雁荡山风景名胜区旅游形象感知研究
收稿日期: 2021-02-01
修回日期: 2021-04-02
网络出版日期: 2021-06-03
基金资助
福建省科技厅引导型项目(2017Y0003)
Research on Tourism Image Perception of Yandang Mountain
Received date: 2021-02-01
Revised date: 2021-04-02
Online published: 2021-06-03
风景名胜区代表着我国生态系统保护的特色,近年来逐渐成为重要的旅游目的地之一。选取雁荡山风景名胜区作为温州自然保护地代表,深度挖掘携程网、去哪儿网、美团等共7大旅游网站游客评论,采用网络文本分析法和IPA分析法对其进行旅游形象感知研究。结果表明:1)雁荡山风景名胜区的二灵一龙景区为游客提及最多的高频词,语义网络呈“核心-次核心-外围”布局。2)游客以积极情绪为主,中性情绪和消极情绪在可控程度之内。3)基于游客感知,可将雁荡山风景名胜区旅游形象归纳为旅游资源、基础设施、娱乐项目、服务管理、文化体验、情感评价等6个项目,并细分为16个要素进行研究。4)对16个构成要素的具体评论依次进行编码分析,构建IPA模型分析得知,游客感知的各要素表现性分值较高,但重要性分值较为分散。其中,自然景观风貌、公共交通、景区管理、氛围评价为优势要素,暂无弱势要素。
林心影 , 赖鹏程 , 陈健翎 , 吴元晶 , 黄启堂 . 雁荡山风景名胜区旅游形象感知研究[J]. 林草资源研究, 2021 , 0(2) : 164 -170 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2021.02.022
Scenic spots are China's representative characteristics in ecological system protection and have gradually become one of the important tourist destinations in recent years.This paper selects the Yandang Mountain scenic spot as the representative of Wenzhou nature reserve,tries to study the tourist reviews of seven major tourism websites,including Xiecheng,Qunaer and Meituan to study their tourism image perception based on content analysis and IPA analysis methods.The results show that:(1)The Erling and Yilong scenic spots in the Yandang Mountain Scenic Area are the most frequently mentioned words by tourists with a "core-sub core-peripheral" semantic network layout.(2)Positive emotions are mainly found in the tourists,and their neutral and negative emotions are under control.(3)Based on the perception of tourists,the tourism image of Yandang Mountain Scenic Area can be summarized into six major items:tourism resources,infrastructure,entertainment projects,service management,cultural experience,and emotional evaluation which can be subdivided into 16 elements for research.(4)The specific comments of the 16 constituent elements were sequentially coded and analyzed.The IPA model analysis was constructed to find that the performance scores of each element perceived by tourists are higher,but the importance scores are more scattered.Among them,natural landscape,public transportation,scenic spot management,and atmosphere evaluation are the advantage elements,and there are no weak elements.
| [1] | 杨天娇, 聂晓嘉, 李霄鹤, 等. 基于网络文本分析的福州国家森林公园形象感知研究[J]. 河南科技学院学报:自然科学版, 2019,47(4):25-31. |
| [2] | Hunt J D. Image as a factor in tourism development[J]. Journal of Travel Research, 1975,13:1-7. |
| [3] | 张维梅, 张建新, 欧阳甜. 基于网络游记的名人故居地旅游形象影响因素研究——以韶山为例[J]. 消费经济, 2020,36(6):85-94. |
| [4] | 林玉虾, 林璧属. 基于Q方法的旅游目的地形象偏好结构[J]. 热带地理, 2019,39(2):278-287. |
| [5] | Choi S, Lehto X Y, Morrison A M. Destination image representation on the web:Content analysis of Macau travel related websites[J]. Tourism Management, 2007,28(1):118-129. |
| [6] | Ahmed Z U. The influence of the components of a state’s toursist image on product positioning statehgy[J]. Tourism management, 1991,12(4):331-340. |
| [7] | 彭夏岁. 全域旅游目的地形象“投射-感知”比较实证分析——以厦门市为例[J]. 西南师范大学学报:自然科学版, 2020,45(9):78-87. |
| [8] | 潘珠, 吴星. 基于网络文本分析的海南旅游目的地形象感知研究[J]. 中国经贸导刊(中), 2020(3):72-73. |
| [9] | 张洋, 甘萌雨, 黎宏君. 真实性、游客涉入对推荐意愿影响的路径分析——以福州三坊七巷历史文化街区为例[J]. 旅游论坛, 2017,10(2):49-62. |
| [10] | 薛敏, 陈楚文, 寿云蕾. 基于网络文本分析的乡村旅游形象感知研究——以临安太湖源镇指南村为例[J]. 农村经济与科技, 2020,31(21):109-111. |
| [11] | 刘宇飞, 李亚娟, 刘红, 等. 基于网络点评的红色旅游地形象感知研究——以井冈山为例[J]. 江西科学, 2020,38(5):748-754. |
| [12] | 李勇, 陈晓婷, 王子健. 文旅融合下的省级公共图书馆公众形象感知与质量提升[J/OL]. 图书馆论坛, (2020- 09- 15)[2021-02-01]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/44.1306.G2.20200915.1722.006.html. |
| [13] | 王文琛, 张补宏. 旅游虚拟社区中用户倦怠与消极使用行为影响因素研究——以“马蜂窝”旅游网为例[J]. 地理与地理信息科学, 2020,36(5):86-94. |
| [14] | Thomas B H. Visual Methods of Social Research[J]. Visual Anthropology, 2009,22(1):80-81 |
| [15] | Martilla J A, James J C. Importance-performace analysis[J]. Journal of Marketing, 1977,41(1):77-79. |
| [16] | 雁荡山风景名胜区总体规划(2018—2035年)[EB/OL]. (2018- 11- 08)[2021-02-01]. http://www.zjpy.gov.cn/art/2018/11/8/art_1256718_23678862.html. |
| [17] | 李军辉. 基于游客感知的民族村寨传统体育文化旅游可持续发展研究[D]. 桂林: 桂林理工大学, 2018. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |