欢迎访问林草资源研究
综合管理

全球竹产品贸易网络特征分析

  • 周莹莹 ,
  • 李慧娟 ,
  • 程宝栋 ,
  • 马豪宇
展开
  • 1.北京林业大学 经济管理学院,北京 100083
    2.太原市林业科学研究所,太原 030000
周莹莹(1990-),女,河南周口人,在读博士,主要研究方向为林产品市场与贸易。Email: zyy6259@163.com

收稿日期: 2021-05-18

  修回日期: 2021-06-28

  网络出版日期: 2021-08-04

基金资助

国家林草局重点项目(2130237);国家自然科学基金面上项目(72073012);国家自然科学基金面上项目(71873016)

Analysis of Network Structure Characteristics of Bamboo Products

  • Yingying ZHOU ,
  • Huijuan LI ,
  • Baodong CHENG ,
  • Haoyu MA
Expand
  • 1. School of Economics and Management,Beijing Forestry University,Beijing 100083,China
    2. Taiyuan Institute of Forestry Sciences,Taiyuan 030000,China

Received date: 2021-05-18

  Revised date: 2021-06-28

  Online published: 2021-08-04

摘要

利用社会网络分析方法构建2017—2019年全球竹产品贸易网络,从整体网络特征、网络中心度、块模型和主要贸易国家等4个方面研究全球竹产品贸易网络特征。结果表明:5种竹产品贸易网络总体关系均较为稀疏,但竹制品贸易网络的连通性、扩散性、稳定性及集聚程度相对较强;网络节点度数中心度的“核心-边缘”特征明显,与进口网络相比,竹产品出口市场集中度更高。5种竹产品贸易网络均可划分为4个板块,且板块1均为内外贸易关系较为紧密的双向溢出板块。竹产品贸易大国网络呈现以中国为核心的星形分布,贸易关系主要发生在亚洲、美洲和欧洲之间。以中国为主的亚太“贸易圈”和以美国为主的欧美“贸易圈”是当前全球竹产品贸易网络中最主要的2大社群。

本文引用格式

周莹莹 , 李慧娟 , 程宝栋 , 马豪宇 . 全球竹产品贸易网络特征分析[J]. 林草资源研究, 2021 , 0(3) : 38 -46 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2021.03.007

Abstract

The paper built the global bamboo products trade networks from 2017 to 2019 according to social network analysis methods,and studied the trade network from four aspects:overall network characte-ristics,network centrality,blocks,and main trade countries. The results showed that the overall densities of the five networks were relatively sparse,while the connectivity,diffusion,stability and concentration of the bamboo products trade network were relatively strong. The "core-periphery" feature of the degree centrality of the network nodes was obvious. Compared with the import network,the bamboo products export market was more concentrated. Each of the five networks can be divided into four blocks,and block 1 was always a two-way spillover block with close internal and external trade relations. The networks of major bamboo products trading countries presented a star-shaped distribution with China as the core,and trade relations mainly occurred among Asia,America and Europe. The Asia-Pacific "trade circle" with China as the core and the European and American "trade circle" with the United States as the core were the two most important communities in the current global bamboo products trade network.

参考文献

[1] Wu W G, Liu Q, Zhu Z, et al. Managing Bamboo for Carbon Sequestration,Bamboo Stem and Bamboo Shoots[J]. Small-scale Forestry, 2015, 14(2):233-243.
[2] Sujarwo W. Stand biomass and carbon storage of bamboo forest in Penglipuran traditional village,Bali(Indonesia)[J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 2016, 27(4):191-195.
[3] Dwivedi A K, Kumar A, Baredar P, et al. Bamboo as a complementary crop to address climate change and livelihoods - Insights from India[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 2019(102):66-74.
[4] 周鹏飞. 碳足迹评估对竹产品企业的潜在影响及策略选择[D]. 杭州:浙江农林大学, 2015.
[5] 窦营, 蒋琴儿. 竹产品国际贸易现状分析与对策[J]. 企业经济, 2008(6):137-139.
[6] 樊宝敏, 李智勇, 陈勇. 中国竹藤资源现状及发展潜力分析[J]. 林业资源管理, 2004(1):18-20.
[7] 滕凤英. 中国主要竹藤产品的国际竞争优势与提升策略[J]. 林产工业, 2020, 57(1):70-71.
[8] 吴君琦, 张禹. 世界竹藤商品贸易现状及趋势[J]. 世界林业研究, 2009, 22(3):69-71.
[9] 韩黛娜. 日韩竹木家具进出口市场分析[J]. 林产工业, 2020, 57(3):86-88.
[10] Huang L, Chen K, Zhou M, et al. Gravity models of China's bamboo and rattan products exports:applications to trade potential analysis[J]. Forest Products Journal, 2019, 69(4):337-344.
[11] Rana M P, Mukul S A, Sohel M S I, et al. Economics and Employment Generation of Bamboo-Based Enterprises:A Case Study from Eastern Bangladesh[J]. Small-scale Forestry, 2010, 9(1):41-51.
[12] 盛开, 蒋琴儿. 全球活竹贸易格局及中国的影响力分析[J]. 宁夏大学学报:人文社会科学版, 2020, 42(1):155-161.
[13] Brass D J, Galaskiewicz J, Greve H R, et al. Taking Stock of Networks and Organizations:A Multilevel Perspective[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2004, 47(6):795-817.
[14] Crossley, N., Bellotti, E., Edwards, G, et al. Social Network Analysis for Ego-Nets[M]. London,UK:Sage Publications Ltd, 2015.
[15] Lazega E, Wasserman S, Faust K, et al. Social network analysis:methods and applications[J]. Revue Franaise De Sociologie, 1995, 36(4):781-783.
[16] Wang C, Huang X, Lim M K, et al. Mapping the structural evolution in the global scrap copper trade network[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 275:122934.
[17] Meng B, Xiao H, Ye J B, et al. Are global value chains truly global? A new perspective based on the measure of trade in value-added[J]. IDE Discussion Papers, 2019, 736:1-27.
[18] JESSE C. SHORE.Market formation as transitive closure:The evolving pattern of trade in music[J]. Network Science, 2016, 4(2):164-187.
[19] 韩梦玮, 李双琳. “一带一路”海洋能源产品贸易网络结构特征及社团分布研究[J]. 经济地理, 2020, 40(10):108-117.
[20] White, H C, Boorman S A, Breiger R L, Social structure from multiple networks.I.Block models of roles and positions[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1976, 81:730-779.
[21] 李敬, 陈旎, 万广华, 等. “一带一路”沿线国家货物贸易的竞争互补关系及动态变化——基于网络分析方法[J]. 管理世界, 2017(4):10-19.
[22] 廉超, 冯云, 周建梅, 等. 非洲竹区竹种类资源与产业调查[J]. 世界林业研究, 2014, 27(4):75-82.
[23] 王瑞, 段新芳, 宁攸凉, 等. 中国竹藤家具竹地板国际市场竞争力评价及建议[J]. 林产工业, 2018, 45(3):11-15.
文章导航

/