欢迎访问林草资源研究
研究简报

广东8种主要乔木树种碳含量测定分析

  • 张红爱
展开
  • 广东省林业调查规划院,广州 510520
张红爱(1977-),女,高工,硕士,主要从事森林生态监测以及林业碳汇计量监测研究。154963211@qq.com

收稿日期: 2017-06-01

  修回日期: 2017-12-02

  网络出版日期: 2020-09-27

基金资助

广东省林业科技创新平台建设项目(2016CXPT03);广东省低碳发展专项资金支持项目([2012]14);广东省林业科技创新专项基金科研项目(2012KFCX019-01)

Measurement and Analysis of Carbon Content Rates of Eight Tree Species in Guangdong Province

  • Hongai ZHANG
Expand
  • Forestry Surveying and Designing Institute of Guangdong Province,Guangzhou 510520,China

Received date: 2017-06-01

  Revised date: 2017-12-02

  Online published: 2020-09-27

摘要

应用湿烧法对广东地区8种主要乔木树种(马尾松、速生相思、杉木、桉树、湿地松、硬阔类、软阔类、黎蒴)的碳含量进行了测定,并对不同树种、不同器官、不同径阶、不同树干高度的碳含量进行分析。结果表明:1)不同树种碳含量高低依次为湿地松>杉木>马尾松>速生相思>硬阔类>桉树>软阔类>黎蒴;针叶树的碳含量大于阔叶树;2)不同器官碳含量大小关系为树叶>树枝>树皮>树干>树根,器官碳含量遵循由上到下,呈现由外到里逐渐减少的趋势;3)不同树种不同树干高度位置碳含量十分接近,变异系数均在3.64%以内;4)研究区域树木碳含量受径阶影响很小,碳含量变化幅度小,同一树种不同径阶下不同器官的碳含量变化情况呈现多样性,同一树种内不同径阶和不同高度位置碳含量呈先上升后下降的趋势。径阶与树干高度位置碳含量没有相关性,但总体上相同高度位置下样品碳含量随着径阶的增加先上升后下降。以上结果说明,不同树种之间,相同树种内部不同器官之间,以及不同特性相同树种之间碳含量存在差异性。对各地区、各树种、各森林生态系统的碳含量进行全方位精确测定,可为提高估算其碳储量的准确度提供科学依据。

关键词: 乔木; 碳含量; 器官; 高度; 径阶

本文引用格式

张红爱 . 广东8种主要乔木树种碳含量测定分析[J]. 林草资源研究, 2018 , 0(1) : 148 -154 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2018.01.021

Abstract

Carbon content values of eight tree species in the region,i.e.,Pinus massoniana,fast growing acacia,chinese fir,eucalyptus,slashpine,hardwood,softwood,and Castanopsis fissa,were measured based on the wet burning approach.In addition,carbon content of these trees with respect to several potential influencing factors,i.e.,tree species,tree organs,diameter grades,and vertical trunk positions,were analyzed.Experimental results showed that:1)with respect to tree species,the carbon contents in descending order are:slash pine > chinese fir > Pinus massoniana > fast growing acacia > hardwood > eucalyptus > softwood > Castanopsis fissa .2)With respect to tree organs,the descending carbon contents are:leaves>branches>bark>trunks>roots,and the carbon content decreased when the positions of these organs located from top to bottom or from outside to inside.3)With respect to vertical trunk positions,the carbon contents of all eight species are very close,and coefficients of variation for those species are all less than 3.64%. 4)With respect to diameter grades,variation amplitudes of carbon contents of sampled trees in Guangdong are relatively small.However,for the same tree species,the carbon contents of different organs from the same tree species varied with their diameter grades,and the carbon content increased firstly and then decreased along with the increasing of diameter grades or vertical trunk positions.No correlations were observed between the rates of diameter grades and that of vertical trunk positions.For samples under the same vertical trunk positions,the carbon content rised in the beginning and then descended with the rises of diameter grades.In general,significant differences in carbon content were perceived among different tree species,or different tree organs of the same species,or distinct influencing factors of the same species.The accurate determination of carbon contents in various areas,tree species and forest ecosystems can provide a scientific basis for improving the accuracy of estimating their carbon reserves.

参考文献

[1] 马钦彦, 陈遐林, 王娟, 等. 华北主要森林类型建群种的含碳率分析[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2002,24(5):96-100.
[2] 刘雨桐, 贡璐, 刘曾媛. 塔里木盆地南缘典型绿洲不同土壤类型土壤有机碳含量及矿化特征[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2017,31(2):162-166.
[3] 叶金盛, 佘光辉. 广东省森林植被碳储量动态研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版, 2010,34(4):7-12.
[4] 李明军, 杜明凤, 喻理飞. 贵州省森林植被碳储量、碳密度及其分布[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2016,31(1):48-54.
[5] Dong J R, Kaufmann R K, Myneni R B, et al. Remote sensing estimates of boreal and temperate forest woody biomass:carbon pools,sources,and sinks[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2003,84(3):393-410.
[6] Fang J Y, Chen A P, Peng C H, et al. Changes in forest biomass carbon storage in China between 1949 and 1998[J]. Science, 2001,292(5525):2320.
[7] 陶玉华, 冯金朝, 马麟英, 等. 广西罗城马尾松、杉木、桉树人工林碳储量及其动态变化[J]. 生态环境学报, 2011,20(11):1608-1613.
[8] 程堂仁, 冯菁, 马钦彦, 等. 甘肃小陇山森林植被碳库及其分配特征[J]. 生态学报, 2008,28(1):33-44.
[9] 侯琳, 雷瑞德. 秦岭火地塘林区油松林下主要灌木碳吸存[J]. 生态学报, 2009,29(11):6077-6084.
[10] 于颖, 范文义, 李明泽. 东北林区不同尺度森林的含碳率[J]. 应用生态学报, 2012,23(2):341-346.
[11] Djomo A N, Knohl A, and Gravenhorst G. Estimations of total ecosystem carbon pools distribution and carbon biomass current annual increment of a moist tropical forest[J]. Forest Ecology & Management, 2011,261(8):1448-1459.
[12] 牛攀新, 宋于洋, 周朝彬. 准噶尔盆地梭梭群落生物量和碳储量[J]. 生态学报, 2014,34(14):3962-3968.
[13] 王金亮, 王小花, 岳彩荣, 等. 滇西北香格里拉森林4个建群种的含碳率[J]. 生态环境学报, 2012,21(4):613-619.
[14] 尉海东, 马祥庆, 中亚热带不同发育阶段杉木人工林生态系统碳贮量研究[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2006,28(2):239-243.
[15] 徐小静, 朱向辉, 汪方德, 等. 毛竹等11种浙江省碳汇造林树种含碳率分析[J]. 竹子研究汇刊, 2009,28(1):21-24.
[16] 郑朝晖, 马春霞, 马江林, 等. 6种乔木树种固碳能力和能量转化效率分析[J]. 西南林业大学学报, 2011,31(4):7-11.
[17] 罗艳, 唐才富, 辛文荣, 等. 青海省云杉属(Picea)和圆柏属(Sabina)乔木含碳率分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2014(11):1764-1768.
[18] 刘维, 张晓丽, 马菁. 鹫峰国家森林公园主要乔木树种含碳率分析[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2011,26(5):214-218.
[19] 唐宵, 黄从德, 张健, 等. 四川主要针叶树种的含碳率分析[J]. 四川林业科技, 2007,2B(2):20-23.
[20] 张萍. 北京森林碳储量研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2009.
文章导航

/