欢迎访问林草资源研究
科学研究

广西野生秋海棠植物资源与园林应用综合评价

  • 高洋洋 ,
  • 黄莹 ,
  • 黄扬 ,
  • 唐文秀 ,
  • 黄仕训 ,
  • 邓涛
展开
  • 1.桂林理工大学 旅游与风景园林学院,广西 桂林 541004
    2.中国科学院广西植物研究所,广西 桂林 541006
高洋洋(1998-),女,四川南充人,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为园林植物应用与造景。Email:gaoyangyang0324@163.com

收稿日期: 2022-12-09

  修回日期: 2023-02-13

  网络出版日期: 2023-05-05

基金资助

广西科技基地与人才专项项目(桂科AD20325009)

Comprehensive Evaluation of Plant Resources and Gardening Application of Wild Begonia in Guangxi

  • Yangyang GAO ,
  • Ying HUANG ,
  • Yang HUANG ,
  • Wenxiu TANG ,
  • Shixun HUANG ,
  • Tao DENG
Expand
  • 1. College of Tourism & Landscape Architecture,Guilin University of Technology,Guilin,Guangxi 541004,China
    2. Chinese Academy of Sciences,Guilin Institute of Botany,Guilin,Guangxi 541006,China

Received date: 2022-12-09

  Revised date: 2023-02-13

  Online published: 2023-05-05

摘要

广西境内的秋海棠属植物资源丰富,开发应用前景广阔。通过对广西野生秋海棠的调查和栽培实验,应用层次分析法和熵权法,对60种广西野生秋海棠进行综合评价,为秋海棠的引种驯化和园林应用等方面提供科学依据。评价体系由观赏特性、生物学特性及开发潜力3个准则层及16个评价因子构成。研究发现:1)伞叶秋海棠等8种植物具有观赏价值高、抗逆性强、适宜范围广、应用方式多样等特点,综合评级为I级;2)黑峰秋海棠等14种植物具有适应性强、养护简单等特点,开发潜力较好,但观赏性稍逊一筹,综合评级为II级;3)桂南秋海棠等18种植物具有养护简单、生长势强等特点,开发应用价值一般,综合评级为Ⅲ级;4)大新秋海棠等13种植物在适应性方面较低,在园林推广应用方面不占优势,但可在特定领域展现出自身价值,综合评级为Ⅳ级;5)崇左秋海棠等7种植物的园林应用价值较低,适应性也较差,可作为种质资源保存在基因库中,综合评级为Ⅴ级。研究建立的野生秋海棠植物资源综合评价体系,对广西乃至全国的野生秋海棠资源开发和利用具有重要的理论和现实意义。

本文引用格式

高洋洋 , 黄莹 , 黄扬 , 唐文秀 , 黄仕训 , 邓涛 . 广西野生秋海棠植物资源与园林应用综合评价[J]. 林草资源研究, 2023 , 0(1) : 104 -114 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2023.01.013

Abstract

Wild Begonias in Guangxi are rich in resources,which have great prospects for development and application.Through the investigation and cultivation experiments of wild Begonia in Guangxi,and by using the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) and the Entropy Weight Method(EWM),this paper comprehensively evaluated 60 species of wild Begonia in Guangxi to provide scientific basis for the introduction,domestication and gardening applications of Begonia.The evaluation system consisted of ornamental characteristics,biological characteristics,development potential and 16 evaluation factors.This study found that:1) 8 species were Class I,such as Begonia umbraculifolia,which had high ornamental value,strong resistance,wide range of suitability,and various applications.2) 14 species were Class II,such as Begonia ferox,which had high ornamental value,strong adaptability,and simple maintenance,with good development potential,but slightly inferior ornamental value.3) 18 species were Class III,such as Begonia austroguangxiensis,which had simple maintenance,strong growth potential,general development and application value.4) 13 species were Class IV,such as Begonia daxinensis,which had low adaptability.They did not have advantages in garden promotion and application,but could show their value in specific areas.5) 7 species were Class V,such as Begonia chongzuoensis,which had low garden application value and poor adaptability.They could be preserved in the gene pool as germplasm resources.The comprehensive evaluation system of wild Begonia resources established in this study has important theoretical and practical significance for the development and utilization of wild Begonia resources in Guangxi and even in China.

参考文献

[1] 邹玲俐, 钟树华, 刘演, 等. 广西野生秋海棠属植物资源调查与园林应用[J]. 南方农业学报, 2015, 46(1):101-106.
[2] 田代科. 中国秋海棠的多样性、保护及开发利用现状[J]. 花木盆景(花卉园艺), 2020(12):4-7.
[3] 郎校安, 王文广, 杨蕾蕾. 仙湖植物园秋海棠属植物应用种类与特征[J]. 广东园林, 2018, 40(3):74-79.
[4] 李慧, 车代弟. 寒地花展花卉种类及应用形式的调查研究[J]. 北方园艺, 2016(11):77-82.
[5] Moonlight P W, Ardi W H, Padilla L A, et al. Dividing and conquering the fastest-growing genus:Towards a natural sectional classification of the mega-diverse genus Begonia(Begoniaceae)[J]. Taxon, 2018, 67(2):267-323.
[6] Rubite R R, Hughes M, Alejandro G J D, et al. Recircumscription of Begonia sect.Baryandra(Begoniaceae):evidence from molecular data[J]. Botanical Studies, 2013, 54(1):38-54.
[7] 余树勋. 秋海棠[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 2000.
[8] Shui Yumin, Peng Ching-I, Wu Chengyi. Synopsis of the Chinese species of Begonia(Begoniaceae),with a reappraisal of sectional delimitation[J]. Botanical Bulletin of Academia Sinica, 2002. 43(4):313-327.
[9] 王文广, 申健勇, 李智宏, 等. 中国秋海棠科一新记录种——小花秋海棠[J]. 植物科学报, 2022, 40(5):593-597.
[10] Tian Daike, Chen Bin, Xiao Yan, et al. Begonia shenzhenensis,a new species of Begoniaceae from Guangdong,China[J]. PhytoKeys, 2021, 178(2):171-177.
[11] Ding Hongbo, Gong Yanxiong, Pan Rui, et al. A new tuberous species of Begonia L.(Begoniaceae)from southern Yunnan,China[J]. Phytotaxa, 2020, 474(1):81-86.
[12] 黄扬, 邓涛, 唐文秀. 秋海棠新品种‘花脸’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S2):201-202.
[13] 黄扬, 邓涛, 唐文秀, 等. 秋海棠新品种‘涟漪’[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(S1):123-124.
[14] 欧静, 杨成华, 耿连娟. 贵州省野生秋海棠属植物观赏特性及应用研究[J]. 中国野生植物资源, 2011, 30(4):21-26.
[15] 李景秀, 管开云, 孔繁才, 等. 中国秋海棠属植物资源概述[J]. 中国野生植物资源, 2021, 40(12):35-44.
[16] 唐文秀, 黄仕训, 盘波, 等. 桂林植物园多肉植物的引种栽培试验研究[J]. 北方园艺, 2009(1):189-192.
[17] 董莉娜, 刘演. 《广西植物志》秋海棠属(Begonia L.)增订[J]. 广西植物, 2019, 39(1):16-39.
[18] Liu Yan, Tseng Yuhsin, Yang Hsunan, et al. Six new species of Begonia from Guangxi,China[J]. Botanical Studies, 2020, 61(1):16-23.
[19] Tong Yi, Tian DaiKe, Shu Jiangping, et al. Begonia yizhouensis,a new species in Begonia sect.Coelocentrum(Begoniaceae)from Guangxi,China[J]. Phytotaxa, 2019, 407(1):59-70.
[20] Tian Daike, Ge Binjie, Xiao Yan, et al. Begonia scorpiuroloba,a new species in Begonia sect.Platycentrum(Begoniaceae)from southern Guangxi of China[J]. Phytotaxa, 2021, 479(2):191-197.
[21] 朱莹, 宋华, 刘恒星, 等. 120个有髯鸢尾品种的园林应用综合评价[J]. 中国园林, 2021, 37(9):101-105.
[22] 宋良红, 郭欢欢, 侯少培, 等. 观赏向日葵观赏价值评价体系的建立[J]. 河南科学, 2015, 33(6):934-937.
[23] 王丽华, 李波, 陈文凯, 等. 亚高山野生乡土木本植物观赏价值评价体系构建[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2021, 27(3):541-548.
[24] 贺国鑫. 北京耐寒蕨类植物表型与适应性评价研究[J]. 林业资源管理, 2022(2):82-90.
[25] 丁友芳, 张万旗. 野生秋海棠的引种栽培与鉴定[M]. 南京: 江苏凤凰科学技术出版社, 2017.
[26] 黄宏文, 李爱荣, 李景秀, 等. 中国迁地栽培植物志——秋海棠科[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2020.
[27] Fang Ding, Wei Yigang, Qin Dehai. Four new species of Begonia L.(Begoniaceae)from Guangxi,China.[J]. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica, 2004(2):170-179.
[28] 董莉娜, 刘演, 许为斌, 等. 广西秋海棠属植物的药用资源[J]. 西北师范大学学报:自然科学版, 2015, 51(4):67-74.
[29] Hu Xiaojian, Liu Cheng, Li Airong, et al. Effect of temperature and moist conditions on seed dormancy cycling of two sympatric limestone species,Begonia guishanensis and Paraiso metrum mileense,in southern China[J]. Seed Science Research, 2020, 30(1):29-36.
[30] 田蔚然, 徐燕玲, 黄莹. 层次分析法和熵权法在城市街道景观评价中的比较分析[J]. 西南师范大学学报:自然科学版, 2020, 45(9):147-153.
[31] 马山水, 林世平, 杨超. 基于熵权TOPSIS法的丛植植物视觉观赏性量化研究[J]. 广东园林, 2021, 43(3):55-60.
[32] 马俊. 生态景观林树种选择与结构配置定量研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江林学院, 2008:1-91.
[33] 黄扬, 唐文秀, 钟树华, 等. 广西特有秋海棠属植物观赏特性评价[J]. 陕西林业科技, 2019, 47(1):16-22.
[34] 陈云飞, 刘芳, 欧明烛, 等. 贵州30种原生秋海棠属植物资源观赏性评价[J]. 种子, 2022, 41(2):70-75.
[35] 王林云, 张智, 徐伟韦, 等. 观叶秋海棠品质性状的综合评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(32):57-63.
[36] 管开云, 李景秀, 李宏哲. 云南秋海棠属植物资源调查研究[J]. 园艺学报, 2005(1):74-80.
文章导航

/