欢迎访问林草资源研究
生态论坛

湖北神农架生态保护优先区识别及空缺分析

  • 张平 ,
  • 晁碧霄 ,
  • 肖杨萍 ,
  • 王丽 ,
  • 卢渊 ,
  • 徐健楠 ,
  • 邹尚伯 ,
  • 邹全程
展开
  • 1.国家林业和草原局重点国有林区森林资源监测中心,黑龙江 加格达奇 165000
    2.国家林业和草原局林草调查规划院,北京 100714
    3.神农架国家公园管理局,湖北 神农架 442400
    4.新疆维吾尔自治区天然林保护中心,乌鲁木齐 830000
    5.国家林业和草原局森林草原火灾预防监测中心,北京 100714
    6.黑龙江省东宁市林业和草原局,黑龙江 东宁 157299
张平(1969-),男,甘肃平凉人,工程师,主要研究方向:林草资源调查监测评估及工程咨询设计。Email: yp650@qq.com

收稿日期: 2023-04-11

  修回日期: 2023-04-25

  网络出版日期: 2023-08-09

Identification and Gap Analysis of Priority Areas for Ecological Protection in Shennongjia of Hubei Province

  • Ping ZHANG ,
  • Bixiao CHAO ,
  • Yangping XIAO ,
  • Li WANG ,
  • Yuan LU ,
  • Jiannan XU ,
  • Shangbo ZOU ,
  • Quancheng ZOU
Expand
  • 1. Key Forest Resources Monitoring Centre in National Forest Areas,National Forestry and Grassland Administration,Jiagedaqi,Heilongjiang 165002,China
    2. Academy of Forestry Inventory and Planning,National Forestry and Grassland Administration,Beijing 100714,China
    3. Shennongjia National Park Administration,Shennongjia,Hubei 442400,China
    4. Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Natural Forest Protection Center,Urumqi 830000,China
    5. Forest and Grassland Fire Prevention and Monitoring Center,National Forestry and Grassland Administration,Beijing 100714,China
    6. Forestry and Grassland Bureau of Dongning City,Dongning,Heilongjiang 157299,China

Received date: 2023-04-11

  Revised date: 2023-04-25

  Online published: 2023-08-09

摘要

湖北神农架生物多样性丰富、保护价值高,在全球范围内具有极强的不可替代性。为更精准地保护神农架的重要生态资源,提高保护效率,通过构建湖北神农架生态保护优先区识别模型,识别区域保护优先区并进行保护空缺分析。结果表明:湖北神农架的生态价值总体较高,生态保护重要性空间分布格局以“省道318—国道242—省道318”为分界线,北部生态保护重要性显著弱于南部;神农架生态保护优先区主要位于自然度高、人为干扰较低的区域,包括太阳坪、猴子垭、神农顶等。生态保护优先区已基本纳入自然保护地及自然保护小区管理范围,但在竹溪县柳树坪、房县红岩寨、神农架林区黑沙屿、兴山县黄祁垭和太皇山仍存在部分保护空缺。建议依托国家公园体制试点区设立神农架国家公园,进一步整合优化区域内的自然保护地,在保证高生态价值区域纳入保护范围的基础上,提高整体保护效果。

本文引用格式

张平 , 晁碧霄 , 肖杨萍 , 王丽 , 卢渊 , 徐健楠 , 邹尚伯 , 邹全程 . 湖北神农架生态保护优先区识别及空缺分析[J]. 林草资源研究, 2023 , 0(3) : 15 -20 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2023.03.003

Abstract

Shennongjia of Hubei Province is rich in biodiversity and has high conservation value,which is highly irreplaceable worldwide.In order to more accurately protect important ecological resources in Shennongjia and improve protection efficiency,this study built an ecological protection priority area identification model for Shennongjia of Hubei Province,and conducted protection priority area identification and protection gap analysis for its regions.The results showed that the overall ecological value of Shennongjia in Hubei Province was relatively high,and the spatial distribution pattern of ecological protection importance was divided by provincial highway "318 - national highway 242 - provincial highway 318".The ecological protection importance in the north was significantly weaker than that in the south;The priority area for ecological protection in Shennongjia was mainly located in areas with high degree of naturalness and low human interference,including Taiyangping,Houziya,Shennongding,and other areas.However,there were still gaps in the protection of Liushuping in Zhuxi County,Hongyanzhai in Fangxian County,Heishayu in Shennongjia forest region,Huangqiya in Xingshan County,and Taihuang Mountain.The priority areas for ecological protection had basically been included in the management scope of natural protected areas and nature reserves,but there were still some gaps in protection.It is suggested that the opportunity of establishing Shennongjia National Park can be used to further integrate and optimize the regional nature reserve system,and improve protection efficiency on the basis of ensuring that areas with high ecological value are included in the protection scope.

参考文献

[1] Chapin F, Zavaleta E, Eviner V, et al. Consequences of changing biodiversity[J]. Nature, 2000, 405:234-242.
[2] Costanza R, D'Arge R, De Groot R, et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Ecological Economics, 1998, 25(1):3-15.
[3] Arneth A, Shin Y J, Leadley P, et al. Post—2020 biodiversity targets need to embrace climate change[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2020, 117(49):30882-30891.
[4] Myers N. Threatened biota:"Hotspots" in tropical forests[J]. Environmentalist, 1988, 8(3):187-208.
[5] Canadas E, Fenu G, Penas J, et al. Hotspots within hotspots:Endemic plant richness,environmental drivers,and implications for conservation[J]. Biological Conservation, 2014, 170:282-291.
[6] 肖能文, 赵志平, 李果, 等. 中国生物多样性保护优先区域生物多样性调查和评估方法[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(7):2523-2531.
[7] 邢韶华, 周鑫, 刘云强, 等. 京津冀地区物种多样性保护优先区识别研究[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(8):3144-3152.
[8] 马琪, 张园, 袁家根. 秦岭生物多样性优先区植物保护重要区识别与空缺分析[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2022, 37(2):180-185.
[9] 栾晓峰, 黄维妮, 王秀磊, 等. 基于系统保护规划方法东北生物多样性热点地区和保护空缺分析[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(1):144-150.
[10] 谢宗强, 申国珍, 周友兵, 等. 神农架世界自然遗产地的全球突出普遍价值及其保护[J]. 生物多样性, 2017, 25(5):490-497.
[11] 马明哲, 申国珍, 熊高明, 等. 神农架自然遗产地植被垂直带谱的特点和代表性[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(11):1127-1139.
[12] 李艳辉, 兰天元, 王月, 等. 神农架植物物种空间周转的驱动因素[J]. 生物多样性, 2022, 30(4):27-35.
[13] 高昌源, 付保荣, 李晓军, 等. 辽宁省生物多样性保护优先区识别[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(5):1673-1681.
[14] 曾颖. 生物多样性保护优先区遥感评估与区划[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2017.
[15] 王结臣, 沈定涛, 陈焱明. 基于栅格距离法的缓冲区生成与实现[J]. 科技通报, 2009, 25(5):556-561.
[16] 李崧, 邱微, 赵庆良, 等. 层次分析法应用于黑龙江省生态环境质量评价研究[J]. 环境科学, 2006, 27(5):1031-1034.
[17] 刘锐, 胡伟平, 王红亮, 等. 基于核密度估计的广佛都市区路网演变分析[J]. 地理科学, 2011, 31(1):81-86.
[18] Dudley N. IUCN自然保护地管理分类应用指南[M].朱春全,欧阳志云,译. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2016.
[19] LY/T 3291—2021,自然保护地分类分级[S].
[20] 欧阳志云, 杜傲, 徐卫华. 中国自然保护地体系分类研究[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(20):7207-7215.
[21] Xu Weihua, Pimm S L, Du Ao, et al. Transforming protected area management in China[J]. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2019, 34(9):762-766.
[22] 中共中央办公厅国务院办公厅印发《关于建立以国家公园为主体的自然保护地体系的指导意见》[EB/OL].(2019-06-26)[2023-04-30]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2019-06/26/content_5403497.htm.
[23] 中共中央办公厅国务院办公厅印发《建立国家公园体制总体方案》[EB/OL].(2017-09-26)[2023-04-30]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2017-09/26/content_5227713.htm.
文章导航

/