高寒沙地优势防护林筛选研究
收稿日期: 2017-07-24
修回日期: 2017-09-27
网络出版日期: 2020-09-24
基金资助
林业公益性行业科研专项“青海共和盆地典型固沙植物根系特征及功能研究”(201504420);国家自然科学基金项目(31670706);国家自然科学基金项目(31600585)
The Selection of the Most Suitable Shelter Forest Types for Alpine Sandy Land
Received date: 2017-07-24
Revised date: 2017-09-27
Online published: 2020-09-24
冯莉莉 , 贾志清 , 李清雪 , 何凌仙子 , 杨凯悦 . 高寒沙地优势防护林筛选研究[J]. 林草资源研究, 2017 , 0(5) : 45 -51 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2017.05.009
The selection of the most suitable shelter forest types for alpine sandy land has great significance to controlling sandy land in this region.In this study,ecological service function assessment of different alpine sandy land shelter forest types was conducted in order to select the most suitable shelter forest type for this special area.Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP)was used to evaluate the ecological service function of alpine sandy land shelter forest based on data obtained from Qinghai Gonghe Desert Ecosystem Research Station and expert knowledge.Selections of Caragana intermedia and Caragana Korshinskii from Artemisia desertorum,Caragana intermedia and Caragana Korshinskii on moving sand dune and Salix cheilophila and mixed forest of Salix cheilophila with Salix psammophila from Leymus secalinus,Tamarix chinensis,Salix cheilophila,mixed forest of Salix cheilophila with Salix psammophila and mixed forest of Salix cheilophila with Populus simonii on the interdune were taken as the most suitable shelter forest types for alpine sandy land.
| [1] | 刘海涛, 贾志清, 朱雅娟, 等. 高寒沙地不同林龄乌柳的水分生理特性及叶性状[J]. 应用生态学报, 2012,23(9):2370-2376. |
| [2] | 刘丽颖, 贾志清, 朱雅娟, 等. 高寒沙地不同林龄中间锦鸡儿的水分利用策略[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2012,26(5):119-125. |
| [3] | 于洋, 贾志清, 朱雅娟, 等. 高寒沙地植被恢复区乌柳人工防护林对土壤的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2013,49(11):9-15. |
| [4] | 朱雅娟, 李虹, 赵淑伶, 等. 共和盆地不同类型防护林的改善小气候效应[J].中国沙漠, 2014(34):841-848. |
| [5] | 李海东, 沈渭寿, 刘波, 等. 西藏高寒河谷沙地不同演替阶段植被的高光谱特征[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2014,30(4):521-525. |
| [6] | Saaty T L. The analytic hierarchy process:planning,priority setting,resources allocation[J]. New York:McGraw, 1980. |
| [7] | Ramanathan R. A note on the use of the analytic hierarchy process for environmental impact assessment[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2001,63(1):27-35. |
| [8] | Ismail W K W, Abdullah L, Zhang J, et al. A new environmental performance index using analytic hierarchy process:A case of ASEAN countries[J]. Environmental Skeptics and Critics, 2012. |
| [9] | Bottero M, Comino E, Riggio V. Application of the analytic hierarchy process and the analytic network process for the assessment of different wastewater treatment systems[J]. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2011,26(10):1211-1224. |
| [10] | 舒丹丹, 杜青辉. 层次分析法在沙颍河流域水量分配中的应用[J].河南水利与南水北调, 2017(5):87-88. |
| [11] | 王弛. 层次分析法在水资源承载力评估中的应用[J]. 东北水利水电, 2017,35(3):47-50. |
| [12] | 邓须军, 黄芷妍. 基于层次分析法的海南森林资源健康评价研究[J]. 生态经济, 2017,33(6):201-204. |
| [13] | 刘宇恒, 邓辉, 熊倩莹. 基于层次分析法的茂县斜坡地质灾害易发性评价[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2017,34(5):31-35. |
| [14] | 温亮, 游珍, 林裕梅, 等. 基于层次分析法的土地资源承载力评价——以宁国市为例[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2017,38(3):1-6. |
| [15] | 文光菊, 邓文杰, 杨乐, 等. 基于层次分析法的重庆山区矿山泥石流潜势度评价[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 2017,28(2):92-96. |
| [16] | 张成凤, 粟晓玲, 蔡焕杰. 基于区间层次分析法的榆阳区水资源配置系统和谐性评价研究[J]. 自然资源学报, 2017,32(6):1053-1063. |
| [17] | 梁存利. 模糊层次分析法在西藏草地退化研究中的应用[J].草地学报, 2017(1):172-177. |
| [18] | Saaty T L. Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytic hierarchy process[M]. Rws Publications, 2000. |
| [19] | 王晓光, 王珠娜, 余雪标, 等. 退耕还林生态效益评价指标体系研究[J].防护林科技, 2006(6):51-53. |
| [20] | 刘军利, 秦富仓, 岳永杰, 等. 内蒙古伊金霍洛旗风沙区退耕还林还草生态效益评价[J]. 水土保持研究, 2013,20(5):104-107. |
| [21] | Feng H R, Lim C W, Chen L Q, et al. Sustainable Deforestation Evaluation Model and System Dynamics Analysis[J]. The Scientific World Journal, 2014. |
| [22] | 李清雪. 共和盆地沙漠化土地典型人工植被的土壤改良效应[D]. 北京:中国林业科学研究院, 2014. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
