干旱胁迫对沙米叶片结构性状与光合色素含量的影响
收稿日期: 2021-12-03
修回日期: 2022-03-07
网络出版日期: 2022-06-13
Effects of Forestry Drought Stress on Leaf Structure Traits and Leaf Pigment Content of Agriophyllum squarrosum
Received date: 2021-12-03
Revised date: 2022-03-07
Online published: 2022-06-13
1a生草本植物沙米(Agriophyllum squarrosum)是西北干旱区植被恢复建设的重要经济草本,目前干旱胁迫程度对于沙米叶片功能性状的影响并未完全厘清,一定程度上限制了沙米的应用场景和生态用途。以沙米为研究对象,设置4个水分梯度的盆栽控水实验(即CK,LD,MD,ED。其处理分别为田间持水量的90%±5%,70%±5%,50%±5%,30%±5%),探究沙米上下层叶片的结构性状与光合色素含量对干旱胁迫程度的响应特征。结果表明:1)随着干旱胁迫程度增加,沙米叶片的比叶面积(SLA)、叶片相对含水量(LRWC)、总叶绿素含量(Chl)及叶绿素a(Chl a)含量均显著降低,但轻度干旱处理(LD处理)时差异不显著;2)尽管叶片组织密度(LTD)、干物质含量(LDMC)随干旱胁迫程度增加而逐渐增加,但各处理间的差异并未达到显著水平;3)叶绿素b含量(Chl b)在干旱作用下仅发生了轻微降低,类胡萝卜素含量(Car)在各干旱处理间的变化较小;4)4种水分处理下,沙米叶片SLA和LRWC在叶位上存在显著差异,即上层叶片SLA高于下层叶片12.34%,上层叶片LRWC低于下层叶片4.37%。干旱胁迫与叶位对沙米叶片LRWC存在显著的交互作用。因此,在选择沙米进行大规模植被恢复时,叶片相对含水量可以作为衡量沙米个体适应土壤水分变化的重要生理指标。
张家琦 , 郑冬梅 , 朱凯 . 干旱胁迫对沙米叶片结构性状与光合色素含量的影响[J]. 林草资源研究, 2022 , 0(2) : 157 -163 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2022.02.021
The annual herb Agriophyllum squarrosum is an important economic herb for vegetation restoration and construction in the arid area of Northwest China. At present,the impact of drought stress on the functional properties of its leaves has not been fully clarified,which limits the application scenario and ecological use of it to a certain extent. Taking A.squarrosum as the research object,this paper set up four pot water control experiments with water gradients (CK,LD,MD and ED treatments were 90% ± 5%,70%±5%,50%±5% and 30%±5% of the field water capacity respectively),to explore the response characteristics of structural characters of upper and lower leaves and photosynthetic pigment content of A.squarrosum to different degrees of drought stress. The results showed that:1) the response of leaf traits of A.squarrosum at different leaf positions to drought was basically the same. With the increase of drought stress,the specific leaf area (SLA),leaf relative water content (LRWC),total chlorophyll content (Chl) and chlorophyll a content of A.squarrosum leaves decreased significantly,but the time difference of light drought treatment (LD treatment) was not significant. 2) Although the leaf tissue density (LTD) and dry matter content (LDMC) increased gradually with the degree of drought stress,the difference among the treatments did not reach a significant level. 3) The content of chlorophyll b (Chl b) decreased only slightly under drought,and the content of carotenoid (Car) changed little among drought treatments. 4)Under the four water treatments,there were significant differences in leaf position between SLA and LRWC of A.squarrosum leaves,the SLA of upper leaves was 12.34% higher than that of lower leaves,and its LRWC was 4.37% lower than that of lower leaves. There was a significant interaction between drought stress and leaf position on LRWC in A.squarrosum leaves. Therefore,when selecting A.squarrosum for large-scale vegetation restoration,the relative water content of leaves can be used as an important physiological index to measure the individual adaptation of A.squarrosum to soil water changes. The results can provide a theoretical reference for vegetation restoration and sustainable ecological management of forest and grass in sandy areas.
| [1] | 张德魁, 魏林源, 马全林, 等. 民勤沙区典型一年生植物沙米构件特征研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 35(27):48-53. |
| [2] | 任文明, 刘雪峰, 倪春梅. 毛乌素沙漠天然沙米营养成分的分析[J]. 内蒙古农业大学学报, 2005, 26(2):88-90 |
| [3] | 任杰, 赵成章, 赵夏纬, 等. 金塔绿洲荒漠交错带沙蓬根系分形特征[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(15):5298-5305. |
| [4] | 聂峰杰, 甘晓燕, 张丽, 等. 沙米生长特性调查及遗传多样性分析[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2020, 38(6):1-8. |
| [5] | 赵哈林, 曲浩, 周瑞莲, 等. 沙埋对沙米幼苗生长、存活及光合蒸腾特性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(18):5574-5579. |
| [6] | 王祺, 马全林, 陈芳, 等, 沙生经济植物沙米出苗土壤水分阈值研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(26):98-104. |
| [7] | 陈芳, 马全林, 魏林源, 等. 沙米(Agriophyllum squarrosum)种子库空间分布和影响因素[J]. 中国沙漠, 2020, 40(4):190-196. |
| [8] | 尹成亮, 赵杰才, 胡进玲, 等. 环境异质性对潜在粮食作物沙米表型变异的影响[J]. 中国科学:生命科学, 2016, 46(11):1324-1335. |
| [9] | 魏海霞, 董庆芝, 周忠科, 等. 毛乌素沙地不同生境主要植物叶性状研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2022, 36(1):173-177. |
| [10] | 刘晓娟, 马克平. 植物功能性状研究进展[J]. 中国科学:生命科学, 2015, 45(4):325-339. |
| [11] | 王鑫, 杨磊, 赵倩, 等. 黄土高原典型小流域草地群落功能性状对土壤水分的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2020(8):1-7. |
| [12] | 张曦, 王振南, 陆姣云, 等. 紫花苜蓿叶性状对干旱的阶段性响应[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(9):2669-2676. |
| [13] | Letts M G, Rodríguez-Calcerrada J, Rolo V, et al. 2012. Long-term physiological and morphological acclimation by the evergreen shrub Buxus sempervirens L.to understory and canopy gap light intensities[J]. Trees,2012, 26:479-491. |
| [14] | Bongers F J, Olmo M, Lopez-Iglesias B, et al. Drought responses,phenotypic plasticity and survival of Mediterranean species in two different microclimatic sites[J]. Plant biology, 2017, 19:386-395. |
| [15] | 李玉霖, 崔建垣, 苏永中. 不同沙丘生境主要植物比叶面积和叶干物质含量的比较[J]. 生态学报, 2005, 25(2):304-311. |
| [16] | 许爱云, 曹兵, 谢云. 干旱风沙区煤炭基地12种草本植物对干旱胁迫的生理生态响应及抗旱性评价[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(10):22-34. |
| [17] | 张恒硕, 查同刚, 李肖, 等. 冀北地区6种灌木对干旱胁迫的光合及生理响应[J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(2):352-362. |
| [18] | 郭卫华, 李波, 张新时, 等. 水分胁迫对沙棘(Hippophae rhamnoides)和中间锦鸡儿(Caragana intermedia)蒸腾作用影响的比较[J]. 生态学报, 2007, 27(10):4132-4140. |
| [19] | 郭冰寒, 王若水, 肖辉杰. 沙棘苗期叶水势与气孔导度对水分胁迫的响应[J]. 核农学报, 2018, 32(3):609-616. |
| [20] | Wright I J, Reich P B, Westoby M, et al. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum[J]. Nature, 2004, 428:821. |
| [21] | 孙娅楠, 赵杨, 赵渊祥, 等. 棕榈幼苗光合和叶绿素荧光对干旱胁迫及复水的响应[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2021, 41(9):45-52. |
| [22] | 张路, 张启翔, 高亦珂, 等. 转基因地被菊晚粉抗旱生理特性研究[J]. 华北农学报, 2011, 26(5):181-185. |
| [23] | 时丽冉, 王玉平, 刘国荣, 等. 干旱胁迫对地被菊光合生理特性及水分利用率的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2011, 40(3):119-121. |
| [24] | 胡颂平, 王正功, 张琳, 等. 干旱胁迫下水稻叶片光合速率与叶绿素含量的相关性及其基因定位[J]. 中国生物化学与分子生物学报, 2007, 23(11):926-932. |
| [25] | 李芳兰, 包维楷, 吴宁. 白刺花幼苗对不同强度干旱胁迫的形态与生理响应[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(10):5407-5416. |
| [26] | 王好运, 吴峰, 吴昌明, 等. 马尾松不同叶型幼苗对干旱及复水的生长及生理响应[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2018, 46(1):1-6. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |