内黄林场优势树种龄级结构优化调整及评价
收稿日期: 2019-11-29
修回日期: 2019-12-27
网络出版日期: 2020-05-18
基金资助
河南省重点研发与推广专项(科技攻关192102110060);国家重点研发计划(2018YFD0600204-4)
The Optimization and Evaluation of Age-class Structure of Dominant Tree Species in Neihuang Forest Farm
Received date: 2019-11-29
Revised date: 2019-12-27
Online published: 2020-05-18
龄级结构是反映林分结构是否合理的主要方面,而建立森林收获调整模型是对龄级结构优化调整的重要途径。以河南省内黄林场优势树种杨树和刺槐为研究对象,基于林场2018年森林资源二类调查数据,利用线性规划和目标规划方法对林场优势树种龄级结构进行优化调整,并采用欧氏距离和平衡率对调整结构进行评价。结果表明:在调整期末各龄级面积分布均衡,2个树种龄级结构的平衡率均达到0.96,欧式距离缩小至85%以上,其中刺槐缩小达100%,接近法正状态;优势树种杨树和刺槐调整期内出材量分别达68 059.3m3和15 358.4m3,期末蓄积量分别占初期的127.6%和46.5%;优势树种杨树和刺槐碳储量期末分别达到26 797.4t和4 415.4t,分别占初期的111.3%和85%。
王露露 , 刘雪强 , 王丽霞 , 马顺兴 , 马瑞婷 , 闫东锋 . 内黄林场优势树种龄级结构优化调整及评价[J]. 林草资源研究, 2020 , 0(1) : 47 -53 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2020.01.007
Age-class structure is the main aspect reflecting whether the stand structure is reasonable,and establishing a forest harvest adjustment model is an important way to optimize and adjust the age-class structure.In this study,dominant tree species of Populus and Robiniapseudoacacia were surveyed in Neihuang Forest Farm of Henan province,based on the forest inventory data in the forest farm in 2018,the linear and target planning methods were used to optimize the age structure of the dominant tree species in the forest farm,and euclidean distance and balance rate were used to evaluate the adjustment structure.The results showed that the area distribution of each age-class was balanced at the end of the adjustment period,and the balance rate of the age structure of the two tree species reached 0.96,and the euclidean distance was reduced to more than 85%,and among them, Robiniapseudoacacia was reduced by 100% among the two tree species,which was close to the normal state.The yields of dominant tree species Populus and Robiniapseudoacacia reached 68059.3m3 and 15358.4m3 during the adjustment period,respectively,and the end-of-season stocks accounted for 127.6% and 46.5% of the beginning of the period.The carbon stocks of dominant tree species Populus and Robiniapseudoacacia reached 26797.4 t and 4415.4t at the end of the period,respectively,accounting for 111.3% and 85% of the initial stage.
| [1] | LAL R.Carbon sequestration[J].Philosophical Transactions Biological Sciences,2008,363(1492):815-830. |
| [2] | 陆元昌,张守攻,雷相东,等.人工林近自然化改造的理论基础和实施技术[J].世界林业研究,2009,22(1):20-27. |
| [3] | McDill M E,Braze J.Comparing adjacency constraint formulations for randomly generated forest planning problems with four age-class distributions[J].Forest Science,2000,46(3):423-436. |
| [4] | Snyder S,ReVelle C.Dynamic selection of harvests with adjacency restrictions:The SHARe Model[J].Forestry Sciences,1997,43(2):213-222. |
| [5] | Murray A T,Snyder S.Spatial modeling in forest managementand natural resource planning[J].Forest Science,2000,46(2):153-156. |
| [6] | 周国模,吴燕,吴志坤,等.目标规划在国营林场目标管理中的应用[J].浙江林学院学报,1991(1):55-61. |
| [7] | 邵卫才,邓华锋,胡丽秋,等.基于空间约束的村级森林收获调整研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版,2013,41(1):149-154. |
| [8] | 唐丽. 基于生长量的杉木林分龄级结构预测[J].西南农业大学学报:自然科学版,2006(2):264-266. |
| [9] | 邓成,梁志斌.森林生长收获模型发展中存在的问题及相关建议[J].世界林业研究,2015,28(1):92-96. |
| [10] | 陈增丰. 目标规划和线性规划两步优化法在森林收获调整中的应用[J]. 福建林学院学报,1994(4):328-338. |
| [11] | Baskent E Z,Keles S.Developing alternative forest management planning strategies incorporating timber,water and carbon values:anexamination of their interactions[J].Environmental Modeling & Assessment,2009,14(4):467-480. |
| [12] | 张沁雨,王海宾,彭道黎,等.基于基准样地法和国产高分数据的湖南省森林植被碳储量估测[J].应用生态学报,2019,30(10):3385-3394. |
| [13] | 秦安臣,刘健国,王棋,等.秋千沟林场森林收获调整的多目标决策[J].林业资源管理,1996,(2):32-41. |
| [14] | 姜昕,李纪生,张兴.基于最优轮伐期模型的超限额采伐现象及其约束机制分析[J].世界林业研究,2015,28(4):12-16. |
| [15] | 戎建涛,雷相东,张会儒,等.兼顾碳贮量和木材生产目标的森林经营规划研究[J].西北林学院学报,2012,27(2):155-162. |
| [16] | Baskent E Z,Keles S,Yolasigmaz H A.Comparing multipurpose forest management with timber management,incorporating timber,carbon and oxygen values:A case study[J].Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research,2008,23(2):105-120. |
| [17] | 方精云,刘国华,徐嵩龄. 我国森林植被的生物量和净生产量[J]. 生态学报,1996(5):497-508. |
| [18] | 亢新刚,黄庆丰. 五道河林场次生用材林龄级结构调整及评价[J]. 北京林业大学学报,2001(3):52-55. |
| [19] | 郭菊兰,高尚仁. 铁桥林场森林资源平衡率分析及预测[J]. 北京林业大学学报,2000(5):28-32. |
| [20] | Cheng Jianzhong,Lee Xinqing,Theng B K G, et al.Biomass accumulation and carbon sequestration in an age-sequence of Zanthoxylum bungeanum plantations under the Grain for Green Program in karst regions,Guizhou province[J].Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2015,203:88-95. |
| [21] | 李婷婷,陆元昌,刘宪钊,等.目标规划与轮伐公式确定森林收获的比较分析[J].林业科学研究,2014,27(1):38-44. |
| [22] | 董灵波,孙云霞,刘兆刚.基于碳和木材目标的森林空间经营规划研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2017,39(1):52-61. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |