欢迎访问林草资源研究
科学研究

不同龄组杉木生态公益林土壤肥力综合评价

  • 孙宇 ,
  • 李际平 ,
  • 曹小玉 ,
  • 徐占勇
展开
  • 中南林业科技大学 林学院,长沙 410004
孙宇(1993-),女,湖北恩施人,在读硕士,主要从事森林经理研究。Email: 784433752@qq.com

收稿日期: 2018-11-19

  修回日期: 2018-12-05

  网络出版日期: 2020-09-25

基金资助

国家“十二五”科技支撑项目(2012BAD22B0505)

Comprehensive Evaluation of Soil Fertility of Cunninghamia lanceolata Ecological Public Welfare Forests in Different Age Groups

  • Yu SUN ,
  • Jiping LI ,
  • Xiaoyu CAO ,
  • Zhanyong XU
Expand
  • College of Forestry,Central South University of Forestry and Technology,Changsha 410004,China

Received date: 2018-11-19

  Revised date: 2018-12-05

  Online published: 2020-09-25

摘要

为了研究不同龄组杉木生态公益林经过改造与未改造林分的土壤肥力情况,以湖南省福寿国有林场幼、中、近熟林3个龄组杉木林为研究对象,采用层次分析法对不同龄组经营样地与对照样地的土壤肥力进行评价。结果表明,福寿林场杉木生态公益林土壤肥力评价的3个准则层因子权重分别为:土壤环境条件(0.106 2)、土壤物理性状(0.206 5)、土壤养分(0.633 3),18块样地中土壤肥力等级为差的样地有9个,9个样地均为对照样地,中等的样地8个,均为经营样地,等级为良的样地1个,无极差和优的样地,差、中等和良的样地所占比例分别为50%,44.4%和5.6%。3个龄组中土壤肥力得分为中龄林>近熟林>幼龄林,各龄组对照样地和经营样地得分情况差异显著,经营样地土壤肥力得分高于对照样地,说明通过间伐抚育,补植乡土树种能够提高土壤肥力。

本文引用格式

孙宇 , 李际平 , 曹小玉 , 徐占勇 . 不同龄组杉木生态公益林土壤肥力综合评价[J]. 林草资源研究, 2019 , 0(1) : 57 -62 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2019.01.010

Abstract

In order to study the soil fertility between the transformed and untransformed stands of Cunninghamia lanceolata ecological public welfare forests in different age groups,the young,middle-aged and near mature forest of Cunninghamia lanceolata in Fushou Forest State-owned Farm of Hunan Province was taken as object of study and the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) was used to evaluate the soil fertility of management plot and control plot in different age groups.The results showed that the three criteria of the soil fertility evaluation of Cunninghamia lanceolata ecological public welfare forest in Fushou Forest Farm are soil environmental conditions(0.106 2),soil physical properties(0.206 5) and soil nutrients(0.633 3). There were 9 sample plots with poor level soil fertility grades in 18 plots,all of which were control sample plots,and 8 plots were middle level,all of which were management plots,with a good level plot,there were no poor and excellent level plots,and the proportions of poor,medium and good level plots were 50%,44.4% and 5.6% respectively.The soil fertility scores of the three age groups were middle-aged forest > near-mature forest > young forest,and the scores of the control plots and the management plots of the different age groups were significantly different.The soil fertility scores of the management plots were higher than the control plots,showing that thinning and replanting of native tree species can improve soil fertility.

参考文献

[1] 马祥庆, 黄宝龙. 人工林地力衰退研究综述[J].南京林业大学学报, 1997(2):79-84.
[2] 曹小玉, 李际平, 闫文德. 杉木林改造前后的土壤肥力对比分析及综合评价[J]. 土壤通报, 2016,47(5):1231-1237.
[3] 黄馨, 刘君昂, 周国英, 等. 海南省土沉香人工林土壤肥力评价研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2014,34(8):64-68.
[4] 肖慈英, 阮宏华, 屠六邦. 下蜀主要森林土壤肥力的灰色关联分析与评价[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版, 2000(S1):59-63.
[5] 覃其云, 曹继钊, 李军, 等. 马尾松人工幼林土壤肥力变化及其综合评价研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2013,33(3):64-69.
[6] 纪浩, 董希斌. 大兴安岭低质林改造后土壤肥力综合评价[J]. 林业科学, 2012,48(11):117-123.
[7] 毛波, 董希斌, 宋启亮, 等. 低质山杨林生态改造后土壤肥力综合评价[J]. 福建林业科技, 2015,42(2):40-45.
[8] 臧润国, 朱春全, 雷静品, 等. 可持续经营框架下阔叶红松林区生物多样性间接评价体系的研究[J]. 生物多样性, 1999,7(3):189-196.
[9] 谢肖昀. 南方杉木生态公益林多功能评价研究[D]. 长沙:中南林业科技大学, 2015.
[10] 王树力, 沈海燕, 孙悦, 等. 长白落叶松纯林改造对林地土壤性质的影响[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2009,7(6):98-103.
[11] 傅家齐. 马尾松疏林地套种木荷对林分生长和土壤性质的影响[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2012,18(13):126-127.
文章导航

/