价方法[J].农村生态环境学报,1996,12(2):1-5.
[5] 宋劲忻,温庆忠,华朝朗,等.云南省湿地生态状况评价[J].湿地科学,2015,13(1):24-28.
[7] 李润田.河南水资源[M].郑州:河南教育出版社,1994.
[8] 刘文敬,白洁,马静,等.中国自然保护区管理能力现状调查与分析[J].北京林业大学学报,2011,33(S2):49-53.
文章导航

/