武汉环城林带质量评价及影响因素分析
收稿日期: 2019-10-08
修回日期: 2019-10-24
网络出版日期: 2020-05-09
基金资助
湖北省重大科技创新计划项目(2018ABA074);武汉市园林和林业局科研课题(201811)
Quality Evaluation and Analysis on Factors Affecting the Quality of the Forest Belt Around Wuhan City
Received date: 2019-10-08
Revised date: 2019-10-24
Online published: 2020-05-09
从景观质量、生长质量和稳定性上构建了环城林带质量评价的指标体系,并通过基于层次分析法和熵值法的综合权重确定了指标权重,在林带小班调查数据的基础上对武汉市环城林带质量进行评价。结果表明,基于层次分析法和熵值法的综合权重更好地平衡了评价指标的客观信息和评价者的主观意志。准则层中景观质量所占权重最高,季相多样性、树种混交状况和灌木层盖度是反映林带综合质量的关键指标。武汉市环城林带的生长质量和稳定性较高,景观质量较差,林带的质量仍具有极大的提升空间。林分密度过高、树种混交度低、季相变化不明显,林下灌草层盖度不高是影响武汉市环城林带质量的主要因素。以林带景观质量提升为重点,加强针叶林和常绿阔叶林的林分改造,提高树种混交度及灌草层盖度,增加林分的季相变化及结构完整性,合理地调整林分密度是提升林带质量的主要途径。
彭楚才 , 佃袁勇 , 周志翔 , 程维金 , 肖之炎 , 董炼 , 李新玉 . 武汉环城林带质量评价及影响因素分析[J]. 林草资源研究, 2019 , 0(6) : 75 -83 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2019.06.014
Based on the landscape quality,growth quality and stability,the indicator system of the quality evaluation of the eco-landscape forest belt around the city was constructed.The weights of the factors and indicators were determined by the comprehensive weights based on the analytic hierarchy process and the entropy method to evaluate the quality of the shelterbelt.The study results are as follows:the comprehensive weighting based on analytic hierarchy process and the entropy method better balanced the objective information of the evaluation indicators and the subjective will of the evaluators.Landscape quality has the highest weight in the criteria layer.Seasonal aspect diversity,tree mixed status and shrub layer coverage are the key indicators reflecting the comprehensive quality of the shelterbelt.Growth quality and stability of the shelterbelt is relatively high,while landscape quality is low,so the quality of the shelterbelt still has a great room for improvement.The mixed degree of tree species is not good,the seasonal variation is not obvious,and the coverage of understory shrubs is not high,which is the main factor affecting the quality of the forest belt around a city.Focusing on the quality improvement of shelterbelt landscape,improving the stand of coniferous forest and evergreen broad-leaved forest,increasing the mixed degree of tree species,the seasonal variation and structural integrity of the stand,and adjusting the stand density reasonably,promoting the growth of understory shrubs and improving the biodiversity of forest belts in the process of protection are the main ways to improve the quality of the forest belt around a city
| [1] | 张凯旋, 凌焕然, 达良俊. 上海环城林带景观美学评价及优化策略[J]. 生态学报, 2012,32(17):5521-5531. |
| [2] | 祁舒展, 姜卫兵, 魏家星. 我国环城绿带的发展:问题、对策与展望[J]. 中国城市林业, 2017,15(3):11-15. |
| [3] | Hong W Y, Guo R Z. Indicators for quantitative evaluation of the social services function of urban greenbelt systems:A case study of shenzhen,China[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2017,75:259-267. |
| [4] | 温全平, 杨辛. 环城绿带详细规划指标体系探讨——以上海市宝山区生态专项建设管理示范基地规划为例[J]. 风景园林, 2010,(1):86-92. |
| [5] | 王玮璐. 北京城市绿化林带降噪效果的四季变化研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2012. |
| [6] | 达良俊, 余倩, 蔡北溟. 城市生态廊道构建理念及关键技术[J]. 中国城市林业, 2010,8(3):11-14. |
| [7] | Yang Jun, Zhou Jinxing. The failure and success of greenbelt program in Beijing[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2007,6:287-296. |
| [8] | 杨玲. 环城绿带游憩开发及游憩规划相关内容研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2010. |
| [9] | 沈沉沉. 上海市环城绿带生态系统服务功能评价及其价值评估[D]. 上海:华东师范大学, 2011. |
| [10] | 王乾, 张德门. 贵阳市环城林带建设保护与城市生态可持续发展探讨[J]. 贵州林业科技, 2011,39(3):55-57. |
| [11] | 张卓林. 城市环城绿带的建设策略及景观策略研究——以西安环城绿带为例[J]. 西安:西安建筑科技大学, 2011. |
| [12] | 施明辉, 赵翠薇, 郭志华, 等. 森林健康评价研究进展[J]. 生态学杂志, 2010,29(12):2498-2506. |
| [13] | 马志林. 北京山区典型小流域防护林健康评价及经营模式研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2011. |
| [14] | 刘婷婷, 孔越, 吴叶, 等. 基于熵权模糊物元模型的我国省域森林生态安全研究[J]. 生态学报, 2017,7(15):4946-4955. |
| [15] | Li F Z, Lu S S, Sun Y N, et al. Integrated Evaluation and Scenario Simulation for Forest Ecological Security of Beijing Based on System Dynamics Model[J]. Sustainability, 2015,7:13631-13659. |
| [16] | 赵新泉, 马燕娥. 基于层次分析法的大兴安岭林区森林可持续经营评价[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2014,42(12):138-140. |
| [17] | 廖祥龙. 八达岭地区主要林分类型的可持续经营状况评价研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2016. |
| [18] | Paudyal R, Stein T V, Ober H K, et al. Recreationists' Perceptions of Scenic Beauty and Satisfaction at a Public Forest Managed for Endangered Wildlife[J]. Forests, 2018,9:241-254. |
| [19] | 陈勇. 深圳市城市森林美景度研究[D]. 北京:中国林业科学研究院, 2013. |
| [20] | 李悦, 袁若愚, 刘洋, 等. 基于综合权重法的青岛市湿地生态安全评价[J]. 生态学杂志, 2019,38(3):847-855. |
| [21] | 邢广君, 赵孟伟. 基于综合权重灰色关联分析法的千鹤湖生态安全评价[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2019,38(3):121-128. |
| [22] | 苏贤保, 李勋贵, 刘巨峰, 等. 基于综合权重法的西北典型区域水资源脆弱性评价研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2018,32(3):112-118. |
| [23] | Pierik M E, Acqua M D, Confalonieri R, et al. Designing ecological corridors in a fragmented landscape:A fuzzy approach to circuit connectivity analysis[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2016,67:807-820. |
| [24] | Wu G D, Duan K F, Zuo J, et al. Integrated Sustainability Assessment of Public Rental Housing Community Based on a Hybrid Method of AHP-Entropy Weight and Cloud Model[J]. Sustainability, 2017,9:603-628. |
| [25] | 王文川, 程春田, 邱林. 基于综合权重的理想模糊物元多属性决策法及应用[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2009,39(3):126-132. |
| [26] | 刘新亮, 章挺, 邱凤英, 等. 造林密度对材用樟树幼林生长和蓄积量的影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2019,39(3):23-27. |
| [27] | 杨文斌, 王晶莹, 王晓江, 等. 科尔沁沙地杨树固沙林密度、配置与林分生长过程初步研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2005,27(4):33-38. |
| [28] | 吴鞠, 陈瑜, 刘海轩, 等. 林分密度及混交度对长白山天然风景林树木形态的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2018,54(12):12-21. |
| [29] | 杨露梅, 朱明君, 鄂建, 等. 南京市地下水地源热泵系统适宜性分区评价:基于层次分析法和熵权系数法[J]. 现代地质, 2015,29(2):285-290. |
| [30] | 李悦, 袁若愚, 刘洋, 等. 基于综合权重法的青岛市湿地生态安全评价[J]. 生态学杂志, 2019,38(3):847-855. |
| [31] | Yalcin M, Gul F. A GIS-based multi criteria decision analysis approach for exploring geothermal resources:Akarcay basin(Afyonkarahisar)[J]. Geothermics, 2017,67:18-28. |
| [32] | 常二梅. 保定市环城林带群落结构与生态功能研究[D]. 保定:河北农业大学, 2009. |
| [33] | 胡婷. 基于1hm2样地的上海环城绿带群落结构特征研究[D]. 长沙:中南林业科技大学, 2017. |
| [34] | 虞未江, 贾超, 狄胜同, 等. 基于综合权重和改进物元可拓评价模型的地下水水质评价[J]. 吉林大学学报:地球科学版, 2019,49(2):539-547. |
| [35] | 彭良, 李凡修, 郭曦. 综合权重的集对分析模型在污水处理厂改造决策中的应用[J]. 环境工程学报, 2017,11(5):3327-3333. |
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |