欢迎访问林草资源研究
科学研究

采煤塌陷地不同恢复年限樟子松林林下土壤种子库演变特征

  • 杜华栋 ,
  • 薛一敏 ,
  • 毕银丽 ,
  • 唐勋 ,
  • 孙浩
展开
  • 1.西安科技大学 地质与环境学院,西安 710054
    2.西安科技大学 西部矿山生态环境修复研究院,西安 710054
    3.陕西省煤炭绿色开发地质保障重点实验室,西安 710054
杜华栋,副教授,硕士生导师,博士,研究方向为植被恢复与生态治理。Email:dddhhhddd@126.com

收稿日期: 2024-11-05

  修回日期: 2025-05-28

  网络出版日期: 2026-01-07

基金资助

国家重点研发计划课题“ 西部干旱区煤能源基地区域生态保护与资源综合利用技术”(2022YFF13033030);陕西省自然科学基础研究计划资助项目“榆神府矿区塌陷地植被更新制约机制及引导型自修复方案构建”(2025JC-YBMS-307)

Soil seed bank dynamics in Pinus sylvestris var.mongholica pine forests in coal mining subsidence areas and their effects on vegetation restoration

  • Huadong DU ,
  • Yimin XUE ,
  • Yinli BI ,
  • Xun TANG ,
  • Hao SUN
Expand
  • 1. College of Geology & Environment,Xi'an University of Science and Technology,Xi'an 710054,China
    2. Western Mine Ecological Environment Rehabilitation Research Institute,Xi'an University of Science and Technology,Xi'an 710054,China
    3. Shaanxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Geological Support for Coal Green Exploitation,Xi'an 710054,China

Received date: 2024-11-05

  Revised date: 2025-05-28

  Online published: 2026-01-07

摘要

分析采煤塌陷地人工林土壤种子库组成与多样性特征及其对林下植被更新的影响,可为塌陷地人工林的提质增效提供科学依据。以榆神府矿区采煤塌陷地不同恢复年限(1~2 a、3~5 a、6~10 a、11~15 a)的樟子松林为研究对象,分析其土壤种子库的密度、组成和多样性演变特征,探讨其土壤种子库与林下植被的耦合关系,并识别其关键生态影响因子。结果表明:1)塌陷地樟子松林土壤种子库的物种组成由恢复1~2 a的一年生草本植物,向恢复11~15 a的多年生草本转变。2)土壤种子库密度在恢复3~5 a时最高(196粒/m2),随后随恢复年限增加呈下降趋势。各主要科的植物种子库密度达到峰值的时间不同,藜科在恢复1~2 a时最高(97粒/m2)、禾本科在恢复3~5 a时最高(86 粒/m2)、菊科在恢复6~10 a时最高(78粒/m2)、豆科在恢复11~15 a时最高(35粒/m2)。3)土壤种子库物种丰富度指数随恢复年限呈先增后降趋势,在恢复6~10 a时达到最大值,而均匀度指数和多样性指数在各恢复阶段无显著变化。4)土壤种子库与林下植被之间的物种相似性在恢复1~2 a时最低,共有物种为9种,以一年生草本植物为主;在恢复3~5 a时达到最大值(0.48),共有物种为12种,包括一年生和多年生植物;在恢复6~10 a和11~15 a时共有物种分别有11和10种,以多年生草本植物为主。5)林下植被地上生物量、土壤含水率和全氮是影响不同恢复年限樟子松林下种子库密度、多样性和林下植被与土壤种子库相似性的共同因子;恢复1~2 a的樟子松林下土壤容重和林下植被盖度、恢复3~5 a的林下植株密度和土壤有机质、恢复6~10 a的枯落层厚度和枯落物盖度、恢复11~15 a的土壤结皮厚度是影响土壤种子库的主要差异性因子。樟子松林生长初期,土壤种子库特征主要受林下植被和土壤性质影响,随着林分发育,林下枯落物积累和结皮对土壤种子库影响逐渐增加。采煤塌陷地樟子松林在恢复10 a后,土壤种子库密度和多样性降低,对林下植被更新的贡献亦降低,因此,可通过补充土壤种子库和优化生境等措施,促进樟子松林下植被更新,提高林下植被的生态效益。

本文引用格式

杜华栋 , 薛一敏 , 毕银丽 , 唐勋 , 孙浩 . 采煤塌陷地不同恢复年限樟子松林林下土壤种子库演变特征[J]. 林草资源研究, 2025 , 0(3) : 54 -63 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lczyyj.2025.03.007

Abstract

Characterizing the composition and diversity of soil seed banks in artificial forests within coal mining subsidence areas,along with their effects on understory vegetation regeneration,provide a scientific foundation for the quality and efficiency management of plantation forests in coal mining subsidence land.Taking Pinus sylvestris var. mongholica forests with differentrestoration years(1-2,3-5,6-10 and 11-15 years)in the coal mining subsidence land in the Yushenfu mining area as the research subject,we characterized the evolutionary characteristics of soil seed bank density,composition,and diversity;deciphered the coupling relationships between the soil seed bank and aboveground vegetation;and investigated ecological drivers regulating soil seed bank features through monitoring edaphic factors,understory plant communities,and litter traits.The results showed that:1)The species composition of the soil seed bank shifted from being dominated by annual plants at 1-2 years of restoration to predominantly perennial plants after 11-15 years of recovery.2)The soil seed bank density peakedat 196 seeds/m2 in years 3-5,but soil seed bank density progressively declined with the increasing stand age.The densities of Chenopodiaceae,Poaceae,Asteraceae,and Fabaceae plants reached their maximum values at 97 seeds/m2 for 1-2 years,86 seeds/m2 for 3-5 years,78 seeds/m2 for 6-10 years,and 35 seeds/m2 for 11-15 years,respectively.3)The species richness index of the soil seed bank initially increased then decreased with stand age,peaking at 6-10 years,while the Pielou evenness index and Shannon-Wiener diversity index exhibited no statistically significant changes.4)The species similarity between the understory soil seed bank and aboveground vegetation was the lowest in 1-2 years of restoration,with 9 common species of annual plants;the similarity reached a maximum value of 0.48 in 3-5 years of restoration,with a total of 12 species including both annual and biennualplants and perennial plants;and there were 11 and 10 common species in years of 6-10 and 11-15,respectively,dominated by perennialplants.5)Aboveground vegetation biomass,soil water content and total nitrogen were the common factors affecting understory soil seed density,diversity and similarity of aboveground vegetation and soil seed bank in different restoration years.In addition,soil capacity and aboveground vegetation cover in 1-2 years,aboveground vegetation density and soil organic matter in 3-5 years,litter layer thickness and cover in 6-10 years,and soil crust thickness in 11-15 years were also the heterogeneous main factors affecting understory soil seed banks in Pinus sylvestris var. mongholica forestry,the characteristics of the soil seed bank in the early succession stage of Pinus sylvestris var. mongholica forests were primarily influenced by aboveground vegetation and soil properties.As community succession progresses,the accumulation of understory litter and the formation of biological crusts exert increasing influence on the soil seed bank.In Pinus sylvestris var. mongholica forests of coal mining subsidence areas,both density and diversity of the soil seed bank decline after 10 years of succession,leading to reduced understory vegetation regeneration,seed bank supplementation and habitat optimization can effectively enhance understory vegetation recovery and improve its ecological functions.

参考文献

[1] 周甲男, 马苏, 郑颖娟, 等. 基于生态产品价值视角的矿区植被恢复成效评估:以神东矿区为例[J]. 环境科学研究, 2023, 36(9):1728-1736.
[2] 强海洋. 自然保护地矿业开发与治理实践探索研究[J]. 环境保护, 2019, 47(增刊):55-61.
[3] CONG Zicheng. Study on the impact of mining on ecological environment and the core of ecological restoration in Mining Areas[J]. Academic Journal of Environment & Earth Science, 2024, 6:30-33.
[4] 刘英, 雷少刚, 陈孝杨, 等. 神东矿区植被覆盖度时序变化与驱动因素分析及引导恢复策略[J]. 煤炭学报, 2021, 46(10):3319-3331.
[5] FENG Haibo, ZHOU Jianwei, ZHOU Aiguo, et al. Spatiotemporal variation indicators for vegetation landscape stability and processes monitoring of semiarid grassland coal mine areas[J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2022, 33:3-17.
[6] 党宏忠, 陈帅, 钟鹏, 等. 樟子松人工林自然更新过程中断的机制及可能调控途径[J]. 林业科学, 2024, 60(12):158-167.
[7] 陆海飞, 徐建民, 李光友, 等. 尾巨桉林不同生长发育阶段的土壤理化性质与林下植物多样性的动态变化趋势及其规律[J]. 林业科学研究, 2024, 37(1):82-91.
[8] YAN Yumei, FAN Zexin, FU Peili, et al. Drought tolerance traits explain differential stem growth rates of evergreen and deciduous trees in a tropical karst forest[J]. Plant Diversity, 2025, 47(3):454-465.
[9] 胡尔查, 王铮, 李梓豪, 等. 毛乌素沙地不同林龄樟子松人工林林下植物多样性和生物量的动态变化[J]. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(11):3246-3254.
[10] 王国东, 张静, 孙翠焕. 基于露天矿区的林草植被修复模式探究[J]. 水土保持应用技术, 2024(1):43-44.
[11] 曹雪峰, 行仙峰, 徐佳, 等. 神东矿区不同治理年限樟子松群落特征分析[J]. 中国水土保持, 2022(5):56-59.
[12] 刘世增, 严子柱, 安富博. 远源引种樟子松对荒漠区气候及土壤盐碱离子适应性分析[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2004, 18(2):156-160.
[13] 谷金锋, 蔡体久, 杨业. 高寒山区采矿迹地植被恢复研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2014, 28(3):29-36.
[14] HORTA B M, RIBEIROC M S, MAS F J, et al. Land Cover Patterns of Urban Lots and Their Contribution to Ecological Functions[J]. Sustainability, 2024, 16(7):3063.
[15] 李振瑜, 耿召坤, 赵善超, 等. 天山云杉林地上植被与土壤种子库物种相似性[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9):2230-2236.
[16] LYU Leting, BI Siqi, YANG Yong, et al. Effects of vegetation distribution and landscape pattern on water conservation in the Dongjiang River basin[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2023, 155:111017.
[17] PRIYANKA K, W J N, ALBERT B, et al. Arid Ecosystem Vegetation Canopy-Gap Dichotomy:Influence on Soil Microbial Composition and Nutrient Cycling Functional Potential[J]. Applied and environmental microbiology, 2020, 87(5):e02780-20.
[18] LIU Bingbing, YU Pengtao, WANG Xiao, et al. Tradeoffs between Stand Volume and Understory Vegetation Diversity in Quercuswutaishanica Forests under Climate Change[J]. Forests, 2024, 15(10):1750-1750.
[19] YU Yang, ZHU Ruipeng, LIU Dianjun, et al. Understanding the balance between soil conservation and soil water storage capacity during the process of vegetation restoration in semi-arid watersheds in the Loess Plateau,China[J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2023, 34(18):5805-5815.
[20] 段文军, 李达, 李冲. 5种不同林龄尾巨桉人工林林下植物多样性及其影响因素分析[J]. 生态环境学报, 2022, 31(5):857-864.
[21] KARAF, ?IFTCI A, SAVACI G. Light transmittance and understory junipers influence the survival and growth of seedlings and litter decomposition in black pine forests[J]. New Forests, 2023, 55:1065-1081.
[22] ALI A, LIN Siliang, HE Jiekun, et al. Climate and soils determine aboveground biomass indirectly via species diversity and stand structural complexity in tropical forests[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2019, 432:823-831.
[23] IDDRISU Q A, HAO Yuanqing, ISSIFU H, et al. Effects of Stand Density on Tree Growth,Diversity of Understory Vegetation,and Soil Properties in a Pinuskoraiensis Plantation[J]. Forests, 2024, 15(7):1149-1149.
[24] DOU Haojun, HOU Ling, HU Mingjie, et al. Scatter-hoarding rodents are important seed dispersers in pine plantations[J]. Global Ecology and Conservation, 2024, 50:50e02840.
[25] 张洋洋, 周清慧, 许骄阳, 等. 林分密度对马尾松林下植物与土壤种子库多样性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(7):2355-2362.
[26] MELESEB, SEBSEBE D, TAMRAT B, et al. Soil seed bank distribution and restoration potential in the vegetation of Buska Mountain range,Hamar district,southwestern Ethiopia[J]. Heliyon, 2022, 8:e11244.
[27] 林雅超, 郭小平, 李文烨, 等. 煤矿排矸场对周边土壤种子库及植被分布格局的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(1):95-101.
[28] 周来. 落叶松天然林灌草多样性对林分乔木特征的响应[J]. 森林与环境学报, 2023, 43(1):44-51.
[29] 宋鸽. 科尔沁沙地南缘樟子松人工林土壤种子库及天然更新特征[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2018.
[30] 方祥, 王东丽, 李佳, 等. 围封对固沙樟子松林土壤种子库的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2020, 37(4):635-644.
[31] 张亦扬, 强于鲜, 李萌津, 等. 榆神府矿区采煤塌陷地植被群落恢复演替特征[J]. 绿色科技, 2019(6):65-66.
[32] 杜华栋, 谢姗姗, 毕银丽, 等. 半干旱矿区采动地裂缝发育对幼苗库及其建植因子影响[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2024, 52(2):350-362
[33] 贺卫中, 向茂西, 刘海南, 等. 榆神府矿区地面塌陷特征及环境问题[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2016, 44(5):131-135.
[34] 王双明, 杜华栋, 王生全. 神木北部采煤塌陷区土壤与植被损害过程及机理分析[J]. 煤炭学报, 2017, 42(1):17-26.
[35] 孙瑜硕, 常选选, 张雪, 等. 腾格里沙漠东南缘不同植被类型土壤种子库多样性[J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(9):2356-2362.
[36] 赵凌平, 程积民, 王占彬. 持久种子库在黄土高原植被恢复中的作用[J]. 草业科学, 2013, 30(1):104-109.
[37] CHEN Xin, WANG Yujue, WANG Yao, et al. A Natural moisture gradient affects soil fungal communities on the south shore of Hulun Lake,Inner Mongolia,China[J]. Journal of fungi(Basel,Switzerland), 2023, 9:549.
[38] 尚浩博. 资源环境常规分析方法[M]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学出版社, 2010.
[39] HOPFENSPERGER K N. A review of similarity between seed bank and standing vegetation across ecosystems[J]. Oikos, 2007, 116:1438-1448.
[40] YOUSAF A, SHABBIR R, JABEEN A, et al. Linkage between herbaceous vegetation and soil characteristics along rawal dam islamabad[J]. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 2016, 16:88-100.
[41] FAB?I?OVá M. VYMYSLICKY T, FREI I, et al. The importance of soil seed banks for biodiversity restoration in degraded grasslands[J]. Folia Geobotanica, 2024, 59:17-37.
[42] PARISA P, BEHNAM H, PARVANEH A, et al. Assessment of soil seed bank characteristics in a mountain grassland of iran[J]. Environmental engineering and management journal, 2021, 20:1025-1034.
[43] 李厚春, 秦浩, 张红, 等. 平朔煤矿复垦区不同人工林草本层植物群落特征[J]. 山西大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 48(3):626-636.DOI:10.13451/j.sxu.ns.2023151.
[44] 缑倩倩, 刘婧, 王国华, 等. 晋西北丘陵风沙区柠条林下草本植物群落组成和种群生态位变化特征[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(22):9069-9090.
[45] TIAN Liang, LIANG Wei, LIU Zhimin, et al. The complexity of vegetation structure decreases the seed-hanging ability of the vegetation layer during secondary wind dispersal[J]. Trees, 2023, 37:1671-1680.
[46] 钱建强, 马群, 刘志民. 西北欧植物区系植物功能性状数据库(LEDA)简介[J]. 生态学杂志, 2016, 35(4):1089-1096.
[47] 周清慧, 黄冠, 陈继豪, 等. 林下凋落物对土壤种子萌发的作用机制[J]. 湖北林业科技, 2019, 48(3):1-5.
[48] 李兴隆, 王道杰, 林勇明, 等. 金沙江干热河谷土壤种子库植被恢复潜力研究[J]. 西南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 35(3):94-98.
[49] 姚佳峰, 郭钰, 董媛, 等. 枯落物厚度对华北落叶松人工林天然更新的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2024, 35(4):1025-1032.
[50] 张雪, 肖波, 韩凤朋. 黄土高原生物结皮对种子出苗及幼苗存活与生长的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2024, 44(20):1-10.
文章导航

/