欢迎访问林草资源研究
技术应用

鹦哥岭野茶群落物种组成与竞争关系研究

  • 朱子丞 ,
  • 戚春林 ,
  • 杨小波 ,
  • 李东海 ,
  • 苏凡
展开
  • 1.海南大学 生态与环境学院,海口 570228
    2.兴隆热带植物园,海南 万宁 571500
朱子丞,硕士,主要研究方向:植物生态学与森林生态学。Email:zzc15802018340@163.com

收稿日期: 2023-09-26

  修回日期: 2023-11-30

  网络出版日期: 2024-02-21

基金资助

海南省自然科学基金“海南大叶茶优异种质资源鉴定评价与遗传多样性研究”(323QN274);中华环境保护基金会“海南野生茶种质资源保护项目”(HO-KYH-2022236)

Study on Species Composition and Competition Relationship of Camellia sinensis var.assamica Community in Yinggeling

  • Zicheng ZHU ,
  • Chunlin QI ,
  • Xiaobo YANG ,
  • Donghai LI ,
  • Fan SU
Expand
  • 1. School of Ecology and Environment,Hainan University,Haikou 570228,China
    2. Xinglong Tropical Botanical Garden,Wanning,Hainan 571500,China

Received date: 2023-09-26

  Revised date: 2023-11-30

  Online published: 2024-02-21

摘要

为探明鹦哥岭野茶的生态地位及其种间关系,为后续野茶种群的保护与利用提供参考,采用样方法和样圆法对鹦哥岭野茶群落进行物种组成及竞争关系研究。结果表明:1)研究中共记录到395种植物(含5变种1变型),隶属于102科217属。其中,茜草科、樟科、壳斗科等为优势科,榕属、粗叶木属、蒲桃属等为优势属,野茶、鹅掌柴、九节、黄杞、尾叶柯等为群落中的优势种。2)野茶在群落中的竞争主要来源于种间,占比达90.02%,各物种对野茶的竞争强度排序为野茶>黄杞>鹅掌柴>尾叶柯>水锦>黄牛木。3)总竞争强度随野茶胸径增加逐渐下降,幼树和中树阶段存在显著差异,大树阶段无显著差异。I、II、III阶段竞争强度占总竞争强度的96.10%,说明野茶在较小胸径时受到的竞争压力较大,在大树阶段受到的竞争较小。4)野茶胸径与竞争强度呈极显著负相关关系。因此,在野茶的保护中应加强小胸径茶树的保护,使其平稳向大胸径茶树过渡,同时增强对于幼小茶苗的抚育及茶果的管控,促进野茶种群更新。

本文引用格式

朱子丞 , 戚春林 , 杨小波 , 李东海 , 苏凡 . 鹦哥岭野茶群落物种组成与竞争关系研究[J]. 林草资源研究, 2023 , 0(6) : 129 -136 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lczyyj.2023.06.016

Abstract

In order to explore the ecological status and interspecific relationship of Camellia sinensis var.assamica,and to provide reference for the subsequent conservation and utilization of Camellia sinensis var.assamica populations,species composition and competition relationship in the Camellia sinensis var.assamica community were studied by sample method and circle method.The results were:1)A total of 395 plant species (including 5 varieties and 1 variant)were recorded in the study,belonging to 217 genera in 102 families.Among them,Rubiaceae,Lauraceae,Fagaceae,etc.are the dominant families,Ficus,Lasianthus,Syzygium,etc.are the dominant genus,and Camellia sinensis var.assamica,Heptapleurum heptaphyllum,Psychotria asiatica,Engelhardia roxburghiana,and Lithocarpus caudatilimbus are the dominant species in the community.2)The competition of Camellia sinensis var.assamica in the community mainly came from interspecies,accounting for 90.02%,and the competition intensity of each species for Camellia sinensis var.assamica was ranked as follows:Camellia sinensis var.assamica>Engelhardia roxburghiana>Heptapleurum heptaphyllum>Lithocarpus caudatilimbus>Wendlandia uvariifolia>Cratoxylum cochinchinense.3)The competition intensity gradually decreased with the increase of the diameter at breast height of Camellia sinensis var.assamica,and there were significant differences between the small tree and the middle tree stage,but there was no significant difference after the large tree stage.The competition intensity of the I,II and III stages accounted for 96.10% of the total competition intensity,indicating that Camellia sinensis var.assamica was under greater competitive pressure at small diameter at breast height and less competition at old tree stage.4)There was a significant negative correlation between the diameter at breast height of Camellia sinensis var.assamica and the competitive intensity.So,in the protection of Camellia sinensis var.assamica,the protection of individuals with small diameter at breast height should be strengthened,so that the transition to large diameter at breast height can be smoothly made,and the cultivation of small tea seedlings and the control of tea fruits should be strengthened to promote their population renewal.

参考文献

[1] 方庆, 谭菊荣, 许惠春, 等. 珍稀濒危植物细果秤锤树群落物种组成与生态位分析[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2022, 39(5):931-939.
[2] 李博, 陈家宽,A.R. 沃金森. 植物竞争研究进展[J]. 植物学通报, 1998(4):20-31.
[3] 毛磊, 杨丹青, 王冬梅, 等. 红花尔基自然保护区天然樟子松林种内种间竞争分析[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2008(2):9-14.
[4] 高浩杰, 高平仕, 王国明. 舟山群岛红楠林种内和种间竞争研究[J]. 植物研究, 2017, 37(3):440-446.
[5] Maleki K, Kiviste A, Korjus H. Analysis of individual tree competition effect on diameter growth of silver birch in Estonia[J]. Forest Systems, 2015, 24(2):e023.
[6] 孙哲明, 刘亚恒, 彭秋桐, 等. 湖北省极小种群野生植物在原生群落中的竞争地位及保护建议[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(6):76-83.
[7] 于达勇, 樊智丰, 马长乐, 等. 云南榧树群落种内与种间竞争研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2022, 37(1):47-52.
[8] 许恒, 刘艳红. 珍稀濒危植物梓叶槭种群径级结构与种内种间竞争关系[J]. 西北植物学报, 2018, 38(6):1160-1170.
[9] 刘虹佑, 马燕, 吴其超, 等. 濒危植物泰山柳种内与种间的竞争关系[J]. 森林与环境学报, 2020, 40(2):178-183.
[10] 林建勇, 李娟, 梁瑞龙. 灌木层的叉叶苏铁种内和种间竞争[J]. 森林与环境学报, 2019, 39(2):159-164.
[11] 陈焕镛. 海南植物志[M]. 北京: 科学出版社,1964.
[12] 郭远安. 海南岛野生茶树的调查[J]. 广东农业科学, 1991(2):45.
[13] 李苑菱, 张丽, 杨小波, 等. 海南岛野生茶树空间分布及种群动态研究[J]. 林业资源管理, 2017(2):83-89.
[14] 苏凡, 杨小波, 李东海. 基于形态学特征和psbA-trnH叶绿体编码基因序列明确五指山野生茶的分类地位[J]. 热带作物学报, 2019, 40(8):1565-1570.
[15] 杨文凤, 黄川腾, 陈飞飞, 等. 海南岛鹦哥岭伯乐树种群及其生境特征[J]. 园艺与种苗, 2023, 43(2):23-26.
[16] 吴海霞, 杜尚嘉, 陈国德, 等. 鹦哥岭自然保护区药用植物资源种群空间分布特征分析[J]. 西南农业学报, 2019, 32(5):981-986.
[17] 孙哲明, 刘亚恒, 彭秋桐, 等. 湖北省极小种群野生植物在原生群落中的竞争地位及保护建议[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(6):76-83.
[18] 王晓霞, 张钦弟, 毕润成, 等. 山西稀有濒危植物脱皮榆种内和种间竞争[J]. 生态学杂志, 2013, 32(7):1756-1761.
[19] 蒋国梅, 孙国, 张光富, 等. 濒危植物宝华玉兰种内与种间竞争[J]. 生态学杂志, 2010, 29(2):201-206.
[20] 廖南燕, 蔡中伦, 李武峥, 等. 广西防城金花茶国家级自然保护区肉实树种内种间竞争关系研究[J]. 广西林业科学, 2023, 52(3):344-349.
[21] 刘万生, 李想, 陈福元, 等. 蒙古栎林种内和种间竞争研究[J]. 植物研究, 2020, 40(4):552-558.
[22] 李帅锋, 刘万德, 苏建荣, 等. 滇西北金沙江流域云南红豆杉群落种内与种间竞争[J]. 生态学杂志, 2013, 32(1):33-38.
[23] 张忠华, 胡刚, 秦川, 等. 青秀山风景区优势种大叶栎种内与种间的竞争关系[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2016, 36(1):67-71.
文章导航

/