根河地区森林火灾后生态现状评价指标体系构建
收稿日期: 2017-07-13
修回日期: 2017-09-27
网络出版日期: 2020-09-24
基金资助
内蒙古科技计划项目(20130435);国家自然科学基金项目(41563006)
Establishment of Evaluation Index System for Ecological Status of Forest Fires in Genhe Based on Correlation and Principal Component Analysis
Received date: 2017-07-13
Revised date: 2017-09-27
Online published: 2020-09-24
森林火灾的发生,在很多情况下是不可避免的,但森林火灾过后的生态状况,对于灾后生态恢复以及相关林业活动却有着重要意义,因此构建森林火灾后生态现状评价指标体系就显得尤为重要。选择根河地区森林火灾后的生态系统作为研究对象,通过对国内外各类生态系统评价指标体系的构建方式进行分析,以及对指标的文献筛选、频度统计、可行性理论分析和敏感性分析,初步构建了以森林火灾后生态恢复现状评价为目标,以生产力、更新能力、土壤条件、微生物因子、气象与立地条件和生物多样性为要素层,由23个指标构成的根河地区森林火灾后生态现状评价体系,并运用熵权法确定指标体系中各项指标的权重。这种将定性分析与定量分析相结合进行指标体系建立的方法可以达到使用最少的指标反映最大量原始信息的目的。研究思路和方法在一定程度上丰富了森林生态系统评价研究理论与方法体系。
石亮 , 周梅 , 冯倩倩 , 王梓璇 , 贺敏 , 赵鹏武 . 根河地区森林火灾后生态现状评价指标体系构建[J]. 林草资源研究, 2017 , 0(5) : 93 -100 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2017.05.016
The occurrence of forest fires is unavoidable in many cases,but the understanding of ecological status after forest fires is of great significance for post-disaster ecological restoration and related forestry activities.Therefore,it is very important to construct an ecological status evaluation index system of forest fire.After analyzing the construction methods of the evaluation index system of ecosystems at home and abroad,this paper has chosen the forest ecosystem disturbedby forest fire disturbance as the research object.Through the index selection,frequency statistics,feasibility analysis and sensitivity,the evaluation of ecological status of forest ecosystems after forest fires was preliminarily established,which was constructed by productivity,regeneration capacity,soil conditions,microbial factors,site conditions and biodiversity,and 23 indicators of post-forest fire ecosystem assessment system.We use the entropy method to determine the indicators of the weight of the indicators.This method,which combines qualitative analysis with quantitative analysis,can achieve the goal of using the least indexes to reflect the maximum amount of original information.The application of this research idea and method should enrich the theory and method system of forest ecosystem evaluation research to a certain extent.
Key words: index system; forest fire; index screening
| [1] | 刘世荣, 代力民, 温远光, 等. 面向生态系统服务的森林生态系统经营:现状、挑战与展望[J].生态学报, 2015(1):1-9. |
| [2] | 刘晓光. 城市绿地系统规划评价指标体系的构建与优化[D]. 南京:南京林业大学, 2015. |
| [3] | 周晓蔚. 河口生态系统健康与水环境风险评价理论方法研究[D]. 北京:华北电力大学, 2008. |
| [4] | 祁帆, 李晴新, 朱琳. 海洋生态系统健康评价研究进展[J].海洋通报, 2007(3):97-104. |
| [5] | Cairns J, Pratt J R. The Relationship Between Ecosystem Health and Delivery of Ecosystem Services[J]. Evaluating and Monitoring the Health of Large-Scale Ecosustems, 1995,28:63-76 |
| [6] | 张丽谦. 北京山地森林生态脆弱性评价的研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2011. |
| [7] | 严密, 张启翔, 刘雁琪, 等. 福州国家森林公园生态环境质量评测研究[J].河北林业技术, 2005(2):4-6. |
| [8] | 战金艳, 闫海明, 邓祥征, 等. 森林生态系统恢复力评价——以江西省莲花县为例[J].自然资源学报, 2012(8):1304-1315. |
| [9] | Rapport D J, Costanza R, McMichael A J.Assessing ecosystem health[J]. Trends in ecology & evolution, 1998,13(10):397-402. |
| [10] | 石亮, 周梅, 王鼎, 等. 林火干扰对兴安落叶松林下植被多样性和生物量的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2016,44(1):44-47. |
| [11] | 范柏乃, 单世涛, 陆长生. 城市技术创新能力评价指标筛选方法研究[J]. 科学研究, 2002,20(6):663-668 |
| [12] | 周勇, 田有国, 任意, 等. 定量化土地评价指标体系及评价方法探讨[J]. 生态环境, 2003,12(1):37-41. |
| [13] | 吕怀珍, 统计学原理与实务[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2015. |
| [14] | Lal R. Forest soils and carbon sequestration[J]. Forest ecology and management, 2005,220(1):242-258. |
| [15] | Hyodo F, Kusaka S, Wardle D A, et al. Changes in stable nitrogen and carbon isotope ratios of plants and soil across a boreal forest fire chronosequence[J]. Plant and soil, 2013,367(1-2):111-119. |
| [16] | Guénon R, Gros R. Increasing the maturity of compost used affects the soil chemical properties and the stability of microbial activity along a mediterranean post-fire chronosequence[J]. European Journal of Soil Biology, 2015,66:1-10. |
| [17] | 袁菲, 张星耀, 梁军. 基于干扰的汪清林区森林生态系统健康评价[J].生态学报, 2013(12):3722-373. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |