欢迎访问林草资源研究
科学研究

科罗拉多蓝杉叶绿素荧光参数对土壤干旱胁迫的响应

  • 宋丹 ,
  • 宁明世
展开
  • 1.内蒙古建筑职业技术学院 建筑与规划学院,呼和浩特 010007
    2.内蒙古林木良种繁育中心,呼和浩特 010051
宋丹(1981-),女(蒙古族),内蒙古乌兰浩特人,副教授,硕士,主要研究方向为园林植物遗传育种。Email:Dansong4557@126.com

收稿日期: 2019-03-11

  修回日期: 2019-04-08

  网络出版日期: 2020-09-25

基金资助

国家林业局948项目(2015-4-19)

Responses of Photosynthesis and Fluorescence of Picea pungens Englenan on Soil Drought Stress

  • Dan SONG ,
  • Mingshi NING
Expand
  • 1. Architecture and Planning Institute, Inner Mongolia Technical College of Construction,Inner Mongolia, Hohhot,010070,China
    2. Inner Mongolia Tree Breeding Center,Inner Mongolia,Hohhot,010051,China

Received date: 2019-03-11

  Revised date: 2019-04-08

  Online published: 2020-09-25

摘要

以3a生的科罗拉多蓝杉盆栽苗为实验材料,采用人工给水和自然耗水结合法模拟自然条件下土壤干旱过程,土壤相对含水量(RWC)控制在13.3%~83.3%之间,分析科罗拉多蓝杉叶片光合作用和荧光参数对土壤干旱胁迫的响应过程及其机制。结果表明:随着RWC的降低,科罗拉多蓝杉叶片气体交换参数均呈现先升高后降低的变化趋势,其中,叶片净光合速率(Pn)、蒸腾速率(Tr)、水分利用效率(WUE)、气孔导度(Gs)均在RWC5(56.3%)时达到最大值。超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)、过氧化物酶(POD)、过氧化氢酶(CAT)随着RWC的降低,呈先增加后降低趋势,在RWC5时达到最大值,而丙二醛(MDA)呈相反的变化趋势。回归分析表明,Pn和WUE均与RWC呈一元二次方程(P<0.01),科罗拉多蓝杉叶片叶绿素荧光参数随着RWC呈先增加后降低趋势,在RWC5时达到最大值,当RWC超过56.3%时,叶绿素荧光参数急剧下降。总的来说,科罗拉多蓝杉叶绿素荧光参数对土壤干旱胁迫具有明显的阈值响应,响应的阈值点大约为56.3%。

本文引用格式

宋丹 , 宁明世 . 科罗拉多蓝杉叶绿素荧光参数对土壤干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 林草资源研究, 2019 , 0(3) : 124 -131 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2019.03.021

Abstract

This paper explores the responses of photosynthesis and fluorescence of Picea pungens Englenan on soil drought stress in Inner Mongolia region and clarifies the quantitative relationship between them and soil moisture.In this study,3-year old Colorado blue cedar potted seedlings were used as experimental materials,and the relative water content of soil(RWC) was controlled at 13.3%-83.3%.The combination of artificial water supply and natural water consumption was adopted to simulate the soil drought process under natural conditions,and the response process and mechanism of photosynthesis and fluorescence parameters of the leaves were analyzed.The results showed that the surface temperature gradually increased with the increase of the relative water content of the soil under increasing drought stress,and the surface temperature showed a sharp increase trend after RWC5.Surface humidity shows an opposite trend.As the soil relative water content(RWC) gradually reduce,the leaf gas exchange parameters are the changes of the lower of the first increase trend,among them,the leaf net photosynthetic rate(Pn),transpiration rate(Tr),water use efficiency(WUE),stomatal conductance(Gs) are maximum when relative soil water content for RWC5,illustrates the leaf gas exchange parameters there is a close relationship with the soil relative water content.Superoxide dismutase(SOD),peroxidase(POD) and catalase(CAT) first increased and then decreased with the relative water content(RWC) of the soil,which reached the maximum at RWC5,and then decreased sharply when the relative water content of the soil exceeded RWC5.Malondialdehyde(MDA) decreased with RWC.Regression analysis showed that Pn and WUE of leaves and RWC of Colorado blue cedar presented unitary quadratic equation(P<0.01).In addition,the chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of the leaves of the Colorado blue cedar show a trend of increasing and then decreasing with the relative water content of the soil(RWC),reaching the maximum at RWC5.When the relative water content of the soil exceeds RWC5,the chlorophyll fluorescence parameters drop sharply.Which shows that the Colorado this leaf gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters on soil moisture have obvious response threshold,the threshold point of soil relative water content is about RWC5,below the threshold of leaf photosynthetic rate from stomatal limitation to the stomatal limitation,damage to the photosynthetic parameters,the electron transfer,photosynthetic mechanism is damaged.

参考文献

[1] 杨锐, 郎莹, 张光灿, 等. 野生酸枣光合及叶绿素荧光参数对土壤干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 西北植物学报, 2018,38(5):922-931.
[2] 张伟杨, 徐云姬, 钱希旸, 等. 小麦籽粒游离多胺对土壤干旱的响应及其与籽粒灌浆的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2016,42(6):860-872.
[3] 许楠. 乡土风箱果和紫叶风箱果叶片光合特性对土壤干旱的响应[J]. 应用生态学报, 2017,28(6):1955-1961.
[4] 陆燕元, 马焕成, 李昊民, 等. 土壤干旱对转基因甘薯光合曲线响应的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2015,35(7):1-8.
[5] 张伟杨, 钱希旸, 李银银, 等. 土壤干旱对小麦生理性状和产量的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2016,36(4):491-500.
[6] 何建村, 白云岗, 张严俊. 基于 MODIS 数据新疆土壤干旱特征分析[J]. 干旱区地理, 2015,38(4):735-742.
[7] 杜国栋, 刘志琨, 赵玲, 等. 生物炭减缓干旱胁迫对秋子梨根系呼吸生理功能的影响[J]. 果树学报, 2016,33(S1):90-97.
[8] 崔婷茹, 于慧敏, 李会彬, 等. 干旱胁迫及复水对狼尾草幼苗生理特性的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2017,34(4):788-793.
[9] 邵德意, 罗海华, 陈功, 等. 花铃期土壤干旱对棉花叶片抗氧化及光合作用的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2018,30(2):155-163.
[10] 于文颖, 纪瑞鹏, 冯锐, 等. 干旱胁迫对玉米叶片光响应及叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2016,30(10):82-87.
[11] 李敏, 李丽, 杨宏, 等. 科罗拉多蓝杉的嫩枝扦插育苗技术研究[J]. 宁夏农林科技, 2015,56(4):10-11.
[12] 王京伟, 白靖怡, 刘冬云. 盐胁迫及 60Co-γ 射线辐射对科罗拉多蓝杉种子萌发的影响[J]. 河北林果研究, 2017,32(3/4):277.
[13] 翟金凤, 张军, 王强, 等. 科罗拉多蓝杉繁殖技术[J]. 吉林林业科技, 2017,46(4):45-46.
[14] 王少杰, 付宇辰, 冷平生, 等. 7 种彩叶树种光合特性分析[J]. 河北林果研究, 2017,32(3/4):269.
[15] 杨锐, 郎莹, 张光灿, 等. 野生酸枣光合及叶绿素荧光参数对土壤干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 西北植物学报, 2018,38(5):922-931.
[16] 刘家勇, 陈学宽, 夏红明, 等. 干旱胁迫下气温对甘蔗叶绿素荧光动力学参数的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2018,31(3):478-482.
[17] 李泽, 谭晓风, 卢锟, 等. 干旱胁迫对两种油桐幼苗生长气体交换及叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2017,37(5):1515-1524.
[18] 于文颖, 纪瑞鹏, 冯锐, 等. 干旱胁迫对玉米叶片光响应及叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2016,30(10):82-87.
[19] 胡化广, 张振铭, 季芳芳, 等. 干旱胁迫对结缕草叶绿素荧光和光合关键酶活性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2016,24(6):1304-1308.
[20] 王玉丽, 孙居文, 荀守华, 等. 干旱胁迫对东岳红光合特性叶绿素荧光参数及叶片相对含水量的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2017,49(4):46-50.
[21] 王飞, 刘世增, 康才周, 等. 干旱胁迫对沙地云杉光合叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2017,31(1):142-147.
[22] 李梦竹, 刘国顺, 贾方方. 干旱胁迫下旺长期烤烟冠层叶绿素密度的高光谱估测[J]. 中国烟草科学, 2017,38(1):23-28.
[23] 姚春娟, 郭圣茂, 马英超, 等. 干旱胁迫对4种决明属植物光合作用和叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2017,34(9):1880-1888.
[24] 王颖, 孔德浩, 陈佰鸿, 等 .外源 ALA 对干旱胁迫下山定子叶片叶绿素荧光特性及抗性生理指标的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2018,38(5):902-911.
文章导航

/