欢迎访问林草资源研究
科学研究

祁连山国家级自然保护区森林生态系统服务价值评估

  • 刘炳仓 ,
  • 杨海江
展开
  • 1.兰州天瑞测绘工程有限公司,兰州 730030
    2.兰州大学 资源环境学院,兰州 7300000
刘炳仓,高级工程师,主要研究方向为测绘地理信息技术自然资源领域应用。Email:78006877@qq.com

收稿日期: 2024-04-18

  修回日期: 2024-05-30

  网络出版日期: 2024-12-24

基金资助

中国博士后科学基金项目(国家资助博士后研究人员计划)“气候和土地利用变化对祁连山生态系统服务的耦合影响”(GZC20231003)

Assessment of Forest Ecosystem Services Vlaue in the Qilian Mountain National Nature Reserve

  • Bingcang LIU ,
  • Haijiang YANG
Expand
  • 1. Lanzhou Tianrui Surveying and Mapping Engineering Co.,Ltd,Lanzhou 730030,China
    2. College of Earth and Environmental Sciences,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou 730000,China

Received date: 2024-04-18

  Revised date: 2024-05-30

  Online published: 2024-12-24

摘要

森林生态系统服务价值评估及其变化对森林生态系统的保护和管理具有重要实践意义,可为实现区域经济-社会-生态协同发展提供参考。基于遥感数据和相关测绘数据,利用生态系统服务价值(ESV)核算方法,评估1980—2020年祁连山国家级自然保护区森林生态系统服务功能并预测其变化热点。结果表明:1)祁连山国家级自然保护区森林资源丰富,森林总面积约63.66万hm2,森林覆盖率为14.44%。40年来总体上森林面积呈增加趋势,共增加约1.13万hm2,增长率约1.81%。2)自然保护区森林拥有巨大的生态系统服务价值,从时间变化看,1980—2020年ESV由454.44亿元增长到606.28亿元,增长率达33.41%,呈显著增加趋势;从不同生态系统类型的ESV贡献度看,有林地>灌木林地>疏林地>其他林地;从具体生态系统服务价值看,土壤保持>水源涵养>洪水调蓄>旅游文化服务>固碳>防风固沙>林产品生产。3)从自然保护区生态系统服务功能及价值变化热点区域预测看,调节服务的价值极易受到生态系统变化的影响,易减少的区域约占自然保护区总面积的44.21%,需要引起高度重视。供给服务和文化服务价值变化的热点区域总体上保持稳定。研究结果对祁连山国家级自然保护区森林生态系统评估提供重要的科学参考。

本文引用格式

刘炳仓 , 杨海江 . 祁连山国家级自然保护区森林生态系统服务价值评估[J]. 林草资源研究, 2024 , 0(3) : 18 -24 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lczyyj.2024.03.003

Abstract

The assessment of forest ecosystem service value and its changes is of great practical significance for the protection and management of forest ecosystems,and can provide a reference for achieving regional economic-social-ecological synergistic development.Based on remote sensing data and related mapping data,the ecosystem service value(ESV)accounting method was used to assess the forest ecosystem service function of Qilian Mountain National Nature Reserve and identify its hotspots of change from 1980 to 2020.The results show that:1)Qilian Mountain National Nature Reserve is rich in forest resources,with a total forest area of about 636 600 hm2 and a forest coverage rate of 14.44%.Over time,the overall area has shown an increasing trend over the past 40 years,with a total increase of about 11,300 hm2 and a growth rate of 1.81%.2)The forests in the reserve possess great ecosystem service value,and from the perspective of time change,the ESV increased from 45 444 000 000 Yuan to 60 628 000 000 Yuan from 1980 to 2020,with a growth rate of 33.41%,which has shown an obvious increasing trend.From the perspective of the ESV contribution of different ecosystem types,forested land>shrubland>thin forest land>other forest land.In terms of specific ecosystem service values,soil conservation>water conservation>flood storage>tourism and cultural services>carbon sequestration>windbreaks and sand solidification>forest product production.3)Based on the prediction of hotspot areas of ecosystem service function and value change in the reserve,the value of regulating services is extremely vulnerable to the ecosystem change.The hotspot areas for the value change of provisioning services and cultural services remain stable in general,while areas prone to decrease account for 44.21% of the total protected area,which requires close attention.The results of the study provide important scientific insights for forest ecosystem assessment in Qilian Mountain National Nature Reserve.

参考文献

[1] 杨海江. 祁连山国家级自然保护区生态系统服务评估与适应性管理[D]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2023.
[2] 周雅倩, 李燕. 基于生态系统生产总值(GEP)核算的广西向海经济“两山”转化通道研究[J]. 商业经济, 2021(12):142-145.
[3] BONAN G B. Forests and climate change:Forcings,feedbacks,and the climate benefits of forests[J]. Science, 2008, 320:1444-1449.
[4] PAN Yude, BIRDSEY R A, FANG Jingyun, et al. A large and persistent carbon sink in the world's forests[J]. Science, 2011, 333:988-993.
[5] 金敏艳, 李进军, 车宗玺, 等. 祁连山中部祁连圆柏年内径向生长对气候因子的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(21):7699-7708.
[6] NEMANI R R, KEELING C D, HASHIMOTO H, et al. Climate-driven increases in global terrestrial net primary production from 1982 to 1999[J]. Science, 2003, 300:1560-1563.
[7] ADAMS H D, ZEPPEL M J B, ANDEREGG W R L, et al. A multi-species synthesis of physiological mechanisms in drought-induced tree mortality[J]. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2017, 1:1285-1291.
[8] DUSENGE M E, DUARTE A G, WAY DA. Plant carbon metabolism and climate change:Elevated CO2 and temperature impacts on photosynthesis,photorespiration and respiration[J]. New Phytologist, 2019, 221:32-49.
[9] SLOT M, WINTER K. In situ temperature relationships of biochemical and stomatal controls of photosynthesis in four lowland tropical tree species[J]. Plant Cell and Environment, 2017, 40:3055-3068.
[10] COSTANZA R, GROOT R, SUTTON P, et al. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2014, 26:152-158.
[11] DI Sabatino A, COSCIEME L, VIGNINI P, et al. Scale and ecological dependence of ecosystem services evaluation:Spatial extension and economic value of freshwater ecosystems in Italy[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2013, 32:259-263.
[12] BENNETT EM, PETERSON GD, GORDON L J, et al. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services:Relationships among multiple ecosystem services[J]. Ecology Letters, 2009, 12:1394-1404.
[13] HAASE D., SCHWARZ N., STROHBACH M., et al. Synergies,trade-offs,and losses of ecosystem services in urban regions:an integrated multiscale framework applied to the Leipzig-Halle Region,Germany[J]. Ecology and Society, 2012(3):17.
[14] 杨海江, 勾晓华, 唐呈瑞, 等. 2010—2021年中国森林生态系统服务功能价值评估研究进展[J]. 生态学杂志, 43(1):244-253.
[15] 李新, 勾晓华, 王宁练, 等. 祁连山国家级自然保护区绿色发展:从生态治理到生态恢复[J]. 科学通报, 2019, 64(27):2928-2937.
[16] WANG Xiqiang, CHEN Rensheng, HAN Chuntan, et al. Response of frozen ground under climate change in the Qilian Mountains,China[J]. Quaternary International, 2019, 523:10-15.
[17] ZANG Fei, WANG Hong, ZHAO Chuanyan, et al. Atmospheric wet deposition of trace elements to forest ecosystem of the Qilian Mountains,northwest China[J]. Catena, 2021, 197:104966.
[18] 丁文广, 勾晓华, 李育. 祁连山国家级自然保护区生态绿皮书[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社. 2018.
[19] 张彩南, 张颖. 青海省祁连山国家级自然保护区国家公园生态系统服务价值评估研究[J]. 环境保护, 2019, 47(Z1):41-47.
[20] 蔡蔚, 刘学录, 宋洁, 等. 基于土地利用变化的生态系统服务价值动态研究:以祁连山国家级自然保护区为例[J]. 国土与自然资源研究, 2020(4):32-37.
[21] 钱大文, 曹广民, 杜岩功, 等. 2000—2015年祁连山国家级自然保护区南坡生态系统服务价值时空变化[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(4):1392-1404.
[22] 欧阳志云, 朱春全, 杨广斌, 等. 生态系统生产总值核算:概念、核算方法与案例研究[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(21):6747-6761.
[23] 生态环境部. 全国生态状况调查评估技术规范—生态系统服务功能评估:HJ 1173—2021[S]. 北京: 生态环境部, 2021.
[24] 国家林业和草原局. 森林生态系统服务功能评估规范:GB/T 38582—2020[S]. 北京: 国家市场监督管理总局、国家标准化管理委员会, 2020.
[25] 汪有奎, 郭生祥, 汪杰, 等. 甘肃祁连山国家级自然保护区森林生态系统服务价值评估[J]. 中国沙漠, 2013, 33(6):1905-1911.
[26] 王莉雁, 肖燚, 欧阳志云, 等. 国家级重点生态功能区县生态系统生产总值核算研究:以阿尔山市为例[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2017, 27(3):146-154.
文章导航

/