欢迎访问林草资源研究
综合管理

新森林法背景下环境行政公益诉讼制度检视与理性进路

  • 戴小俊 ,
  • 马蕾
展开
  • 1.南京森林警察学院,南京 210023
    2.南京理工大学,南京 210000
戴小俊(1976-),男,江苏金坛人,副教授,硕士,主要从事公安学和生态保护方面的研究。Email: 386970565@qq.com

收稿日期: 2020-07-16

  修回日期: 2020-09-08

  网络出版日期: 2020-11-30

基金资助

国家林业和草原局软科学项目(2018-R34);教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目(16YJCZH158)

Review and Rational Approach of Environmental Administrative Public Interest Litigation System under the New Forest Law

  • Xiaojun DAI ,
  • Lei MA
Expand
  • 1. Nanjing Forest Police College,Nanjing 210023,China
    2. Nanjing University of Science and Technology,Nanjing 210000,China

Received date: 2020-07-16

  Revised date: 2020-09-08

  Online published: 2020-11-30

摘要

新森林法修订与实施,将为环境行政公益诉讼制度的推动带来新契机。选择环境公益诉讼制度中的行政公益诉讼制度,从其范畴、制度构建必要性和法律实践角度进行阐述,并选取适合样本进行分析,研究发现该诉讼制度推进进程中,面临法律适用性不够、制度设计不足、司法权与行政权间的冲突等制约因素。因此,有针对性地从4个方面提出完善环境行政公益诉讼制度的路径选择:1)加强扩大诉讼主体范围、建立激励机制以及明确举证责任分配机制的配套法律法规制度供给;2)在推进诉前程序适度司法化、建立公益损害评估机制等方面进一步完善诉讼程序;3)加强司法权与行政权的界限厘清,促进法治思维培养和依法行政;4)针对“后疫情时代”野生动物保护的相关行政公益诉讼应给予拓展,切实保护和珍爱野生动物。通过对环境行政公益诉讼制度实施过程的制度检视及理性进路重点分析,以期促进对森林、野生生物资源等生态环境的保护和效果实现,并可为今后开展相关研究提供一定参考。

本文引用格式

戴小俊 , 马蕾 . 新森林法背景下环境行政公益诉讼制度检视与理性进路[J]. 林草资源研究, 2020 , 0(5) : 7 -10 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2020.05.002

Abstract

The revision and implementation of China's new forest law will bring new opportunities for the promotion of the environmental administrative public interest litigation system.This study chooses the administrative public interest litigation system of the environmental public interest litigation system,explains the necessity and legal practice of its category and system construction,and selects suitable samples for analysis.It finds that in the process of promoting the litigation system,there are many restrictive factors,such as insufficient applicability of law,inadequate system design,and conflicts between judicial power and administrative power.Therefore,this paper puts forward four ways to improve the environmental administrative public interest litigation system:First,it is expected to expand the scope of litigants,establish incentive mechanism,clarify the distribution mechanism of burden of proof and other supporting laws and regulations;second,we should further improve the litigation procedure in the aspects of promoting the appropriate judicature of pre-litigation procedure and establishing the evaluation mechanism for public welfare damage;third,we should clarify the boundary between judicial power and administrative power,and promote the cultivation of legal thinking and administration according to law;fourth,the administrative public interest litigation of wildlife protection in the postera of the COVID-19 pandemic should be expanded to protect and cherish wildlife.Through the system inspection and rational path analysis of the implementation of the environmental administrative public interest litigation system,the study aims to promote the protection of forest,wildlife and other ecological resources,as well as provide certain reference for future related research.

参考文献

[1] Gill G N. Human rights and the environment in India:access through public interest litigation[J]. Environmental Law Review, 2012,14(3):200-218.
[2] 徐素波, 王耀东, 耿晓媛. 生态补偿:理论综述与研究展望[J]. 林业经济, 2020,42(3):14-26.
[3] Kallies A, Godden L. What price democracy?:Blue Wedges and the hurdles to public interest environmental litigation[J]. Alternative Law Journal, 2008,33(4):194-199.
[4] 中华人民共和国森林法[EB/OL]. (2020-01-02)(2020-0+-12). http://www.npc.gov.cn/npc/c30834/201912/cdb75f0436604da58ddad953f6fb14c2.shtml.
[5] 曹明德. 中美环境公益诉讼比较研究[J]. 比较法研究, 2015(4):67-77.
[6] 张建伟. 论环境公益诉讼制度[J]. 河海大学学报:哲学社会科学版, 2004,6(4):24-27.
[7] 邵艳. 论森林资源环境公益诉讼制度的构建[J]. 林业经济, 2016,38(12):87-90.
[8] 国家林草局副局长刘东生解读新修订的森林法[EB/OL]. (2019-12-31)(2020-06-12). http://www.xinhuanet.com/travel/2019-12/31/c_1125403857.htm.
[9] Craig R K. Stationarity is dead:long live transformation:five principles for climate change adaptation law[J]. Harvard Environmental Law Review, 2010(34):9-74.
[10] Boyd D R. The environmental rights revolution:a global study of constitutions,human rights,and the environment[M]. London: The University of British Columbia Press, 2011.
[11] 张明华. 环境公益诉讼制度刍议[J]. 法学论坛, 2002(6):91-97.
[12] 中华人民共和国民法典[EB/OL]. (2020-06-02)(2020-06-12). http://weiquan.people.cn/n1/2020/0602/c432040-31732562.html.
[13] 杨秀清, 谢凡. 环境民事公益诉讼法律适用困境及其破解[J]. 河北法学, 2020,38(5):42-65.
[14] 孟庆瑜, 张思茵. 环境行政公益诉讼中行刑责任衔接问题研究——关于沐阳县农业委员会不履行法定职责行政公益诉讼案的探讨[J]. 法律适用, 2019(12):44-53.
[15] Yun Ma. Vindicating environmental public interests in China:A balanced approach to institutionnal interaction in public interest litigation system[J]. Environmental Law Review, 2019,21(4):269-291.
[16] 李亚菲. 检察机关提起环境行政公益诉讼的制度困境及其因应[J]. 社会科学家, 2020(2):130-134.
[17] Chamberlain L. Beyond litigation:the need for creativity in working to realise environmental rights[J]. Law Environment and Development Journal, 2017,13(1):1-12.
[18] Bina O. Environmental governance in China:weakness and potential from an environmental policy integration perspective[J]. China Review, 2010,10(1):207-239.
[19] 颜运秋. 我国环境公益诉讼的发展趋势——对新《环境保护法》实施以来209件案件的统计分析[J]. 求索, 2017(10):116-129.
[20] Cao Mingde, Wang Fengyuan. Environmental Public Interest Litigation in China[J]. Asia Pacific Law Review, 2011,19(2):207-235.
[21] 许建宝, 刘海洋. 公益诉讼筑牢生态环保法治之墙[J]. 人民论坛, 2019(23):122-123.
[22] Armitage D. Resilience and administrative law[J]. Ecology and Society, 2013,18(2):2-14.
[23] 王秀卫. 我国环境民事公益诉讼举证责任分配的反思与重构[J]. 法学评论, 2019(2):169-176.
[24] 王春业. 论行政公益诉讼诉前程序的改革——以适度司法化为导向[J]. 当代法学, 2020(1):89-97.
[25] 郭明, 冯朝阳, 赵善伦. 生态环境价值评估方法综述[J]. 山东师范大学学报:自然科学版, 2003,18(1):71-73.
[26] 薄晓波. 环境民事公益诉讼救济客体之厘清[J]. 中国地质大学学报:社会科学版, 2019,19(3):29-41.
[27] 赵锦锦, 刘丹. 浅谈野生动物保护相关法律问题[J]. 法制与社会, 2020(12):41-42.
[28] 章元珍, 朱笛琴. 从野生动物保护谈重大疫情防控的源头治理[J]. 中国检察官, 2020(8):58-61.
[29] Dwivedi R. Environmental Movements in the Global South:Issues of Livelihood and Beyond[J]. International Sociology, 2001(16):11-31.
[30] Ramesh J. Governance for ecological security[J]. India International Centre Quarterly, 2010,37(1):2-11.
文章导航

/