不同抚育方式对白桦次生林生长及土壤养分的影响
收稿日期: 2022-08-31
修回日期: 2022-10-24
网络出版日期: 2023-04-21
基金资助
河北省林业和草原局科学技术研究项目“基于近自然理念的恒续林经营技术”(2103045)
Effects of Different Tending Methods on Tree Growth and Soil Nutrients in Secondary Birch Forest
Received date: 2022-08-31
Revised date: 2022-10-24
Online published: 2023-04-21
以河北省木兰围场国有林场白桦林为研究对象,分析不同抚育方式对林木生长和土壤理化性质的影响。结果表明:1) 胸径。传统经营对胸径生长没有影响,均质经营4年后显著高于对照。2) 树高。对树高生长没有影响。3) 冠幅。2年时均质经营>传统经营>对照,都显著;4,6年时二者仍显著高于对照,但二者之间差异不显著。4) 蓄积年平均生长量。2年内差异不显著,4,6年后均质经营显著高于传统经营和对照。5) pH值。在0~20 cm和20~40 cm的土层,都是差异不显著。6)在0~20 cm的土层,有机质含量、碱解氮含量、有效磷含量、速效钾含量都是均质经营>传统经营>对照,差异显著。在20~40 cm的土层,速效钾含量没有差异;碱解氮含量是均质经营>传统经营>对照,差异显著;有效磷含量是对照>传统经营>均质经营,差异显著;机质含量为均质经营显著高于传统经营和对照,但传统经营和对照没有差异。
王辉 , 陈爱桃 , 徐丽 . 不同抚育方式对白桦次生林生长及土壤养分的影响[J]. 林草资源研究, 2022 , 0(zk1) : 85 -90 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2022.S0.013
This paper analyzed the effects of different tending methods on the tree growth and soil physicochemical properties in birch forest,based on a research conducted in a birch forest of Hebei Mulan Weichang State-owned Forest Farm.The results showed that:1)Effects on DBH:No significant difference between UM and CK,while the effect of quality management(QM)was significantly higher than the CK after 4 years.2)Effects on tree height:There was no significant difference on tree height growth.3)Effects on crown width:QM>UM>CK after 2 years,significantly;QM and UM both were significantly higher than the CK after 4 and 6 years,but there was no significant difference between QM and UM.4)Effects on average annual volume growth:No significant difference among QM,UM,and CK after 2 years.However,QM was significantly higher than UM and CK after 4 and 6 years.5)There was no significant difference of effect on PH value in 0~20 cm and 20~40 cm soil layers.6)In the 0~20 cm soil layer,the content of organic matter,alkali-hydrolyzed nitrogen,available phosphorus,and available potassium were all QM>UM>CK,with significant differences.In the 20~40 cm soil layer,there was no difference in the content of available potassium;the content of alkali hydrolyzed nitrogen was QM>UM>CK,with significant differences;effective phosphorus content was CK>UM>QM,with significant differences;the organic matter content of QM was significantly higher than that of UM and CK,but there was no difference between UM and CK.
| [1] | 凌继华, 王丽, 张鸿景. 木兰林管局白桦次生林经营的建议[J]. 河北林业科技, 2010(3):57. |
| [2] | 李久贵, 孟宪友. 次生林的经营管理[J]. 林业勘查设计, 2005(2):43. |
| [3] | 朱教君. 次生林经营基础研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2002, 13(12):1689-1694. |
| [4] | 刘忠君, 郑秀梅. 次生林的特点分析[J]. 林业勘查设计, 2005(4):19-20. |
| [5] | 张水松, 林光, 陈长发, 等. 次生常绿阔叶林抚育改造技术的研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 1997(5):57-64. |
| [6] | 管惠文, 董希斌, 张甜, 等. 抚育间伐后落叶松天然次生林生境恢复效果的评价[J]. 东北林业大学报, 2019, 47(7):6-13. |
| [7] | 胡雪凡, 张会儒, 周超凡, 等. 不同抚育间伐方式对蒙古栎次生林空间结构的影响[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2019, 41(5):137-147. |
| [8] | 王智勇, 董希斌, 张甜, 等. 抚育间伐强度对落叶松天然次生林林分结构及健康的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2018, 46(11):1-7. |
| [9] | 路兴慧, 臧润国, 丁易, 等. 抚育措施对热带次生林群落植物功能性状和功能多样性的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2015, 23(1):79-88. |
| [10] | 刘忠玲, 姚颖, 刘建明, 等. 抚育间伐对白桦天然次生林枯落物与土壤持水特性的影响[J]. 森林工程, 2020, 36(4):29-37. |
| [11] | Jactel H, Gritti E S, Dr?ssler L, et al. Positive biodiversity-productivity relationships in forests:Climate matters[J]. Biology Letters, 2018, 14(4):20170747. |
| [12] | Zhang Y, Chen H Y H, Reich P B. Forest productivity increases with evenness,species richness and trait variation:A globalmeta-analysis[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2012, 100(3):742-749. |
| [13] | 周志立, 张丽玮, 陈倩, 等. 木兰围场3种典型林分枯落物及土壤持水能力[J]. 水土保持学报, 2015, 29(1):207-213. |
| [14] | 郭梦娇. 辽河源地区典型林分森林生态系统服务功能评估研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2016. |
| [15] | 王辉, 张章, 曹运强, 等. 森林近自然流域经营关键技术[J]. 河北林业科技, 2018(4):53-55. |
| [16] | 邬可义, 陈绍志, 徐成立, 等. 以目标树为构架的人工林全林经营与天然次生林的转化研究——河北木兰林管局森林经营新探索[J]. 林业经济, 2015, 37(1):56-61. |
| [17] | 王艳军, 王辉, 陈爱桃. 木兰林场森林近自然经营实践[J]. 林业科技通讯, 2021(8):46-49. |
| [18] | 李朝英, 郑路. 土壤pH测定的影响因素探讨[J]. 上海农业学报, 2021, 37(1):47-52. |
| [19] | 张勇强, 李智超, 厚凌宇, 等. 林分密度对杉木人工林下物种多样性和土壤养分的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2020, 57(1):239-250. |
| [20] | 杨芹芹. 城市人工林土壤养分状况与微生物群落结构的研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2012. |
| [21] | 于伟斌. 白桦人工林抚育间伐试验研究[J]. 农林科技, 2014(3):21. |
| [22] | 白育英. 大青山白桦次生林经营技术研究[J]. 干旱区资料与环境, 2000(1):90-94. |
| [23] | Bell T H, Klironomos J N, Henry H A L. Seasonal response of extracellular enzyme activity and microbial biomass to warming and nitrogen addition[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2010, 74(3):820-828. |
| [24] | Teste F P, Lieffers V J, Strelkov S E. Ectomycorrhizal community responses to intensive forest management:Thinning alters impacts of fertilization[J]. Plant and Soil, 2012, 360(1/2):333-347. |
| [25] | Dang P, Gao Y, Liu J L, et al. Effects of thinning intensity on understory vegetation and soil microbial communities of a mature Chinese pine plantation in the Loess Plateau[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2018, 630:171-180. |
| [26] | 李春辉. 不同抚育强度对侧柏林下土壤养分含量的影响[J]. 防护林科技, 2017(5):61-62. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |