欢迎访问林草资源研究
科学研究

波密岗乡自然保护区华山松种群结构与数量动态特征

  • 姚慧芳 ,
  • 卢杰 ,
  • 王超 ,
  • 陈康
展开
  • 1.西藏农牧学院高原生态研究所,西藏 林芝 860000
    2.西藏高原森林生态教育部重点实验室,西藏 林芝 860000
    3.西藏林芝高山森林生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站,西藏 林芝 860000
姚慧芳(1997-),女,内蒙古乌兰察布人,在读硕士,主要从事森林生态学方面的研究工作。

收稿日期: 2020-08-11

  修回日期: 2020-10-16

  网络出版日期: 2020-11-30

基金资助

科技部国家野外科学研究观测站(生态系统)运行补助项目“西藏林芝高山森林生态系统国家野外科学观测研究”(2015-2020);研究生创新项目“藏东南华山松林优势植物空间格局及其关联性研究”(YJS2020-29)

Population Structure and Quantitative Dynamics of Pinus armandii in Bomi Gang Township Nature Reserve

  • Huifang YAO ,
  • Jie LU ,
  • Chao WANG ,
  • Kang CHEN
Expand
  • 1. Institute of Tibet Plateau Ecology,Tibet Agriculture & Animal Husbandry University,Nyingchi,Tibet 860000,China
    2. Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology in Tibet Plateau(Tibet Agriculture & Animal Husbandry University),Ministry of Education,Nyingchi,Tibet 860000,China
    3. Linzhi National Forest Ecosystem Observation & Research Station of Tibet,Nyingchi,Tibet 860000,China

Received date: 2020-08-11

  Revised date: 2020-10-16

  Online published: 2020-11-30

摘要

以藏东南波密岗乡自然保护区内华山松种群为研究对象,基于野外实地调查数据,依据空间代替时间理论、将种群动态变化情况进行量化。编制静态生命表、绘制存活曲线和进行生存分析来研究种群的结构特征和生存现状,通过时间序列分析来探索种群未来的发展趋势。结果表明:1)岗乡华山松种群结构属于增长型,但增长的幅度并不大,种群在发展过程中具有一定的波动性,幼苗幼树的数量极其丰富,但在向小树发展的过程中受到阻碍,个体大量死亡,更新能力受阻,种群存在衰退风险。2)岗乡华山松种群的存活曲线属于Deevey-Ⅲ型,早期死亡率极高,到一定阶段死亡率下降,发展平稳;种群的死亡率和消失率均在第 Ⅱ 龄级出现高峰,在 Ⅷ—Ⅸ 龄级较稳定。3)随着龄级的增加,岗乡华山松种群的生存率在下降,而累积死亡率趋于上升,分别在第 Ⅵ 龄级后达到最小值(0)和最大值(1);危险率在第Ⅱ龄级达到最高(0.394),死亡密度在第 Ⅲ—Ⅹ龄级降至最低(0),整个龄级阶段,生存率均低于危险率,说明该种群存在衰退的风险。4)对岗乡华山松种群的时间序列分析表明,在经历未来 Ⅱ、Ⅳ、Ⅵ 和 Ⅷ 龄级时间后,中、大树阶段的个体数量有上升的趋势。研究认为,岗乡华山松种群具有前期锐减、中期稳定和后期衰退的特点,建议采取就地保护的措施加强对岗乡华山松种群的保护,使其可持续发展。

本文引用格式

姚慧芳 , 卢杰 , 王超 , 陈康 . 波密岗乡自然保护区华山松种群结构与数量动态特征[J]. 林草资源研究, 2020 , 0(5) : 108 -115 . DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2020.05.016

Abstract

Taking Pinus armandii population in Bomi Gang Township Nature Reserve of Southeast Tibet as the research object,this paper quantifies dynamic changes of population according to the theory of space in replacement of time,based on field survey data.It compiles the static life table,draws the survival curve and carries on the survival analysis to study the characteristics of population structure and its present survival situation. Through time series analysis,this article explores the trend of population development in the future.The results showed that:1) the population structure of P.armandii in Gangxiang belonged to the growth type,but the growth rate was not large.The population has a certain fluctuation in the process of development,and the number of seedlings and saplings is extremely large,but it was hindered in the process of developing into small trees,with a large number of individual death. The regeneration ability was hindered,and the population was at risk of decline.2) The survival curve of P.armandii population in Gangxiang belonged to Deevey-Ⅰ type,the early mortality rate was very high,and the mortality rate decreased to a certain stage and maintained stable development. The mortality and disappearance rate of the population appeared peak in the Ⅱ age class,and were stable in the Ⅷ—Ⅸ age class.3) With the increase of age class,the survival rate of P.armandii population in Gangxiang decreased,and the cumulative mortality increased,reaching the minimum value of 0 and the maximum value of 1 after the Ⅵ age class. The risk rate reached the highest (0.394) in the Ⅱ age class,and the death density decreased to the lowest (0) in the Ⅲ—Ⅹ age class. In the whole age class stage,the survival rate was lower than the risk rate,which indicates that the population is at risk of decline.4) The time series analysis of P.armandii population in Gangxiang showed that the number of individuals in middle and big tree stage would increase after Ⅱ、Ⅳ、Ⅵ and Ⅷ age classes.The results showed that the population of P.armandii in Gangxiang experienced a sharp decrease in the early stage,maintained stable in the middle stage and declined in the later stage.Therefore,local protection measures should be taken to strengthen the protection of P.armandii population in Gangxiang for its sustainable development.

参考文献

[1] 王进, 姚兰, 艾训儒, 等. 鄂西南不同区域亮叶桦种群结构与动态特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020,31(2):357-365.
[2] 何斌, 李青, 陈群利, 等. 黔西北岩溶区华山松(Pinus armandii)种群结构及动态特征[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2020,36(6):788-795.
[3] 肖书礼, 付梦媛, 杨科, 等. 极小种群野生植物峨眉含笑的种群结构与数量动态[J]. 西北植物学报, 2019,39(7):1279-1288.
[4] 姜明成, 翟思万, 陈波涛. 华山松种子园盛果期优良无性系球花产量调查研究[J]. 种子, 2019,38(4):97-100.
[5] 张桢, 李春艳, 郑永唐, 等. 华山松松塔体外抗HIV活性的研究[J]. 时珍国医国药, 2014,25(1):25-26.
[6] Peng Jianfeng, Li Jinbao, Wang Ting, et al. Effect of altitude on climate-growth relationships of Chinese white pine (Pinus armandii) in the northern Funiu Mountain,central China[J]. Climatic Change, 2019,154(1/2):273-288.
[7] 张清友. 华山松造林技术及抚育管理初探[J]. 南方农业, 2018,12(5):46-47.
[8] 查玉平, 张子一, 陈京元, 等. 华山松大小蠹对LED灯的趋光行为[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2019,56(6):1396-1401.
[9] 王媛媛, 余佳敏, 代鲁鲁, 等. 华山松大小蠹2个甲羟戊酸路径基因的克隆与表达[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2020,35(1):140-149.
[10] 杨媛媛, 陈奇伯, 黎建强. 滇中地区华山松天然次生林与人工林群落特征比较[J]. 西南农业学报, 2018,31(1):200-206.
[11] 袁丽萍. 云南云龙天池自然保护区华山松天然林生物量研究[J]. 防护林科技, 2018(8):13-15.
[12] 吴桂康, 吴贤明, 张芳, 等. 西昌市大箐梁子华山松球蚜生物生态学特性研究[J]. 四川林业科技, 2019,40(5):56-59.
[13] 来雨晴, 王美仙, 解莹然, 等. 华山松冬季挥发物检测分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2016,28(2):284-290.
[14] 张维平, 陈志辉, 谢寿安, 等. 华山松大小蠹对非寄主挥发物的触角电位和行为反应[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2015,30(4):147-152.
[15] 魏丽萍, 呼杰, 邓公甫, 等. 西藏华山松籽仁脂肪酸及微量元素测定[J]. 食品工业, 2018,39(9):309-312.
[16] 卢杰, 李江荣, 郭其强, 等. 藏东南林芝云杉种群结构与数量动态[J]. 林业资源管理, 2014(4):67-73.
[17] 卢杰, 郭其强, 郑维列, 等. 藏东南高山松种群结构及动态特征[J]. 林业科学, 2013,49(8):154-160.
[18] 舒琪, 胡璇, 徐瑞晶, 等. 海南岛甘什岭青梅种群结构与动态[J]. 林业科学, 2020,56(5):160-167.
[19] Deevey Edwand S J R. Life tables for natural populations of animals[J]. Quarterly Review of Biology, 1947,22(4):283-314.
[20] Hett J M, Loucks O L. Age structure models of Balsam fir and Eastern hemlock[J]. Journal of Ecology, 1976,64(3):1029-1044.
[21] 金慧, 赵莹, 刘丽杰, 等. 长白山区濒危植物朝鲜崖柏种群数量特征及动态[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019,30(5):1563-1570.
[22] 杨小林, 王秋菊, 兰小中, 等. 濒危植物大花黄牡丹(Paeonia ludlowii)种群数量动态[J]. 生态学报, 2007(3):1242-1247.
[23] 覃弦, 龙翠玲. 茂兰喀斯特森林不同演替阶段优势乔木种群结构及数量动态[J]. 林业资源管理, 2016(6):57-63.
[24] 张文辉, 祖元刚, 刘国彬. 十种濒危植物的种群生态学特征及致危因素分析[J]. 生态学报, 2002(9):1512-1520.
文章导航

/