草海流域6种林分枯落物水源涵养功能研究
收稿日期: 2019-11-27
修回日期: 2019-12-17
网络出版日期: 2020-05-18
基金资助
贵州省重大专项项目“草海综合整治工程植被涵养水源功能技术集成研发”(黔科合重大专项字(2016)3022-06);贵州省重大专项项目“喀斯特石漠化地区生态经济功能配置模式及关键技术”(黔科合JZ字(2014)200211);贵州省科技计划项目“喀斯特森林冠层结构与优化配置研究”(黔科合SY字(2013)3165)
Study on Water Retention Function of Litters in Six Forest Stands in Caohai Watershed
Received date: 2019-11-27
Revised date: 2019-12-17
Online published: 2020-05-18
为草海流域水文生态功能调控与植被恢复的物种组合配置提供依据,以贵州威宁草海流域6种林分(云南松林、云南松-滇杨针阔混交林、滇杨林、茶树林、华山松林、杉木林)枯落物作为研究对象,结合实地测量与室内浸泡法,分析比较其枯落物层厚度、蓄积量及涵养水源过程的差异,并通过坐标分析法综合评价其涵养水源的能力。结果表明:6种林分枯落物层总厚度变化范围在1.34~3.26cm之间,蓄积量变化范围在0.62 ~3.53 t/hm 2之间,最大持水量在0.76~5.57 t/hm 2之间,最大持水率在119.05~207.69%之间,其中,未分解层的厚度、蓄积量与最大持水量显著高于半分解层;持水量、持水速率与浸水时间分别符合方程:Q=alnt+b,R 2 >0.82;v=kt n, R 2 >0.98。综合分析结果表明,6种林分枯落物层水源涵养功能从大到小依次表现为:云南松林(0.30)>滇杨林(0.42)>针阔混交林(1.19)>杉木林(1.35)>华山松林(1.51)>茶树林(2.64)。云南松林的蓄积量最大,滇杨林的持水量最大,持水率最大的为针阔混交林。从涵养水源功能的角度,云南松和滇杨可作为草海流域植被恢复的首选树种。
侯春兰 , 杨瑞 , 王勇 , 刘志 , 瞿爽 , 文慧 , 马思怡 , 陈颜明 . 草海流域6种林分枯落物水源涵养功能研究[J]. 林草资源研究, 2020 , 0(1) : 108 -115 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2020.01.014
To provide a basis for the regulation of hydrological ecological function and the species allocation of vegetation in Caohai Watershed,6 forest stands in Weining Caohai watershed(Pinusyunnanensis forest, Pinusyunnanensis- Populusyunnanensis forest, Populusyunnanensis forest,Camellia sinensis forest, Pinusarmandi forest and Cunninghamialanceolata forest)were chosen as research subjects,combined with field measurement and indoor immersion method,the differences in the thickness of litters,accumulations and water conservation processes were analyzed and compared,and the functions of water conservation were comprehensively ranked by coordinate analysis method.The results showed that:the total thickness of the litter layer of the six forest stands varied from 1.34to 3.26cm,the amount of accumulation was between 0.62 and 3.53 t/hm 2,and the maximum water-holding capacity was between0.76 and 5.57 t/hm 2,the maximum water-holding ratewas between 119.05 and 207.69%.The thickness accumulation and the maximum water holding capacity of the undecomposed layer were significantly higher than the semi-decomposed layer;the water-holding capacity of the undecomposed layer and the semi-decomposed layer of litter had a significant logarithmic relationship with the water immersion time:Q=alnt+b, R 2 >0.82;the water absorption rate of the litter had a power function relationship with the water immersion time:v=kt n, R 2 >0.98.The results of comprehensive analysis showed that the water conservation functions of the litter layers in the six forest stands from large to small: Pinusyunnanensis forest > Populusyunnanensis forest >Coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest > Cunninghamialanceolata forest > Pinusarmandi forest > Camellia sinensis forest.The amount of accumulation of Pinusyunnanensis forest was the largest,the water holding capacity of Populusyunnanensis forest was the largest,and the water holding rate was the largest of Coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest.From the perspective of water conservation function,it is recommended that the preferred tree species for vegetation restoration are Pinusyunnanensis and Populusyunnanensis in Caohai watershed.
| [1] | 唐国华, 董希斌, 毛波 , 等. 大兴安岭山杨低质林改造对枯落物持水性能的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2016,44(10):35-40. |
| [2] | 王勤, 张宗应, 徐小牛 . 安徽大别山库区不同林分类型的土壤特性及其水源涵养功能[J]. 水土保持学报, 2003(3):59-62. |
| [3] | 张建利, 吴华, 喻理飞 , 等. 草海湿地流域优势树种凋落物叶分解与水文特征研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2014,28(3):98-103. |
| [4] | 涂志华, 范志平, 孙学凯 , 等. 大伙房水库流域不同植被类型枯落物层和土壤层水文效应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019,33(1):127-133. |
| [5] | 周志立, 张丽玮, 陈倩 , 等. 木兰围场3种典型林分枯落物及土壤持水能力[J]. 水土保持学报, 2015,29(1):207-213. |
| [6] | 侯贵荣, 毕华兴, 魏曦 , 等. 黄土残塬沟壑区3种林地枯落物和土壤水源涵养功能[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018,32(2):357-363. |
| [7] | 张枢 . 贵州草海生态环境现状及综合保护与修复方案[J]. 环境与发展, 2019,31(6):197-198. |
| [8] | 杨延峰, 张国钢, 陆军 , 等. 贵州草海越冬斑头雁日间行为模式及环境因素对行为的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2012,32(23):7280-7288. |
| [9] | 潘少兵, 任晓冬 . 草海国家级自然保护区水生植物群落的数量分类与排序分析[J]. 生物学杂志, 2010,27(5):60-63. |
| [10] | 张建利, 吴华, 喻理飞 , 等. 基于群落数量特征的喀斯特湿地林分优势种分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2013,22(1):58-65. |
| [11] | 陈毅凤, 张军, 万国江 . 贵州草海湖泊系统碳循环简单模式[J]. 湖泊科学, 2001(1):15-20 |
| [12] | 张建利, 吴华, 喻理飞 , 等. 草海湿地流域优势树种凋落物叶分解与水文特征研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2014,28(3):98-103. |
| [13] | 侯贵荣, 毕华兴, 魏曦 , 等. 黄土残塬沟壑区刺槐林枯落物水源涵养功能综合评价[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019,33(2):251-257. |
| [14] | 王利, 于立忠, 张金鑫 , 等. 浑河上游水源地不同林型水源涵养功能分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 2015,29(3):249-255. |
| [15] | 吴庆贵, 邹利娟, 吴福忠 , 等. 涪江流域丘陵区不同植被类型水源涵养功能[J]. 水土保持学报, 2012,26(6):254-258. |
| [16] | 张建利, 王加国, 李苇洁 , 等. 贵州百里杜鹃自然保护区杜鹃林枯落物储量及持水功能[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018,32(3):167-173. |
| [17] | 马国飞 , 满苏尔·沙比提,张雪琪.托木尔峰自然保护区台兰河上游不同植被类型的水源涵养功能[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018,32(1):210-216. |
| [18] | 周巧稚, 毕华兴, 孔凌霄 , 等. 晋西黄土区不同密度刺槐林枯落物层水文生态功能研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018,32(4):115-121. |
| [19] | 郭宇嘉, 牛庆花, 陆贵巧 , 等. 承德市第三乡林场不同林分类型枯落物和土壤的持水特性[J]. 水土保持研究, 2018,38(3):38-44. |
| [20] | 杨霞, 陈丽华, 康影丽 , 等. 辽东低山区5种典型水源涵养林枯落物持水特性[J]. 生态学杂志, 2019,38(9):2662-2670. |
| [21] | 张建利, 严令斌, 喻理飞 , 等. 草海流域3种优势树种凋落物叶分解历程中的水文特征[J]. 水土保持研究, 2014,21(6):61-66. |
| [22] | 王佑民 . 中国林地枯落物持水保土作用研究概况[J]. 水土保持学报, 2000(4):108-113. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
