欢迎访问林草资源研究
科学研究

引入林分优势高和气候因子的杉木和桉树树高-胸径模型研建

  • 杜志 ,
  • 陈振雄 ,
  • 李锐 ,
  • 罗崇彬 ,
  • 杨国锦 ,
  • 曾伟生
展开
  • 1.国家林业和草原局中南调查规划院,长沙 410014
    2.四会市自然保护地管理中心,广东 肇庆 526000
    3.国家林业和草原局林草调查规划院,北京 100714
杜志(1986-),男,湖南长沙人,高级工程师,硕士,主要研究方向:森林资源监测与评价。Email:674862391@qq.com

收稿日期: 2023-05-08

  修回日期: 2023-05-25

  网络出版日期: 2023-10-16

基金资助

国家自然科学基金面上项目(31971578)

Development of Tree Height-DBH Model for Cunninghamia lanceolata and Eucalyptus Robusta Based on Stand Dominant Height and Climatic Factors

  • Zhi DU ,
  • Zhenxiong CHEN ,
  • Rui Li ,
  • Chongbin LUO ,
  • Guojin YANG ,
  • Weisheng ZENG
Expand
  • 1. Central South Academy of Inventory and Planning of NFGA,Changsha 410014,China
    2. Sihui Nature Reserve Management Center,Zhaoqing,Guangdong 526000,China
    3. Academy of Forest Inventory and Planning,National Forestry and Grassland Administration,Beijing 100714,China

Received date: 2023-05-08

  Revised date: 2023-05-25

  Online published: 2023-10-16

摘要

基于广西森林资源年度监测评价项目中25块杉木样地和25块桉树样地的每木胸径和树高实测数据,从7个传统树高-胸径曲线中筛选出拟合精度最优模型作为基础模型,引入林分优势高和气候因子构建广义非线性模型,通过10折交叉验证法进行检验,并对一元材积公式的估计误差进行评价。结果显示:1)各传统树高-胸径曲线模型中,Richards模型为杉木和桉树最优的基础模型;2)引入了林分优势高和气候因子的杉木和桉树树高-胸径广义非线性模型,拟合精度相对基础模型更高,杉木的R2,MPEMPSE的值分别为0.797 6,0.58%和13.91%,桉树的R2,MPEMPSE值分别为0.720 7,0.62%和11.58%;3)采用一元材积公式得到的杉木和桉树总体蓄积与实测蓄积相差较大,其中桉树相对误差为-13.51%,超过了林业行业标准要求范围,运用树高-胸径广义非线性模型和二元材积公式计算总体蓄积,与实测值相对误差不超过0.5%,构建的杉木和桉树树高-胸径广义非线性模型能运用于实践生产。

本文引用格式

杜志 , 陈振雄 , 李锐 , 罗崇彬 , 杨国锦 , 曾伟生 . 引入林分优势高和气候因子的杉木和桉树树高-胸径模型研建[J]. 林草资源研究, 2023 , 0(4) : 36 -42 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2023.04.005

Abstract

Based on the mensuration data of diameter at breast height(DBH)and tree height from 25 Plots of Cunninghamia lanceolata and 25 plots of Eucalyptus robusta in the annual monitoring and evaluation of national forest resources of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region,the basic model with the highest simulation accuracy was selected from seven common tree height-DBH curve models,then stand dominant height and climate data were introduced to build generalized nonlinear models.The 10-fold cross-validation method was applied to test the models,and the estimation error of one-dimensional volume formula was evaluated.The results showed that:1)Among the traditional tree height-DBH curve models,Chapman-Richards model was the basic model with the highest accuracy;2)Compared with the basic model,the generalized nonlinear tree height-DBH model with stand dominant height and climate data had higher fitting accuracy.The determination coefficient(R2),mean prediction errors(MPE)and mean percent standard errors(MPSE)of Cunninghamia lanceolata model were 0.7976,0.58% and 13.91%,respectively,and those of Eucalyptus robusta model were 0.7207,0.62% and 11.58%,respectively;3)The volume calculated by the one-dimensional volume formula was quite different from the measured volume,especially the Eucalyptus robusta reach -13.51%,which exceeded the scope of forestry industry standards.It was worth noting that the relative error calculated by the binary volume formula and the generalized nonlinear tree height-DBH model is not above 0.5%.The generalized nonlinear tree height-DBH model of Cunninghamia lanceolata and Eucalyptus robusta can be well applied to practical production.

参考文献

[1] 郭嘉, 孙帅超, 田相林, 等. 引入优势木树高建立的秦岭林区松栎林树高-胸径模型[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2019, 47(11):66-72.
[2] 曾伟生. 国家森林资源连续清查中的材积估计问题探讨[J]. 中南林业调查规划, 2007, 26(2):1-6.
[3] 蒲莹, 曾伟生, 阳帆. 北京市树高胸径回归模型研建及一元立木材积表检验[J]. 林业资源管理, 2021(3):62-66.
[4] 李春明, 李利学. 基于非线性混合模型的栓皮栎树高与胸径关系研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2009, 31(4):7-12.
[5] 曾伟生. 总体与林分水平的树高-胸径模型对蓄积量估计的影响分析[J]. 林业资源管理, 2019(6):38-41.
[6] Sharma M, Parton J. Height-diameter equations for boreal tree species in Ontario using a mixed-effects modeling approach[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2007, 249(3):187-198.
[7] Yang Yuqing, Huang Shongming. Effects of competition and climate variables on modelling height to live crown for three boreal tree species in Alberta,Canada[J]. European Journal of Forest Research, 2018, 137(2):153-167.
[8] Fortin M, Couwenberghe V C, Perez V, et al. Evidence of climate effects on the height-diameter relationships of tree species[J/OL]. Annals of Forest Science, 2019, 76(1):1[2023-04-19]. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13595-018-0784-9.
[9] GB/T 38590—2020,森林资源连续清查技术规程[S].
[10] Wang Tongli, Hamann A, Spittlehouse D L, et al. Climatewna-high-resolution spatial climate data for western north America[J]. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 2012, 51(1):16-29.
[11] 曾伟生, 唐守正. 立木生物量模型的优度评价和精度分析[J]. 林业科学, 2011, 47(11):106-113.
[12] 曾伟生, 杨学云, 陈新云. 北京市主要树种单木和林分生长率模型研建[J]. 中南林业调查规划, 2022, 41(1):1-8.
Options
文章导航

/