欢迎访问林草资源研究
技术应用

基于Sentinel-2B的油松冠层可燃物含水率反演研究

  • 刘鸿升 ,
  • 欧阳文欣 ,
  • 魏英杰 ,
  • 谢亦秋 ,
  • 李建军
展开
  • 1.湖南省林业事务中心,长沙 410004
    2.中南林业科技大学 计算机与信息工程学院,长沙 410004
    3.中国林业科学研究院资源信息研究所,北京 100091
刘鸿升(1987-),男,湖南新化人,本科,主要研究方向:林业科技信息化。Email:992668965@qq.com

收稿日期: 2023-06-29

  修回日期: 2023-07-17

  网络出版日期: 2023-10-16

基金资助

国家重点研发计划课题“森林立地质量评价和全周期多功能经营决策平台”(2022YFD2200505)

Research on Inversion of Combustible Moisture Content in the Pinus Tabulaeformis Canopy Based on Sentinel-2B

  • Hongsheng LIU ,
  • Wenxin OUYANG ,
  • Yingjie WEI ,
  • Yiqiu XIE ,
  • Jianjun LI
Expand
  • 1. Hunan Provincial Forestry Affairs Center,Changsha 410004,China
    2. College of Computer and Information Engineering,Central South University of Forestry and Technology,Changsha 410004,China
    3. Institute of Forest Resource Information Techniques,Chinese Academy of Forestry,Beijing 100091,China

Received date: 2023-06-29

  Revised date: 2023-07-17

  Online published: 2023-10-16

摘要

森林火灾的发生与植被冠层可燃物含水率的大小有着密切联系。利用高精度、大尺度、高效率的遥感影像反演获取植被冠层可燃物含水率对于有效防治森林火灾具有重要意义。油松由于其自身理化性质成为引发森林火灾的主要树种之一,以张家口崇礼区的油松为研究对象,基于Sentinel-2B遥感影像和油松含水率实测数据,建立了多个油松冠层可燃物含水率反演模型:一元线性回归模型、一元非线性回归模型和多元非线性回归模型,并利用决定系数(R2)和均方根误差(RMSE)进行模型精度评价。结果表明,非线性模型总体上要优于线性模型;通过多个自变量因子建立的多元非线性模型能够更好地反映油松冠层可燃物含水率情况,模型反演精度更高,可以为植被冠层可燃物含水率反演模型方法选择提供一定的理论依据。

本文引用格式

刘鸿升 , 欧阳文欣 , 魏英杰 , 谢亦秋 , 李建军 . 基于Sentinel-2B的油松冠层可燃物含水率反演研究[J]. 林草资源研究, 2023 , 0(4) : 141 -149 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2023.04.017

Abstract

The occurrence of forest fires is closely related to the moisture content of vegetation canopy combustibles.Using high-precision,large-scale,and high-efficiency remote sensing image inversion to obtain the moisture content of vegetation canopy combustibles is of great significance for effective prevention and control of forest fires.Pinus tabulaeformis is one of the main tree species causing forest fires due to its physical and chemical properties.This study takes Pinus tabulaeformis in Chongli District,Zhangjiakou as the research object.Based on Sentinel 2B remote sensing images and measured moisture content dataof Pinus tabulaeformis,multiple linear regression models,nonlinear regression models and multiple nonlinear regression models were established for the moisture content of Pinus tabulaeformis canopy combustibles.Using the coefficient of determination(R2)and root mean square error(RMSE)to evaluate model accuracy.The results indicated that the nonlinear model was generally superior to the linear model;The multivariate nonlinear model established through multiple independent variable factors better reflected the moisture content of Pinus tabulaeformis canopy combustibles,and the model had higher inversion accuracy,which provided a certain theoretical basis for the selection of vegetation canopy fuel moisture inversion model methods.

参考文献

[1] Sandra D, Hector A, Wardle D A. Biodiversity in forest carbon sequestration initiatives:Not just a side benefit[J]. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2009, 1(1):55-60.
[2] Yang Xiguang, Yu Ying, Hu Haiqing, et al. Moisture content estimation of forest litter based on remote sensing data[J]. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2018, 190:1-10.
[3] Wu Chao, Venevsky S, Sitch S, et al. Present-day and future contribution of climate and fires to vegetation composition in the boreal forest of China[J]. Ecosphere, 2017, 8(8):e01917.
[4] Mohajane M, Costache R, Karimi F, et al. Application of remote sensing and machine learning algorithms for forest fire mapping in a Mediterranean area[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2021, 129:107869.
[5] Moritz M A, Batllori E, Bradstock R A, et al. Learning to coexist with wildfire[J]. Nature, 2014, 515:58-66.
[6] 王秋华. 森林火灾燃烧过程中的火行为研究[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2010.
[7] Loehman R A, Reinhardt E, Riley K L. Wildland fire emissions,carbon,and climate:Seeing the forest and the trees-A cross-scale assessment of wildfire and carbon dynamics in fire-prone,forested ecosystems[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2014, 317:9-19.
[8] 全兴文, 何彬彬, 刘向茁, 等. 多模型耦合下的植被冠层可燃物含水率遥感反演[J]. 遥感学报, 2019, 23(1):62-77.
[9] 张志, 许文浩. 澳大利亚 2019—2020 森林火灾对我国应急管理体系建设的启示[J]. 中国应急救援, 2020(2):18-22.
[10] 赵月. 基于无人机的林火监测系统设计与实现[D]. 济南: 山东大学, 2019.
[11] 刘昕, 邸雪颖. 三种方法对森林地表可燃物含水率的预测评价[J]. 森林工程, 2013, 29(2):8-13.
[12] 孙龙, 刘祺, 胡同欣. 森林地表死可燃物含水率预测模型研究进展[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(4):142-152.
[13] 李海洋, 胡海清, 孙龙. 我国森林死可燃物含水率与气象和土壤因子关系模型研究[J]. 森林工程, 2016, 32(3):1-6.
[14] Gao Bocai. NDWI—A normalized difference water index for remote sensing of vegetation liquid water from space[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1996, 58(3):257-266.
[15] Ceccato P, Gobron N, Flasse S, et al. Designing a spectral index to estimate vegetation water content from remote sensing data:Part 1 theoretical approach[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2002, 82(2-3):188-197.
[16] 王长青. 结合Sentinel-1B和Landsat8 OLI数据的针叶林冠层叶片含水量反演研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2018.
[17] 刘曦, 金森. 平衡含水率法预测死可燃物含水率的研究进展[J]. 林业科学, 2007(12):126-133.
[18] 张恒, 刘鑫源, 李星汉, 等. 我国气象要素回归法预测地表可燃物含水率研究进展[J]. 森林防火, 2018(3):25-31.
[19] Luo Ke, Wei Yufeng, Du Jie, et al. Machine learning-based estimates of aboveground biomass of subalpine forests using Landsat 8 OLI and Sentinel-2B images in the Jiuzhaigou National Nature Reserve,Eastern Tibet Plateau[J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 2022, 33(4):1329-1340.
[20] 冯舒芮, 成莉莉, 张珊珊, 等. 崇礼区森林植被和乔木生长的空间变化[J]. 中央民族大学学报:自然科学版, 2023, 32(2):5-9.
[21] 郜鹏, 赵海明, 解旭东, 等. 崇礼冬奥风景廊道生态修复数字监测体系构建[J]. 现代园艺, 2023, 46(8):151-153.
[22] 李贾, 兰岚, 张佐忠, 等. 基于深度学习的森林可燃物含水率反演技术[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(10):47-58.
[23] Maffei C, Leone A P, Vella M, et al. Retrieval of vegetation moisture indicators for dynamic fire risk assessment with simulated MODIS radiance[C]. 2007 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium,Barcelona,Spain, 2007:4648-4651.
[24] 张峰, 周广胜. 植被含水量高光谱遥感监测研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2018, 42(5):517-525.
[25] 陈宗杰, 杨武年, 张琬琳, 等. 基于植被冠层含水量反演数据的森林易燃程度评价[J]. 测绘通报, 2023, 553(4):99-105.
[26] Arga?araz J P, Landi M A, Bravo S J, et al. Estimation of live fuel moisture content from MODIS images for fire danger assessment in southern Gran Chaco[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2016, 9(12):5339-5349.
[27] Yebra M, Chuvieco E, Ria?o D. Estimation of live fuel moisture content from MODIS images for fire risk assessment[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2008, 148(4):523-536.
文章导航

/