Dynamic Effects of Root Pruning on Growth and Root Morphology in P.elliottii×P.caribaea Cuttings

doi:10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2019.03.020

Abstract

Abstract:

The container grown cuttings of P.elliottii×P.caribaea were cultured with air root pruning(RP) or without(control).The height of the raised bed were 30 cm,50 cm and 70 cm for the RP cuttings,respectively.The parameters including height,ground diameter,shoot biomass,root biomass,root length,root surface area,root diameter and fine root ratio,were monitored monthly within half a year.Although the root morphology was affected,no significant effects were found on cutting growth and biomass by root pruning.The root length was significantly increased in the RP cuttings at 70 cm-height bed 4 months after treatment.However,the root system of the RP cuttings changed from elongation to diameter growth.The fine root ratio decreased,and the root diameter increased compared to the control.The correlation between the growth and root diameter increased gradually,whereas the correlation between the growth and root length tended to decrease.It was implied that the changes in root morphology in RP cuttings would benefit the cutting growth.It is recommendes to use 70 cm-height bed for air root pruning for P.elliottii×P.caribaea cuttings.

Key words: P.elliottii×P.caribaea, air root pruning, ground diameter, container grown cuttings, adventitious roots

CLC Number:

S723.1

LIN Changming, PENG Guanming, HUANG Zengyue, HUANG Ting, SITU Wendou, LI Zhen, GUO Wenbing, ZHAO Fencheng. Dynamic Effects of Root Pruning on Growth and Root Morphology in P.elliottii×P.caribaea Cuttings[J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2019, 0(3): 118-123.

Figures/Tables 6

Tab.1

Fig.1

Tab.1

Fig.2

Tab.3

Tab.4

References 16

[1]	Dieters M, Brawner J. Productivity of Pinus elliottii,P.caribaea and their F₁ and F₂ hybrids to 15 years in Queensland,Australia[J]. Annals of Forest Science, 2007,64(7):691-698.
[2]	黄永权, 赵奋成. 广东湿加松良种选育现状及发展对策[J]. 福建林业科技, 2007,34(1):158-162.
[3]	张鹏, 杨玲, 丛健, 等. 论森林培育技术的精准化[J]. 世界林业研究, 2008,21(1):34-39.
[4]	赵梦炯, 姜成英, 吴文俊, 等. Cu,Zn制剂对油橄榄容器苗生长和根系的影响[J]. 林业科学研究, 2017,30(4):693-699.
[5]	孙盛, 彭祚登, 董凤祥, et al. Cu,Zn等制剂对银杏容器苗的控根效果[J]. 林业科学, 2009,45(7):156-160.
[6]	陈一群, 丘佐旺, 汪迎利, 等. 樟树组培苗轻基质育苗技术研究[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2015,44(2):140-145.
[7]	Dumroese R K, Sung S J S, Pinto J R, et al. Morphology,gas exchange,and chlorophyll content of longleaf pine seedlings in response to rooting volume,copper root pruning,and nitrogen supply in a container nursery[J]. New Forests, 2013,44(6):881-897.
[8]	Sayer M A S, Sung S J S, Haywood J D. Longleaf pine root system development and seedling quality in response to copper root pruning and cavity size[J]. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, 2011,35(1):5-11.
[9]	Sung S J S, Haywood D. Air lateral root pruning affects longleaf pine seedling root system morphology[C]// Proceedings of the 18th biennial southern silvicultural research conference.North Carolina:US Department of Agriculture,Forest Service,Southern Research Station, 2016(S2):317-322.
[10]	王海林, 李义成, 杨秀慧. 落叶松切根苗对造林成活率的影响[J]. 河北林业科技, 2008(5):11.
[11]	LY/T -2010,湿加松良种扦插繁殖技术规程[S].
[12]	李国雷, 刘勇, 祝燕. 苗木切根技术研究进展[J]. 林业科学, 2011,47(9):140-147.
[13]	Puhe J. Growth and development of the root system of Norway spruce(Picea abies) in forest stands—a review[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2003,175(1-3):253-273.
[14]	Fernández M, Tejero J R, Pérez I, et al. Effect of copper coating nursery containers on plant growth and root morphology of Eucalyptus globulus Labill.cuttings and seedlings[J]. Silva Lusitana, 2007,15(2):215-227.
[15]	Bellini C, Pacurar D I, Perrone I. Adventitious roots and lateral roots:similarities and differences[J]. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2014,65:639-666.
[16]	Lynch J. Root architecture and plant productivity[J]. Plant Physiology, 1995,109(1):7.

指标	1M	2M	3M	4M	5M	6M
地径(D)	0.944	0.556	0.764	0.398	0.177	0.303
株高(H)	0.445	0.870	0.441	0.616	0.488	0.794
地上部鲜重(SFW)	0.354	0.381	0.586	0.342	0.280	0.987
根鲜重(RFW)	0.874	0.949	0.203	0.137	0.913	0.444
地上部干重(SDW)	0.289	0.432	0.735	0.427	0.226	0.944
根干重(RDW)	0.717	0.432	0.241	0.075	0.200	0.793

指标	1M	2M	3M	4M	5M	6M
根冠比(R/S)	0.999	0.365	0.052	0.061	0.636	0.481
总根长(RL)	0.826	0.996	0.917	0.026	0.212	0.140
根表面积(RSA)	0.819	0.920	0.637	0.110	0.793	0.106
根平均直径(RD)	0.856	0.323	0.772	0.729	0.029	0.152
细根长(FRL)	0.803	0.979	0.979	0.008	0.095	0.235
细根比例(FRR)	0.879	0.124	0.255	0.370	0.046	0.197

	地径	株高	根鲜重	地上部鲜重	地上部干重	根干重	根冠比	总根长	根表面积	根直径	细根长
株高	0.525^*
根鲜重	0.571^*	0.456^*
地上部鲜重	0.696^*	0.636^*	0.587^*
地上部干重	0.703^*	0.629^*	0.560^*	0.956^*
根干重	0.578^*	0.432^*	0.920^*	0.599^*	0.598^*
根冠比	0.208^*	0.049	0.673^*	0.031	-0.010	0.735^*
总根长	0.382^*	0.269^*	0.718^*	0.351^*	0.334^*	0.588^*	0.499^*
根表面积	0.508^*	0.373^*	0.899^*	0.475^*	0.447^*	0.797^*	0.639^*	0.926^*
根直径	0.454^*	0.339^*	0.621^*	0.403^*	0.377^*	0.660^*	0.476^*	0.038	0.388^*
细根长	0.289^*	0.208^*	0.595^*	0.269^*	0.258^*	0.460^*	0.407^*	0.977^*	0.834^*	-0.140^*
细根比例	-0.354^*	-0.203^*	-0.362^*	-0.267^*	-0.253^*	-0.415^*	-0.305^*	0.112^*	-0.190^*	-0.858^*	0.300^*

批次	地径与根系形态				株高与根系形态
批次	根表面积	根直径	总根长	细根比例	根表面积	根直径	总根长	细根比例
1M	0.519^*	0.135	0.475^*	0.007	0.335^*	0.116	0.304^*	0.042
2M	0.364^*	0.247^*	0.288^*	-0.202^*	0.202^*	0.264^*	0.137	-0.187^*
3M	0.492^*	0.300^*	0.384^*	-0.065	0.208^*	0.325^*	0.090	-0.171
4M	0.538^*	0.313^*	0.430^*	-0.189^*	0.391^*	0.256^*	0.304^*	-0.116
5M	0.348^*	0.419^*	0.195^*	-0.308^*	0.212^*	0.276^*	0.109	-0.228^*
6M	0.448^*	0.444^*	0.261^*	-0.317^*	0.372^*	0.423^*	0.173	-0.308^*