欢迎访问林草资源研究
科学研究

抚育经营措施对杉木近熟林生长影响的研究

  • 蒋亚桂 ,
  • 王瑞辉 ,
  • 刘凯利 ,
  • 张斌 ,
  • 焦泽南 ,
  • 刘雨倩 ,
  • 邹涛
展开
  • 1.中南林业科技大学 林学院,长沙 410000
    2.中亚热带林学国家长期科研基地,长沙 410000
蒋亚桂,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为森林培育学。Email:2533088085@qq.com

收稿日期: 2024-12-11

  修回日期: 2025-04-28

  网络出版日期: 2026-01-07

基金资助

国家资助博士后研究人员计划资助“杉木人工林自然整枝的密度调控及其机制”(GZC20233203);中国博士后科学基金资助项目“杉木林全龄组枝条发育及冠层养分转移分配研究”(2024M753702)

Effect of tending management measures on the growth of near-mature forest stand of chinese fir

  • Yagui JIANG ,
  • Ruihui WANG ,
  • Kaili LIU ,
  • Bin ZHANG ,
  • Zenan JIAO ,
  • Yuqian LIU ,
  • Tao ZOU
Expand
  • 1. College of Forestry,Central South University of Forestry and Technology,Changsha 410004,China
    2. National Long-term Scientific Research Base for Forestry in Mid-subtropics,Changsha 410004,China

Received date: 2024-12-11

  Revised date: 2025-04-28

  Online published: 2026-01-07

摘要

突破现行森林抚育技术规程,通过不同强度的抚育采伐+补植经营措施试验,探究抚育经营措施对杉木近熟林生长影响的规律,为优化杉木人工林林分结构、促进杉木人工林全周期经营和大径材培育提供科学依据。以21 a生杉木人工纯林为研究对象,按不同抚育采伐强度设置0%(CK)、20%(T1)、30%(T2)、40%(T3)4个处理,同时补植阔叶树种,各处理3次重复,观察不同处理下杉木和补植树种的生长情况。结果表明,实施抚育经营措施5年间,杉木胸径、树高年均生长量和单木材积、单位面积蓄积年均增长量均表现为T3>T2>T1>CK,各处理差异显著(P<0.05),且随抚育采伐强度增大,杉木林分径阶株数分布曲线峰值向大径阶方向偏移。补植树种花榈木、闽楠、青冈的平均地径、平均树高及地径和树高年均生长量均为T3>T2>T1>CK,各处理差异显著(P<0.05)。高强度抚育采伐(采伐强度40%、保留密度720株/hm2、保留郁闭度0.5)的杉木近熟林生长最佳,3个补植树种中花榈木的生长表现最好。

本文引用格式

蒋亚桂 , 王瑞辉 , 刘凯利 , 张斌 , 焦泽南 , 刘雨倩 , 邹涛 . 抚育经营措施对杉木近熟林生长影响的研究[J]. 林草资源研究, 2025 , 0(3) : 75 -82 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lczyyj.2025.03.009

Abstract

Through tending management measures test with different thinning intensities and replanting in near-mature forest stands of Chinese fir,breaking through the requirements of the current technical regulations for forest tending,we studied the growth effect rule of different tending measures in near-mature Chinese fir forests,so as to optimize the stand structure transformation and promote full-cycle forest management and large diameter class timber cultivation of Chinese fir plantation forest.With a 21-year-old pure Chinese fir plantation as the research object,four treatments of 0%(CK),20%(T1),30%(T2)and 40%(T3)were set according to the thinning intensity on the basis of the number of trees combined with the replanting of broad-leaved tree species.Each treatment was repeated by three times to observe the growth of Chinese fir and replanted tree species under different treatments.The results indicate that,during five years after tending management measures,all of the average annual growth amounts of the DBH and tree height of Chinese fir,as well as the average annual growth amounts of individual tree volume and growing stock volume per unit area,show the order of T3>T2>T1>CK and the differences among the treatments are significant(P<0.05).Meanwhile,with the increase of the thinning intensity,the distribution curve of the number of trees in each diameter class of the Chinese fir forest stand shifted towards the larger diameter classes.For the replanted tree species including Ormosia henryi,Phoebe bournei,and Cyclobalanopsis glauca,the average ground diameter,average tree height,and the average annual growth amounts of ground diameter and tree height all show the order of T3>T2>T1>CK,and the differences among the treatments are significant(P<0.05).The growth of the nearly mature Chinese fir forest with high-intensity tending felling(felling intensity of 40%,retained density of 720 ind.hm2,and retained canopy density of 0.5)is the best.Among the three supplementary planted tree species,Ormosia henryi shows the best growth performance.

参考文献

[1] 国家林业和草原局. 中国森林资源报告(2014—2018)[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2019.
[2] 彭舜磊, 王得祥, 赵辉, 等. 我国人工林现状与近自然途径探讨[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2008, 23(2):184-188.
[3] 夏丽丹, 于姣妲, 邓玲玲, 等. 杉木人工林地力衰退研究进展[J]. 世界林业研究, 2018, 31(2):37-42.
[4] 陈莹莹. 间伐补植阔叶树大苗对杉木人工林生长的影响[D]. 长沙: 中南林业科技大学, 2017.
[5] 许冰, 李宝福, 郑耀三, 等. 桉树择伐后套种3种阔叶树的生长及土壤理化性状效应分析[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2019, 39(4):47-51.
[6] 林惠章, 郭孝玉, 欧阳勋志, 等. 飞播马尾松纯林补植木荷后土壤酶活性与土壤养分变化[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2015, 43(7):136-139.
[7] 谢锦, 闫巧玲, 张婷. 间伐对日本落叶松人工林林下更新木本植物组成和生长影响的时间效应[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(8):2481-2490.
[8] 曾思齐, 欧阳君祥. 马尾松低质低效次生林分类技术研究[J]. 中南林学院学报, 2002, 22(2):12-16.
[9] 徐云岩, 宫渊波, 付万权, 等. 川南马尾松低效林不同改造措施对土壤碳、氮特征及其碳稳定性的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2016, 30(1):225-230.
[10] 张海涛, 宫渊波, 付万权, 等. 川南马尾松低效人工林不同改造模式后枯落物持水特性分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 2016, 30(4):136-141.
[11] 彭检贵. 不同发育阶段马尾松人工林经营效果动态分析[J]. 林业资源管理, 2020(1):62-69.
[12] 国家林业局. 森林抚育规程:GB/T 15781—2015[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2015.
[13] 许冠军, 郑宏, 林开敏, 等. 间伐密度管理模式对杉木大径材生长的影响[J]. 福建农林大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 48(6):753-759.
[14] 周钰淮, 王瑞辉, 刘凯利, 等. 抚育间伐对川西柳杉人工林生长和林下植被多样性的影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2022, 42(6):65-74.
[15] 刘建中, 曾素平, 姜春前, 等. 密度调控对杉木人工林及套种阔叶树生长的影响[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2023, 29(13):71-77.
[16] 王磊, 温远光, 周晓果, 等. 尾巨桉与红锥混交对林下植被和土壤性质的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(7):1340-1349.
[17] 田晓, 刘苑秋, 魏晓华, 等. 模拟楠木杉木人工混交林不同混交比例对净生产力和碳储量的影响[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2014, 36(1):122-130.
[18] YANG Fangfang, LI Yuelin, ZHOU Guoyi, et al. Dynamics of coarse woody debris and decomposition rates in an old-growth forest in lower tropical China[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2010, 259(8):1666-1672.
[19] FORD K R, BRECKHEIMER J K, FRANKLIN J F, et al. Competition alters tree growth response to climate at individual and stand scales[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2017, 47(1):53-62.
[20] 江怡航, 胡宇欣, 刘振华, 等. 杉楠不同近自然改造模式对杉木林分生长及材种出材量的影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2024, 44(12):51-58.
文章导航

/