森林火灾风险评估技术体系探讨
收稿日期: 2023-03-14
修回日期: 2023-04-21
网络出版日期: 2023-06-26
Discussion on the Technical System of Forest Fire Risk Assessment
Received date: 2023-03-14
Revised date: 2023-04-21
Online published: 2023-06-26
综合利用森林火灾致灾危险性、承灾体暴露度、承灾体脆弱性,构建森林火灾风险评估指标体系。致灾危险性选取可燃物、气象条件、野外火源、地形地势等方面的内容为评估指标,承灾体暴露度选取地上活生物量、房屋建筑数量、人口数量、GDP等方面的内容为评估指标,承灾体脆弱性选取易燃林地比例、易燃建筑面积比例、老幼人口数比例、经济活动脆弱性等方面的内容为评估指标。采用层次分析法,通过专家打分的方式,确定各评估指标的权重。将森林火灾风险评估精度细化到小班、30弧秒地理格网,乡镇级、县级等多空间尺度,以满足国家、省、市、县不同行政级别森林防火管理精度需求,同时也为不同地区、不同时期的森林火灾风险识别提出最佳解决方案。
蒋春颖 , 杨雪清 , 张国丽 , 孙志超 , 蒋云安 , 蒋爱军 . 森林火灾风险评估技术体系探讨[J]. 林草资源研究, 2023 , 0(2) : 17 -26 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2023.02.003
The risk assessment index system of forest fire was constructed by comprehensively utilizing the hazard of forest fire,the exposure and vulnerability of disaster bodies.The hazard of disaster was based on the contents of combustibles,meteorological conditions,field fire sources,terrain and topography,the exposure of disaster bodies was based on the contents of above-ground living biomass,number of buildings,population,GDP,and the vulnerability of disaster bodies was based on the proportion of flammable forest land,proportion of combustible building area,proportion of the elderly and young population,vulnerability of economic activities.Using The Analytic Hierarchy Process and expert scoring,this paper determined the weights of each evaluation indicator.It refined the accuracy of forest fire risk assessment to multiple spatial scales such as small class,30 arc second geographic grid,township level,county level,etc.to meet the accuracy requirements of forest fire prevention management at different administrative levels of the country,province,city,and county.At the same time,this paper proposed the best solution for forest fire risk identification in different regions and periods.
Key words: forest fire; hazard; disaster bodies; exposure; vulnerability; risk assessment
| [1] | 杨雪清, 孙志超, 柴政, 等. 全国森林可燃物载量样地调查与预估方法探讨[J]. 林业资源管理, 2022(6):1-6. |
| [2] | 蒋春颖. 2000—2018年中国森林火灾时空特征分析[J]. 林业世界, 2022, 11(2):80-89. |
| [3] | 四川省政府西昌市“3·30”森林火灾事件调查组. 凉山州西昌市“3·30”森林火灾事件调查报告[EB/OL].(2020-12-21)[2023-03-04]. https://yjt.sc.gov.cn/scyjt/gongshigonggao/2020/12/21/93beb952199a4093ab917ae4cf5990e9.shtml. |
| [4] | 中国气象局. 中国气候公报[EB/OL].(2022-02-07)[2023-02-06]. http://fj.cma.gov.cn/xwzx/qxyw/202302/t20230207_5292502_ext.htm. |
| [5] | 田晓瑞, Douglas J M, 张有慧. 森林火险等级预报系统评述[J]. 世界林业研究, 2006(2):39-46. |
| [6] | 田晓瑞, 代玄, 王明玉, 等. 多气候情景下中国森林火灾风险评估[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(3):769-776. |
| [7] | 张继权, 刘兴朋, 佟志军. 草原火灾风险评价与分区——以吉林省西部草原为例[J]. 地理研究, 2007, 26(4):755-762. |
| [8] | Tong Zhijun, Zhang Jiquan, Liu Xingpeng. GIS-based risk assessment of grassland fire disaster in western Jilin Province,China[J]. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2009(23):463-471. |
| [9] | Graham K J, Kinney G F. A practical safety analysis system for hazards control[J]. Journal of Safety Research, 1980, 12(1):13-20. |
| [10] | 张金辉. 森林可燃物燃烧烟气成分及释放量分析[D]. 黑龙江: 东北林业大学, 2007. |
| [11] | 张林生, 李仁. 浅谈林火与气象的关系[J]. 森林防火, 2003(2):22-23. |
| [12] | 田昌勇. 浅析气象因子对林火的影响[J]. 现代农村科技, 2019(7):97. |
| [13] | 骆相宇, 李宗敏. 基于犹豫模糊语言的森林火灾发生风险评估[J]. 林业资源管理, 2020(1):183-190. |
| [14] | 张斌, 姜瑜君, 顾骏强, 等. 区域承灾体脆弱性指标体系与精细量化模型研究[J]. 灾害学, 2010(2):36-40. |
| [15] | 王鹏飞, 李毅, 李晶晶. 涉冬奥会场所森林城市交界域火灾风险评价指标分析[C]// 中国消防协会.2020中国消防协会科学技术年会论文集. 北京: 新华出版社, 2020. |
| [16] | 戚国栋. 肯德尔和谐评价[J]. 山西财经学院学报, 1985(4):54-55. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |