欢迎访问林草资源研究
科学研究

“两区”建设背景下坝上生态安全格局构建与优化研究

  • 王彦芳 ,
  • 代庭继 ,
  • 刘孟竹 ,
  • 裴宏伟 ,
  • 郭晓楠
展开
  • 1.河北地质大学 土地科学与空间规划学院 自然资源与环境遥感研究中心,石家庄 050031
    2.河北建筑工程学院 市政与环境工程系,河北 张家口 075000
王彦芳(1984-),女,内蒙古乌兰察布人,讲师,主要从事生态遥感、生态环境建设等方面的研究。Email: wangyanfang517@126.com

收稿日期: 2021-06-19

  修回日期: 2021-07-13

  网络出版日期: 2021-09-26

基金资助

河北省社科基金“两区”建设背景下坝上生态安全格局构建与优化研究(HB19YJ041)

Establishment and Optimization of Ecological Security Pattern in Bashang Area under the Background of "Two-District" Construction

  • Yanfang WANG ,
  • Tingji DAI ,
  • Mengzhu Liu ,
  • Hongwei PEI ,
  • Xiaonan GUO
Expand
  • 1. Natural Resources and Environmental Remote Sensing Research Center,School of Land Science and Spatial Planning,Hebei GEO University,Shijiazhuang 050031,China
    2. School of Municipal and Environmental Engineering,Hebei University of Architecture,Zhangjiakou,Hebei 075000,China

Received date: 2021-06-19

  Revised date: 2021-07-13

  Online published: 2021-09-26

摘要

河北坝上地区作为首都“两区”建设的重点区域,其生态安全格局的构建与优化对当地和京津冀区域可持续发展具有重要意义。以2018年土地利用状况为基础,采用InVEST模型计算坝上地区生境质量指数并提取生态源地,选择最小累积阻力模型,构建最小累积阻力表面,划分不同等级的生态安全区,提取生态廊道,并构建河北坝上地区生态安全格局。研究表明:1)坝上地区生境质量总体偏低,50%以上为低等生境质量区,中高等生境质量区约占46%,呈现出生境质量两极分化,类型和分布不均衡等特点;2)生态源地占坝上总面积的17.50%,其中40%以上分布在围场满族蒙古族自治县;3)生态廊道总长度为640.86km,生态节点53个,高等质量生态安全区占25.92%,低等级质量的生态安全区主要分布在张北县、康保县。坝上地区生态安全质量不是很高、生态系统多样性较低,生态资源在空间上分布不平衡,县区之间生态质量差异明显。未来应进一步提升低等级生态区域生态质量,构建更加稳固的生态安全格局。

本文引用格式

王彦芳 , 代庭继 , 刘孟竹 , 裴宏伟 , 郭晓楠 . “两区”建设背景下坝上生态安全格局构建与优化研究[J]. 林草资源研究, 2021 , 0(4) : 104 -113 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2021.04.014

Abstract

Bashang area in Hebei Province is the core area of the "two-district" construction for the capital city Beijing,its establishment and optimization of ecological security pattern is of great significance for sustainable ecological development in local area and region of Beijing,Tianjin and Hebei.Ecological sources were extracted from habitat quality index calculated by InVEST model based on the land use data of 2018.The minimum cumulative resistance model was selected to build the minimum cumulative resistance surface.This paper divided ecological security zones into different levels,extracted ecological corridors,and developed ecological security pattern of Hebei Bashang area.The results showed that(1) The habitat quality in Bashang area was generally low,with over 50% of the area at a low level and 46% at medium and high level,presenting the characteristics of polarization of habitat quality,and imbalance in type and distribution,etc.;(2) The ecological source area accounted for 17.50% of the total area of Bashang,and more than 40% of the ecological source area was distributed in Weichang Manchu and Mongolian Autonomous County;(3) The total length of the ecological corridor was 640.86km,and there were 53 ecological nodes.The ecological security zones of high quality in Bashang area accounted for 25.92%,and the ecological security zones of low quality were mainly distributed in Zhangbei County and Kangbao County.The quality of ecological security in Bashang was not very high,the diversity of ecological system was low,the distribution of ecological resources was not balanced in space,and the difference of ecological quality between counties and districts was obvious.In the future,the ecological quality of low-grade ecological regions should be further improved,and a more stable ecological security pattern should be established.

参考文献

[1] 彭建, 赵会娟, 刘焱序, 等. 区域生态安全格局构建研究进展与展望[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(3):407-419.
[2] 韩宗伟, 焦胜, 胡亮, 等. 廊道与源地协调的国土空间生态安全格局构建[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(10):2244-2256.
[3] 叶鑫, 邹长新, 刘国华, 等. 生态安全格局研究的主要内容与进展[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(10):3382-3392.
[4] Fu Yangjun, Shi Xueyi, He Juan, et al. Identification and optimization strategy of county ecological security pattern:A case study in the Loess Plateau,China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2020, 112:106030.
[5] 汤峰, 王力, 张涛. 基于生态保护红线和生态网络的县域生态安全格局构建[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(9):263-272.
[6] 黄木易, 岳文泽, 冯少茹. 基于MCR模型的大别山核心区生态安全格局异质性及优化[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(4):771-784.
[7] 董立龙. 建设首都“后花园” 撑起环境“生态伞”[N]. 河北日报, 2019-08-15(6).
[8] Lin Qian, Mao Jiaying, Wu Jiansheng, et al. Ecological security pattern analysis based on InVEST and Least-cost path model:A case study of dongguan water village[J]. Sustainability, 2016, 8(2):172.
[9] 郝月, 张娜, 杜亚娟, 等. 基于生境质量的唐县生态安全格局构建[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(3):1015-1024.
[10] 慕正隆. 河湟地区生态安全格局构建研究[D]. 兰州:西北师范大学, 2018.
[11] 刘孟竹, 张红娟, 王彦芳, 等. 基于土地利用的北方农牧交错带生境质量研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2021, 28(3):156-162.
[12] 刘方田, 许尔琪. 基于土地利用的新疆兵团与非兵团生境质量时空演变的对比[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(7):2341-2351.
[13] 张梦迪, 张芬, 李雄. 基于InVEST模型的生境质量评价——以北京市通州区为例[J]. 风景园林, 2020, 27(6):95-99.
[14] 吴健生, 曹祺文, 石淑芹, 等. 基于土地利用变化的京津冀生境质量时空演变[J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(11):3457-3466.
[15] 吴茂全, 胡蒙蒙, 汪涛, 等. 基于生态安全格局与多尺度景观连通性的城市生态源地识别[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 3913:4720-4731.
[16] 吴可, 李寒冰, 韩博. 山东省生态安全格局识别及优化策略研究[J]. 林业资源管理, 2020(3):89-94.
[17] 刘媛. 基于MCR模型的志丹县土地利用生态安全格局构建[D]. 西安:长安大学, 2017.
[18] 王君一. 天津市土地利用生态安全格局构建研究[D]. 天津:天津工业大学, 2019.
[19] 赵良飞, 王旭, 王永刚, 等. 基于MCR模型的神东矿区景观生态安全格局构建研究[J]. 能源环境保护, 2020, 34(6):81-88.
[20] 岳德鹏, 于强, 张启斌, 等. 区域生态安全格局优化研究进展[J]. 农业机械学报, 2017, 48(2):1-10.
[21] 邓金杰, 陈柳新, 杨成韫, 等. 高度城市化地区生态廊道重要性评价探索——以深圳为例[J]. 地理研究, 2017, 36(3):573-582.
文章导航

/