欢迎访问林草资源研究
科学研究

牛姆林自然保护区3种栲属树种热值与碳含量研究

  • 林明春 ,
  • 尤龙辉
展开
  • 1.福建牛姆林自然保护区管理处,福建 永春 362600;
    2.福建省林业科学研究院,福州 350012
林明春(1971-),男,福建泉州人,工程师,从事森林资源经营管理工作。Email:411293812@qq.com

收稿日期: 2014-04-16

  修回日期: 2014-04-24

  网络出版日期: 2020-12-09

Study on Caloric Values and Carbon Contents of Three Species of Castanopsis in Niumulin Nature Reserve

  • LIN Mingchun ,
  • YOU Longhui
Expand
  • 1. Niumulin Nature Reserve Administrative Office,Yongchun,Fujian 362600,China;
    2. Fujian Academy of Forestry,Fuzhou 350012,China

Received date: 2014-04-16

  Revised date: 2014-04-24

  Online published: 2020-12-09

摘要

对福建永春牛姆林自然保护区内22a生的闽粤栲(Castanopsis fissa)、丝栗栲(Castanopsis fargesii)、拉氏栲(Castanopsis lamonteii)不同器官的灰分含量、去灰分热值和碳含量进行对比分析,并估算各树种人工林的碳储量和能量现存量。结果表明:3种栲属树种各器官灰分含量总体表现为叶>根>枝>干,各器官平均灰分含量则表现为拉氏栲>丝栗栲>闽粤栲;各树种各器官去灰分热值总体表现为叶>枝>干>根,各器官平均去灰分热值则表现为拉氏栲>闽粤栲>丝栗栲;各树种各器官碳含量均表现为干>枝>根>叶,各器官平均碳含量则表现为闽粤栲>丝栗栲>拉氏栲;各树种各器官间的灰分含量、去灰分热值和碳含量总体差异均达到显著水平(t检验,P<0.01);除了碳含量与去灰分热值呈极显著正相关外,其他各指标间无显著相关性;3种栲属树种人工林碳储量和能量现存量表现为为闽粤栲>丝栗栲>拉氏栲,在低产低效林分改造中可优先考虑闽粤栲。

本文引用格式

林明春 , 尤龙辉 . 牛姆林自然保护区3种栲属树种热值与碳含量研究[J]. 林草资源研究, 2014 , 0(3) : 77 -81 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2014.03.017

Abstract

Ash contents(ASC),ash free caloric values(AFCV)and carbon contents(CAC)of different organs from three species of Castanopsis in Niumulin Nature Reserve experimental region were comparatively studied and carbon stock and standing crop of energy of each tree species plantation,simultaneously,estimated.These three 22-year-old species of Castanopsis were Castanopsis fissa,Castanopsis fargesii,Castanopsis lamonteii.The results showed that ASC increased in the order of leaves,root,branch,trunk for these three species of trees,average ASC of these three species of trees increased in the order of C.lamonteii,C.fargesii,C.fissa.AFCV increased in the order of leaves,branch,trunk,root for these three species of trees,average AFCV of these three species of trees increased in the order of C.lamonteii,C.fissa,C.fargesii.CAC increased in the order of trunk,branch,root,leaves for these three species of trees,average CAC of these three species of trees increased in the order of C.fissa,C.fargesii,C.lamonteii.Difference of ASC,AFCV and CAC were significant among different organs of these three species of trees by t test(P<0.01).In addition to the fact that CAC and AFCV were extremely significant positive correlation,other indexes had no significant correlation.Carbon stock and standing crop of energy of these three species plantation increased in the order of C.lamonteii,C.fargesii,C.fissa.

参考文献

[1]官丽莉,周小勇,罗艳.我国植物热值研究综述[J].生态学杂志,2005,24(4):452-457.
[2]郑帷婕,包维楷,辜彬,等.陆生高等植物碳含量及其特点[J].生态学杂志,2007,26(3):307-313.
[3]旷远文,温达志,周国逸,等.鼎湖山季风常绿阔叶林各层次优势种热值研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2005,27(2):6-12.
[4]林益明,王湛昌,柯莉娜,等.四种灌木状与四种乔木状棕榈植物热值的月变化[J].生态学报,2003,23(6):1117-1124.
[5]向平,林益明,彭在清,等.厦门园林植物园10种榕属植物叶热值与灰分含量的研究[J].林业科学,2003,39(S):68-73.
[6]林益明,郭启荣,叶功富,等.福建东山几种木麻黄的物质与能量特征[J].生态学报,2004,24(10):2217-2224.
[7]赵敏,周广胜.中国森林生态系统的植物碳贮量及其影响因子分析[J].地理科学,2004,24(1):50-54.
[8]Detwiler R P,Hall C A.Tropical forests and the global carbon cycle[J].Science,1988,239(4835):42-47.
[9]Golley F G.Caloric value of wet tropical forest vegetation[J].Ecology,1968,50(3):517-519.
[10]林益明,林鹏,王通.几种红树植物木材热值和灰分含量的研究[J].应用生态学报,2000,12(2):181-184.
[11]陈波,杨永川,周莹,等.浙江天童常绿阔叶林内7种优势植物的热值研究[J].华东师范大学学报:自然科学版,2006(2):105-111.
文章导航

/