欢迎访问林草资源研究
综合管理

生态安全视域下盗伐林木犯罪防控对策研究——基于302份判决书的实证分析

  • 王智 ,
  • 刘洪广
展开
  • 1. 中国人民公安大学 犯罪学学院,北京100038
    2. 南京森林警察学院 侦查学院,南京210023
王智(1987-),男,河南焦作人,在读博士,讲师,主要从事侦查学与犯罪学方面的研究工作。Email: wangzi212121@sina.com

收稿日期: 2019-07-13

  修回日期: 2019-08-29

  网络出版日期: 2020-09-18

基金资助

教育部哲学社会科学研究后期资助项目“认知脑电对言词证据可信度评估的神经科学证据理论与实务”(16JHQ005)

Study on Countermeasures for Prevention and Control of Illegal Logging Crimes from the Perspective of Ecological Security—An Empirical Analysis Based on 302 Court Verdicts

  • Zhi WANG ,
  • Hongguang LIU
Expand
  • 1. College of Criminology,People's Public Security University of China,Beijing 100038,China
    2. College of Investigation,Nanjing Forest Police College,Nanjing 210023,China

Received date: 2019-07-13

  Revised date: 2019-08-29

  Online published: 2020-09-18

摘要

为有效遏制持续高发的盗伐林木犯罪态势和构建利于生态文明建设的防控对策,运用实证分析法对302份盗伐林木罪一审判决书进行研究,得出:犯罪主体方面以青壮年男性农民为主,初中以下学历居多;犯罪主观方面以牟利和满足生产生活需要为主;犯罪客观方面为盗伐幼树案件较少,盗伐林木平均立木蓄积“数量巨大”,但刑罚“轻刑化”现象突出。建议:从认识上转变“重经济价值轻生态价值”的林木价值观,从政策上推进林业生态扶贫工作,从立法上确立刑法生态法益,通过多维度的防控对策来保护生态安全,建设美丽中国。

本文引用格式

王智 , 刘洪广 . 生态安全视域下盗伐林木犯罪防控对策研究——基于302份判决书的实证分析[J]. 林草资源研究, 2019 , 0(5) : 28 -32 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2019.05.006

Abstract

In order to effectively curb the continuous high incidence of illegal logging crimes and build prevention and control measures conducive to the construction of ecological civilization,302 cases of illegal logging crime of first instance were studied by empirical analysis method.The main body of crime is mainly young and middle-aged male farmers,most of whom have a junior middle school education.The subjective aspect of crime is to make profits and meet the needs of production and life.The objective aspect of the crime is that there are few cases of illegal cutting of young trees,the average amount of illegal cutting of trees is "huge",but the phenomenon of " light-penalization" is prominent.It is suggested to change the forest value of "emphasizing economic value but ignoring ecological value" from the perspective of understanding,promote forestry ecological poverty alleviation from the perspective of policy,establish the ecological legal interest of criminal law from the perspective of legislation,protect ecological security through multidimensional prevention and control measures,and build a beautiful China.

参考文献

[1] Fischer J, Lindenmayer D B, Manning A D. Biodiversity,ecosystem function,and resilience:ten guiding principles for commodity production landscapes[J]. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2006,4(2):80-86.
[2] Patterson T M, Coelho D L. Ecosystem services:Foundations,opportunities,and challenges for the forest products sector[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2009,257(8):1637-1646.
[3] 张高文. 破坏森林资源犯罪案件证据调查规范[M]. 北京: 中国人民公安大学出版社, 2012.
[4] 张明楷. 刑法学(下)[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2016.
[5] 张树梓, 李梅, 张树彬, 等. 塞罕坝华北落叶松人工林天然更新影响因子[J]. 生态学报, 2015(16):5403-5411.
[6] 黄霞, 唐双娥, 董邦俊. 试析我国林木资源之刑法保护——盗伐林木罪的社会危害性之思考[J]. 现代法学, 2003(8):119-122.
[7] 张华卿. 美化法参与法平民法——论广告中常用的几种宣传方法[J]. 新闻爱好者, 2008(4):50.
[8] 沈茂英, 杨萍. 生态扶贫内涵及其运行模式研究[J]. 农业经济, 2016(7):3-8.
[9] 肖磊. 绿色发展理念下生态扶贫法治保障研究[J]. 法学杂志, 2019(5):39-47.
[10] 安柯颖. 生态刑法的基本问题[M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2014.
[11] 简基松. 论生态法益在刑法法益中的独立地位[J]. 中国刑事法杂志, 2006(5):20-24.
[12] 黄锡生, 张磊. 生态法益与我国传统刑法的现代化[J]. 河北法学, 2009(11):54-58.
[13] 郭会玲. 生态法益视角下破坏森林资源犯罪立法之完善[J]. 林业经济, 2012(8):112-115.
[14] 贝卡利亚. 论犯罪与刑罚[M].黄风,译. 北京: 中国大百科全书出版社, 1993.
文章导航

/