欢迎访问林草资源研究
技术应用

基于无人机LiDAR特征变量的南方集体林区蓄积量估测

  • 杜志 ,
  • 陈振雄 ,
  • 马开森 ,
  • 刘紫薇 ,
  • 顾兴贵
展开
  • 1.国家林业和草原局中南调查规划设计院,长沙 410014
    2.中南林业科技大学,长沙 410004
杜志(1986-),男,湖南长沙人,工程师,硕士,研究方向:森林资源监测与评价。Email: 674862391@qq.com

收稿日期: 2021-06-16

  修回日期: 2021-07-14

  网络出版日期: 2021-09-26

基金资助

国家林草局自主研发计划项目(LC-1-04);湖南省研究生科研创新项目(CX20200705);中南林业科技大学研究生科技创新基金(CX20201006)

Estimating Standing Volume in Southern Collective Forest Region Based on the Unmanned Aerial Vehicle LiDAR Characteristic Variables

  • Zhi DU ,
  • Zhenxiong CHEN ,
  • Kaisen MA ,
  • Ziwei LIU ,
  • Xinggui GU
Expand
  • 1. Central South Inventory and Planning Institute of National Forestry and Grassland Administration,Changsha 410014,China
    2. Central South University of Forestry & Technology,Changsha 410004,China

Received date: 2021-06-16

  Revised date: 2021-07-14

  Online published: 2021-09-26

摘要

基于广西壮族自治区森林资源年度监测评价成果数据,采用逐步回归选择机载激光雷达特征变量,建立多元线性回归、Logistic回归和随机森林模型,预测南方集体林区桉树、杉木和天然阔叶林样地的蓄积量。结果表明:1)桉树和杉木样地的逐步回归特征变量多为高度和强度变量,而天然阔叶林样地则是间隙率、覆盖度、叶面积指数等综合变量;2)桉树和天然阔叶林样地,随机森林模型的蓄积量估测精度(桉树R2=0.97,RMSE=12.60m3/hm2;天然阔叶林:R2=0.90,RMSE=18.45m3/hm2)高于多元线性回归和Logistic回归模型,而杉木样地在多元线性回归模型中得到了最优的蓄积量估测结果(R2=0.91,RMSE=24.30m3/hm2);3)在3种模型估测精度中,人工桉树和杉木样地均优于天然阔叶林样地。可见,高密度的激光雷达点云可以获取更优的特征变量,针对复杂的样地条件需要灵活选择估测模型实现蓄积量调查,以便为林草部门进行森林资源调查、监测和经营管理提供科学依据。

本文引用格式

杜志 , 陈振雄 , 马开森 , 刘紫薇 , 顾兴贵 . 基于无人机LiDAR特征变量的南方集体林区蓄积量估测[J]. 林草资源研究, 2021 , 0(4) : 157 -165 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2021.04.020

Abstract

Based on the annual monitoring and evaluation data of forest resources in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region,the characteristic variables of airborne LiDAR were selected with the stepwise regression,and multiple linear regression,logistic regression and random forest models were established to predict the volume of sample plots of Eucalyptus robusta,Cunninghamia lanceolate and natural broad-leaved forest in southern collective forest region.The results showed that:1) For the plots of Eucalyptus robusta and Cunninghamia lanceolate,the stepwise regression characteristic variables were mainly height and intensity variables,while for the natural broad-leaved forest plots,they were comprehensive variables,such as clearance ratio,coverage,and leaf area index;2) For Eucalyptus robusta and natural broad-leaved forest plots,the estimation accuracy( Eucalyptus robusta:R 2=0.97,RMSE=12.60 m3/hm2;natural broad-leaved:R2=0.90,RMSE=18.45 m3/hm2) of the volume of the random forest model was higher than that of the multiple linear regression and logistic regression models,for the Cunninghamia lanceolate plot,the multiple linear regression model obtained the best estimation result(R 2=0.91,RMSE=24.30 m3/hm2);3) Among the estimation accuracy of the three models,the artificial Eucalyptus robusta and Cunninghamia lanceolate plots were higher than of the natural broad-leaved forest plots.It can be seen that the high-density LiDAR point cloud can obtain better characteristic variables.In view of the complex sample plot conditions,we need to flexibly select the estimation model to realize the volume survey,which can provide a scientific basis for the forestry and grassland authorities to carry out the forest resources survey,monitoring and management.

参考文献

[1] Organization A. FAO Voluntary Guidelines on National Forest Monitoring[M]. Italy:Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2017.
[2] Zhao Panpan, Lu Dengsheng, Wang Guangxing, et al. Forest aboveground biomass estimation in Zhejiang Province using the integration of Landsat TM and ALOS PALSAR data[J]. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2016, 53:1-15.
[3] Zhang Yuanxun, Schauer J J, Zhang Yuanhang, et al. Correction to characteristics of particulate carbon emissions from real-world Chinese coal combustion[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2017, 51(8):4734.
[4] Di Cosmo L, Gasparini P, Tabacchi G. A national-scale,stand-level model to predict total above-ground tree biomass from growing stock volume[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2016, 361:269-276.
[5] 汤旭光, 刘殿伟, 王宗明, 等. 森林地上生物量遥感估算研究进展[J]. 生态学杂志, 2012, 31(5):1311-1318.
[6] Cao Lin, Coops N C, Innes J L, et al. Estimation of forest biomass dynamics in subtropical forests using multi-temporal airborne LiDAR data[J]. Remote Sens.Environ. 2016, 178:158-171.
[7] 李增元, 刘清旺, 庞勇. 激光雷达森林参数反演研究进展[J]. 遥感学报, 2016, 20(5):1138-1150.
[8] 刘琼阁, 彭道黎, 涂云燕. 基于偏最小二乘回归的森林蓄积量遥感估测[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2014, 34(2):81-84.
[9] 洪奕丰, 林辉, 严恩萍, 等. 基于偏最小二乘法的平南县森林蓄积量估测模型研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2011, 31(7):80-85.
[10] 曾伟生, 孙乡楠, 王六如, 等. 基于机载激光雷达数据的森林蓄积量模型研建[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(2):31-38.
[11] 侯晓静, 明金科, 秦荣水, 等. 基于随机森林模型的交界域火灾风险分析[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(8):194-200.
[12] 陈妍, 宋豫秦, 王伟. 基于随机森林回归的草场植被盖度反演模型研究——以新疆阿勒泰地区布尔津县为例[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(7):2384-2394.
[13] 袁钰娜, 彭道黎, 王威, 等. 利用机载激光雷达技术估测东北林区典型针叶林的蓄积量[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(3):836-844.
[14] 邢艳秋, 姚松涛, 李梦颖, 等. 基于机载全波形LiDAR数据的森林地上生物量估测算法研究[J]. 森林工程, 2017, 33(4):21-26.
[15] 李平昊, 申鑫, 代劲松, 等. 机载激光雷达人工林单木分割方法比较和精度分析[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(12):127-136.
[16] 李欢, 李明泽, 范文义, 等. 基于机载激光雷达的林隙结构参数提取[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(10):98-107.
[17] 耿林, 李明泽, 范文义, 等. 基于机载LiDAR的单木结构参数及林分有效冠的提取[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(7):62-72.
[18] Zhang Wuming, Qi Jianbo, Wan Peng, et al. An easy-to-use airborne LiDAR data filtering method based on cloth simulation[J]. Remote Sensing, 2016, 8(6):501.
[19] Yan Wanqian, Guan Haiyan, Cao Lin, et al. A self-adaptive mean shift tree-segmentation method Using UAV LiDAR data[J]. Remote Sensing, 2020, 12(3):515.
[20] 邢涛, 汪献义, 邢艳秋. 基于特征选择的TLS蒙古栎人工林点云分类研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2020, 40(3):1-7.
[21] 范文义, 李明泽, 杨金明. 长白山林区森林生物量遥感估测模型[J]. 林业科学, 2011, 47(10):16-20.
[22] 庞勇, 李增元, 陈尔学, 等. 激光雷达技术及其在林业上的应用[J]. 林业科学, 2005, 41(3):129-136.
[23] Minh D H T, Le Toan T, Rocca F, et al. SAR tomography for the retrieval of forest biomass and height:cross-validation at two tropical forest sites in French Guiana[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2016, 175:138-147.
文章导航

/