欢迎访问林草资源研究
研究简报

基于层次分析法的浙江省古树名木资源综合价值评估研究

  • 谭莹 ,
  • 徐军 ,
  • 林聪聪 ,
  • 王柯 ,
  • 王文武 ,
  • 陈春雷
展开
  • 浙江省森林资源监测中心,杭州 310020
谭 莹(1983-),浙江湖州人,高级工程师,硕士,主要从事林业信息化建设及古树名木资源调查研究等工作。Email:1109741257@qq.com

收稿日期: 2023-04-11

  修回日期: 2023-05-18

  网络出版日期: 2023-10-16

Study on the Comprehensive Value Evaluation of Ancient and Famous Tree Resources in Zhejiang Province Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process

  • Ying TAN ,
  • Jun XU ,
  • Congcong LIN ,
  • Ke WANG ,
  • Wenwu WANG ,
  • Chunlei CHEN
Expand
  • Center for Forest Resource Monitoring of Zhejiang Province,Hangzhou 310020,China

Received date: 2023-04-11

  Revised date: 2023-05-18

  Online published: 2023-10-16

摘要

在浙江省古树名木资源普查的基础上,采用层次分析法,考虑生态经济、景观美学、社会文化、科学研究四大因素,构建古树名木价值评估体系,并按评估指标赋分标准对古树评分,参考市场价值,对全省古树名木资源综合价值进行定量评估,进而分析其总体分布情况和市域空间分布特征。研究结果表明:浙江省古树名木的综合价值为7 246.05亿元,其中,生态经济价值为787.10亿元,景观美学价值为3 548.68亿元,社会文化价值为1 091.18亿元,科学研究价值为1 819.09亿元,四者之比为1∶4.51∶1.39∶2.31。浙江省古树名木综合价值市域分布总体不均衡,呈西南向东北递减的分布格局,两个高价值聚集区为绍兴会稽山脉区域及丽水国家公园区域,东部平原及沿海地区为价值洼地。通过不同区域之间的横纵向比较,可以从价值的视角,揭示古树名木资源分布的特点,可为浙江省各级政府部门科学制定古树名木资源保护发展战略规划及科学决策古树名木保护资金投入提供客观依据和对策建议。

本文引用格式

谭莹 , 徐军 , 林聪聪 , 王柯 , 王文武 , 陈春雷 . 基于层次分析法的浙江省古树名木资源综合价值评估研究[J]. 林草资源研究, 2023 , 0(4) : 169 -178 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2023.04.020

Abstract

Based on the survey of ancient and famous tree resources in Zhejiang Province,the analytic hierarchy process(AHP)was used to construct the value evaluation system of ancient and famous trees considering the factors of ecological economy,landscape aesthetics,social culture and scientific research.The ancient trees were scored according to the evaluation index scoring standard,and the comprehensive value of ancient and famous tree resources in the province was quantitatively evaluated with reference to the market value,and then the overall distribution and urban spatial characteristics were analyzed.The results show that :The comprehensive value of ancient and famous trees in Zhejiang Province is 724.605 billion yuan,the ecological economic value is 78.710 billion yuan,the landscape aesthetic value is 354.868 billion yuan,the social and cultural value is 109.118 billion yuan,and the scientific study value is 181.909 billion yuan.The ratio of the four is 1∶4.51∶1.39∶2.31.The comprehensive value distribution of ancient and famous trees in Zhejiang Province is generally uneven,showing a decreasing distribution pattern from southwest to northeast.The two high-value gathering areas are Shaoxing Kuaiji Mountain Area and Lishui National Park Area,and the eastern plain and coastal areas are value depressions.Through the horizontal and vertical comparison between different regions,the characteristics of the distribution of ancient and famous tree resources can be revealed from the perspective of value,which can provide an objective basis and countermeasures for the government departments at all levels in Zhejiang Province to scientifically formulate the strategic planning for the protection and development of ancient and famous tree resources and scientific decision-making on the investment of ancient and famous tree protection funds.

参考文献

[1] 王继程. 古树名木综合价值评价研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2011.
[2] Blicharska M, Mikusiński G. Incorporating social and cultural significance of large old trees in conservation policy[J]. Conservation Biology:The Journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2014, 28(6):1558-1567.
[3] Ulrika R, Eva V, Annegreth D S. A battle of values:A case study of a blacklisted heritage tree represented by European silver fir Abies alba Mill.in a protected landscape in Norway[J]. Arboricultural Journal, 2018, 40(2):92-105.
[4] Nir B, Shirra F. The economic value of old growth trees in Israel[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 2009, 11(8):608-615.
[5] 王碧云, 兰思仁. 古树名木价值评价研究综述[J]. 林业建设, 2016,(3):42-47.
[6] 王碧云, 修新田, 兰思仁. 古树名木文化价值货币化评估研究[J]. 林业经济问题, 2016, 36(6):565-570.
[7] 陈赛赛, 李祉宣, 张明娟. 国内外古树研究进展[J]. 中国城市林业, 2022, 20(3):147-152.
[8] 赵卫国. 北京市古树名木保护现状与价值估算[J]. 南方农业, 2022, 16(20):68-70.
[9] 米锋, 李吉跃, 张大红, 等. 北京地区林木损失额的价值计量研究——有关古树名木科学文化价值损失额计量方法的探讨[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2006(S2):141-148.
[10] 孙超, 车生泉. 古树名木景观价值评价——程式专家法研究[J]. 上海交通大学学报:农业科学版, 2010, 28(3):209-217.
[11] 林思平. 古树名木资产评估研究[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2017.
[12] 雷硕, 马奔, 温亚利. 北京市民对古树名木保护支付意愿及影响因素研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2017, 31(4):73-79.
[13] 徐炜. 古树名木价值评估标准的探讨[J]. 华南热带农业大学学报, 2005(1):66-69.
[14] 熊璐瑶. 江西省古树名木资源价值评价[J]. 南方林业科学, 2021, 49(5):69-73.
[15] 杨娱, 田明华, 秦国伟, 等. 城市古树名木综合价值货币化评估研究——以北京市古树“遮荫侯”为例[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2019, 33(6):185-191.
[16] 董冬, 何云核, 周志翔. 基于AHP和FSE的九华山风景区古树名木景观价值评价[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19(9):1003-1009.
[17] 贾永生, 乌志颜, 于海蛟, 等. 基于AHP的赤峰市古树名木综合价值评价[J]. 内蒙古林业科技, 2014, 40(1):43-46.
[18] 黄士良, 金红霞, 冯广平, 等. 冀南地区古树名木时空分布及文化价值研究[J]. 河北师范大学学报:自然科学版, 2017, 41(2):160-168.
[19] 黄晓君, 王东秀, 袁金满, 等. 乡村振兴战略背景下古树名木资源文化挖掘与旅游开发——以广东省肇庆市鼎湖区蕉园村为例[J]. 林业与环境科学, 2020, 36(1):99-108.
[20] 王东秀, 车瑞, 朱宇钒, 等. 广东省古树名木保护和开发利用——以绿美古树乡村建设为例[J]. 林业与环境科学, 2021, 37(6):163-168.
文章导航

/