欢迎访问林草资源研究
技术应用

基于生态足迹的浑善达克国家重点生态功能区生态承载力研究

  • 孟庆华
展开
  • 国家林业局调查规划设计院,北京 100714
孟庆华(1972-),男,山东苍山人,高工,博士,主要从事林业规划设计和景观生态学研究工作。Email:meng8045@163.com

收稿日期: 2014-01-10

  修回日期: 2014-01-20

  网络出版日期: 2020-12-09

Analysis of Ecological Carrying Capacity of National Key Ecological Function Areas in Hunshandake Based on Ecological Footprints

  • MENG Qinghua
Expand
  • Academy of Forest Inventory and Planning,SFA,Beijing 100714,China

Received date: 2014-01-10

  Revised date: 2014-01-20

  Online published: 2020-12-09

摘要

利用生态足迹分析方法,对浑善达克国家重点生态功能区2012年生态足迹进行了计算,结果表明:研究区人均生态足迹是5.296hm2,人均生态承载力为2.429hm2,生态赤字为2.867hm2,生态形势严峻。按照土地类型统计:1)人均生态足迹中化石能源地的生态足迹最大,其次为草地和耕地;2)人均生态承载力中耕地的人均生态承载力最大,其次是草地和林地;3)人均生态赤字/盈余中草地、化石能源地和水域出现生态赤字,而其他土地类型则出现生态盈余。生态保护与建设的重点是加强草地保护。

本文引用格式

孟庆华 . 基于生态足迹的浑善达克国家重点生态功能区生态承载力研究[J]. 林草资源研究, 2014 , 0(1) : 127 -130 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2014.01.024

Abstract

The ecological footprint analysis method was used to calculate the ecological footprint of the key ecological function areas in Hunshandake in 2012 and analyze their changes.The results showed that the ecological footprint was 5.296 hm2 per capita,and its ecological carrying capacity was 2.429 hm2 per capita,ecological deficit was 2.867 hm2 per capita,which reveals that this region has made full use of its various land resources.In terms of land use types:(1)Per capita ecological footprint is the largest in natural energy resources land,followed by farmland and forest land;(2)The largest ecological carrying capacity per capita is in its farmland,followed by grassland and forest land;(3)Per capita ecological deficit is found in grassland,energy resources land and waterland,while the ecological surplus appears in the other ecological land types.Key measures of ecological protection and construction in this area are to protect grassland.

参考文献

[1]William E R.Ecological footprints and appreciated carrying capacity:what urban economics leave out[J].Environ Urban,1992,4:121-130.
[2]Wackernagel M,Onisto L,Bello P,et al.Ecological Footprint of Nation [C]//Commissioned by the Earth Council for the Rio forum.Toronto:International Council for Local Environment Initiatives,1997:4-12.
[3]Wackernagel M,Lewan L,Hosson C B.Evaluating the use of national capital with the ecological footprint:Applications in Sweden and Subregions[J].AMB IO:A Journal of the Human Environment,1999,28(7):604-612.
[4]Van Vunnren D P,Smeets E M.Ecological footprintofBernin,Bhutan,Costa Rica and the Netherlands [J].Ecological economics,2000,34(1):115-130.
[5]Gossling S,et al.Ecological footprint analyses as a tool assess tourism sustainability [J].Ecological Economics,2002,43(2 /3):199-211.
[6]杨开忠,杨咏,陈洁.生态足迹分析理论与方法[J].地球科学进展,2000,15(6):630-636.
[7]张志强.生态足迹的概念及计算模型[J].生态经济,2000(10):8-10.
[8]龙爱华,张志强,苏志勇.生态足迹评介及国际研究前沿[J].地球科学进展,2004,19(6):971-981.
[9]张志强,徐中民,程国栋,等.中国西部12省(区市)的生态足迹[J].地理学报,2001,56(5):599-609.
[10]陈布景,徐中民,程国栋,等.中国西北地区的生态足迹[J].冰川冰土,2001,23(2):164-169.
[11]董泽琴,孙铁珩.生态足迹研究—辽宁省生态足迹计算与分析[J].生态学报,2004,24(12):2735-2739.
[12]胡新艳,牛宝俊,刘一明.广东省的生态足迹与可持续发展研究[J].上海环境科学,2003,22(12):926-930.
[13]刘宇辉,彭希哲.中国历年生态足迹计算与发展可持续性评估[J].生态学报,2004,24(10):2257-2262.
[14]徐中民,张志强,程国栋.甘肃省1998年生态足迹计算与分析[J].地理学报,2000,55(5):607-616.
[15]世界环境与发展委员会(WCED).我们共同的未来[M].长春:吉林人民出版社,1997.
文章导航

/