欢迎访问林草资源研究
科研研究

石灰岩山地不同林龄柏木林土壤理化性质和植物多样性特征

  • 杨宇豪 ,
  • 王灵玲 ,
  • 张勇 ,
  • 张全智 ,
  • 孙晗靖 ,
  • 王文鹏 ,
  • 周本智 ,
  • 王增
展开
  • 1.东北林业大学,哈尔滨 150000
    2.中国林业科学研究院亚热带林业研究所,杭州 311499
    3.杭州市富阳区林业水利局,杭州 311499
    4.浙江省公益林和国有林场管理总站,杭州 310009
    5.杭州市富阳区农业技术推广中心,杭州 311499
杨宇豪,硕士,主要研究方向为生态学。Email:2021115202@nefu.edu.cn

收稿日期: 2024-05-06

  修回日期: 2024-09-26

  网络出版日期: 2025-04-18

基金资助

浙江省科学技术厅领雁计划项目“浙江主要森林类型提质增汇关键技术研究与应用”(2023C02035);杭州市富阳区财政农林专项资金项目“富阳区石灰岩山地国土绿化工程生态效益评价”(2022-96)

Soil Physicochemical Properties and Plant Diversity Characteristics of Cupressus funebris with Different Stand Ages in Limestone Mountain Areas

  • Yuhao YANG ,
  • Lingling WANG ,
  • Yong ZHANG ,
  • Quanzhi ZHANG ,
  • Hanjing SUN ,
  • Wenpeng WANG ,
  • Benzhi ZHOU ,
  • Zeng WANG
Expand
  • 1. Northeast Forestry University,Harbin 150000,China
    2. Research Institute of Subtropical Forestry,Chinese Academy of Forestry,Hangzhou 311400,China
    3. Forestry and Water Conservancy Bureau of Fuyang District,Hangzhou,Hangzhou 311400,China
    4. Zhejiang Provincial Public Welfare Forest and State owned Forest Farm Management Station,Hangzhou 310009,China
    5. Hangzhou Fuyang District Agricultural Technology Extension Center,Hangzho 311400,China

Received date: 2024-05-06

  Revised date: 2024-09-26

  Online published: 2025-04-18

摘要

研究石灰岩山地不同林龄柏木林对土壤理化性质和植物多样性的影响,对石漠化区脆弱生态系统的植被恢复具有重要意义。以浙江省杭州市富阳区的石灰岩山地柏木林为研究对象,分为对照(石灰岩无林地)、幼龄林、中龄林和近熟林4种类型,采用空间代替时间的方法,运用Pearson相关性分析和冗余分析(RDA),探讨不同林龄柏木林对石灰岩山地土壤理化性质与植物多样性的影响。结果表明:1)各林龄柏木林的土壤容重均小于无林地,且土壤的最大持水量、毛管持水量、最小持水量和含水率均高于无林地。中龄林土壤容重最小,持水量最高,幼龄林含水率最高。2)不同林龄柏木林的土壤有机碳、全氮、水解性氮含量均高于无林地,中龄林的含量最高。3)各林龄柏木林的物种丰富度均高于无林地。中龄林在乔木层和草本层的丰富度最高,幼龄林在灌木层的丰富度最高;各林龄柏木林的Simpson优势度指数均高于无林地;幼龄林和中龄林的Shannon-Wiener多样性指数显著高于无林地。4)相关性分析与RDA分析表明,pH值是影响该地区土壤理化性质与植物多样性的主要因子,其次为持水量、容重、含水率、全磷及水解性氮。石灰岩山地柏木林土壤理化性质和植物多样性均显著优于无林地,其中以中龄林的综合表现最佳。柏木对石灰岩山地的土壤改善效果显著,但不同林龄有所差异。

本文引用格式

杨宇豪 , 王灵玲 , 张勇 , 张全智 , 孙晗靖 , 王文鹏 , 周本智 , 王增 . 石灰岩山地不同林龄柏木林土壤理化性质和植物多样性特征[J]. 林草资源研究, 2024 , 0(5) : 106 -115 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lczyyj.2024.05.012

Abstract

The investigation of the impact of Cupressus funebris forests of varying ages on soil physicochemical properties and plant diversity in limestone mountainous regions is of paramount importance for vegetation restoration in fragile ecosystems within rocky desertification zones.Focusing on Cupressus funebris forests in the limestone mountainous areas of Fuyang District,Hangzhou City,Zhejiang Province,China,this study categorized the forests into control(limestone non-stocked land),young forests,middle-aged forests,and near-mature forests.Employing the space-for-time substitution method,along with Pearson correlation analysis and Redundancy Analysis(RDA),the study explored the influence of Cupressus funebris forests of different ages on soil physicochemical properties and plant diversity in limestone mountainous regions.1)The soil bulk density of Cupressus funebris forests of all ages was lower than that of non-stocked land,whereas the maximum water-holding capacity,capillary water-holding capacity,minimum water-holding capacity,and moisture content of the soil,were higher.Among them,middle-aged forests had the lowest soil bulk density and the highest water-holding capacity,while young forests had the highest moisture content.2)The soil organic carbon,total nitrogen,and hydrolyzable nitrogen contents of Cupressus funebris forests of different ages were higher than those of non-stocked land,with middle-aged forests exhibiting the highest contents.3)The species richness of Cupressus funebris forests of all ages was higher than that of non-stocked land.Middle-aged forests exhibited the greatest species richness in both tree and herb layers,whereas young forests showed the greatest richness in the shrub layer.The Simpson dominance index of Cupressus funebris forests of all ages was higher than that of non-stocked land,and the Shannon-Wiener diversity index of young and middle-aged forests was significantly higher than that of non-stocked land.4)Correlation analysis and RDA indicated that pH was the primary factor influencing soil physicochemical properties and plant diversity in the region,followed by water-holding capacity,bulk density,moisture content,total phosphorus,and hydrolyzable nitrogen.In summary,the soil physicochemical properties and plant diversity of Cupressus funebris forests in limestone mountainous regions were significantly superior to those of non-stocked land,with middle-aged forests demonstrating the best overall performance.Cupressus funebris had a significant effect on improving soil in limestone mountainous regions,with effects varying by forest age.

参考文献

[1] 邓伟. 茂兰喀斯特森林地上生物量分布特征及驱动因素[D]. 贵阳: 贵州师范大学, 2023.
[2] KARDOL P, BEZEMER T M, VAN DER PUTTEN W H. Temporal variation in plant-soil feedback controls succession[J]. Ecology Letters, 2006, 9(9):1080-1088.
[3] 邵水仙, 董智, 李红丽, 等. 不同造林模式对退化石灰岩山地土壤理化性质及水文效应的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2015, 29(1):263-267.
[4] 周璟, 张旭东, 周金星, 等. 我国植被恢复对土壤质量的影响研究综述[J]. 世界林业研究, 2009, 22(2):56-61.
[5] 王懿君. 石灰岩山地人工造林和封山育林促进阔叶树天然更新技术[J]. 安徽林业科技, 2020, 46(5):23-25.
[6] 姜沛沛, 曹扬, 陈云明, 等. 不同林龄油松(Pinus tabulaeformis)人工林植物、凋落物与土壤C、N、P化学计量特征[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(19):6188-6197.
[7] 林大仪. 土壤学实验指导[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2004.
[8] 马克平, 刘玉明. 生物群落多样性的测度方法Ⅰα多样性的测度方法(下)[J]. 生物多样性, 1994(4):231-239.
[9] MANEA A, LEISHMAN M R. Soil water content variability drives productivity responses of a model grassland system to extreme rainfall events under elevated[J]. Plant Ecology, 2018, 219(12):1413-1421.
[10] 李红琴, 吴夏璐, 张法伟, 等. 高寒草甸冬季牧场土壤持水能力对草地封育的响应[J]. 中国草地学报, 2021, 43(8):1-8.
[11] 李瑶, 刘冬冬, 车陆禄. 喀斯特山地森林土壤入渗特征对人为踩踏的响应规律[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021, 35(4):96-105.
[12] 程欢, 付雨欣, 董洪君, 等. 川中丘陵区不同植被类型土壤理化性质及水文效应[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2019, 25(4):845-853.
[13] 崔宁洁, 张丹桔, 刘洋, 等. 不同林龄马尾松人工林林下植物多样性与土壤理化性质[J]. 生态学杂志, 2014, 33(10):2610-2617.
[14] 杨志训, 秦连岗. 不同林龄马尾松人工林表层土壤养分特征分析[J]. 林业资源管理, 2014(3):101-104.
[15] NIU Xiaoyun, SUN Xiaomei, CHEN Dongsheng, et al. Soil microorganisms,nutrients and enzyme activity of Larix kaempferi plantation under different ages in mountainous region of eastern Liaoning Province,China[J]. The Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015, 26(9):2663-2672.
[16] 周润惠, 唐永彬, 王敏, 等. 威远不同年龄桉树人工林林下物种多样性和土壤理化性质[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2021, 27(3):742-748.
[17] 马天舒, 丁伟林, 肖复明, 等. 不同年龄阶段陈山红心杉人工林土壤理化性质[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2020, 40(12):114-124.
[18] 盘金文, 郭其强, 孙学广, 等. 不同林龄马尾松人工林碳、氮、磷、钾养分含量及其生态化学计量特征[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(4):746-756.
[19] 杨伟明, 王志滨, 栾士波. 天然杨桦林营养元素归还量与密度效应[J]. 延边大学农学学报, 2002(1):1-4.
[20] 李永强, 赵萌莉, 韩国栋, 等. 不同年限草原撂荒地土壤理化特性研究[J]. 中国草地学报, 2012, 34(3):61-64.
[21] 罗明霞, 胡宗达, 刘兴良, 等. 川西亚高山不同林龄粗枝云杉人工林土壤微生物生物量及酶活性[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(14):5632-5642.
[22] 王龙凤, 肖伟伟, 王树力. 天然次生林人工管理后土壤团聚体稳定性及碳氮分布变化[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2022, 44(7):97-106.
[23] 袁媛, 张鹤, 武杼华, 等. 植被恢复对毛乌素沙地土壤pH和养分含量的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2021, 52(1):148-156.
[24] GAO Tian, HEDBLOM M, EMILSSON T, et al. The role of forest stand structure as biodiversity indicator[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2014,330:82-93.
[25] 张绍聪, 高禾苗, 袁龙义, 等. 西藏不同林龄核桃林土壤理化性质及林下植被多样性特征[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2023, 51(7):115-122.
[26] 杨育林, 李贤伟, 王海明, 等. 抚育间伐对川中丘陵区柏木人工林生长和植物多样性的影响[J]. 山地学报, 2015, 33(2):199-207.
[27] 黎炜彬, 严朝东, 翟欣, 等. 郁闭度对马占相思人工林下植物多样性的影响[J]. 热带林业, 2021, 49(1):4-7.
[28] 康冰, 刘世荣, 蔡道雄, 等. 马尾松人工林林分密度对林下植被及土壤性质的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2009, 20(10):2323-2331.
[29] 王加国. 茂兰喀斯特植被恢复过程水分格局与物种多样性保护研究[D]. 贵阳: 贵州师范大学, 2017.
[30] 陈丝露, 赵敏, 李贤伟, 等. 柏木低效林不同改造模式优势草本植物多样性及其生态位[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(1):143-155.
[31] 庞世龙, 黄小荣, 欧芷阳, 等. 桂南不同植被模式公益林植物多样性与土壤因子的关系[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2015, 35(5):109-113.
[32] 赵景学, 曲广鹏, 多吉顿珠, 等. 藏北高寒植被群落物种多样性与土壤环境因子的关系[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2011, 25(6):105-108.
[33] 陆海飞, 徐建民, 李光友, 等. 尾巨桉林不同生长发育阶段的土壤理化性质与林下植物多样性的动态变化趋势及其规律[J]. 林业科学研究, 2024, 37(1):82-91.
[34] 张沛健, 徐建民, 卢万鸿, 等. 雷州半岛不同林龄尾细桉人工林植物多样性和土壤理化性质分析[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2021, 41(9):96-105.
文章导航

/