Evaluation on Forest Park Landscape Resources Based on AHP-LCJ

FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT ›› 2009, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (5): 99-104.

• Science and Technology • Previous Articles Next Articles

Evaluation on Forest Park Landscape Resources Based on AHP-LCJ

CHEN Chuwen¹, BAO Qinxing², FENG Juhao³

1. School of Landscape Architecture,Zhejiang Forestry University,Lin'an,311300;
2. School of Landscape Architecture,Beijing Forestry University,Beijing,100083;
3. Zhuji Tourism Bureau,Zhuji 311800 Zhejiang Province,China

Received:2009-04-20 Revised:2009-09-17 Online:2009-10-28 Published:2020-12-18

Abstract

Abstract: The AHP-LCJ method was used to recognize both the public and the professionals as the main appraisal body. A multi-level appraisal was conducted for the quality of the forest park scenery resources in Wuxie country forest park. The results show that in the whole forest park and scenic appraisal,the public has obtained the high consistency with the professionals. As for scenic spot appraisal,there is a high similarity but with a considerable difference. According to the analysis on the main reason of the difference,forest park's scenery resource appraisal should use the AHP-LCJ and at the same time,consider the public's tourism demand.

Key words: Analytic Hierarchy Process, Law of Comparative Judgement, landscape resources evaluation, structure model of evaluation, weight of evaluation indicator, forestry park

CLC Number:

S759.91
P964

CHEN Chuwen, BAO Qinxing, FENG Juhao. Evaluation on Forest Park Landscape Resources Based on AHP-LCJ[J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2009, 0(5): 99-104.

References

[1]欧阳勋志,廖为明,彭世揆.论森林风景资源质量评价与管理[J].江西农业大学学报,2004,26(2):169-173.
[2]Hull IV R B. Measurement of scenic beauty: the law of comparative judgement and scienic beauty estimation procedures[J]. Forest Science,1984,30(4):1084-1096.
[3]陈鑫峰,王雁.国内外森林景观的定量评价和经营技术研究现状[J].世界林业研究,2000,13(5):31-38.
[4]王云才,王书华.景观旅游规划设计核心三力要素的综合评价[J].同济大学学报:自然科学版,2007,35(12):1724-1728.
[5]Hull IV R B,Buhyoff G J. The scenic beauty temporal distribution method: An attempt tomake scenic beauty assessment compatible with forest planning efforts[J]. Forest Science,1986,32(2):271-286.
[6]Buhyoff G J,Leuschner W A,Arndt L K. Replication of a scenic preference function[J]. Forest Science,1980,26(2):227-230.
[7]刘勇,韩泰凡,曲新谱,等.基于层次分析法的绵山旅游资源评价与可持续发展对策[J].经济地理,2006,26(02):346-348.
[8]Hull IV R B,Buhyoff G J,Gordell H K. Psychophysical models: an example with scenic beauty perceptions of roodside pine forests[J]. Landscape Journal,1987,6(2):113-122.
[9]Buhyoff G J,Leuschner W A. Estimation psychological disutility from damaged forest stands[J]. Forest Science,1978,24(1):424-432.
[10]GB/T 18005-1999,中国国家森林公园风景资源质量等级评定标准[S].
[11]Buhyoff G J,Gautheir L J,Wellman J D. Predicting scenic quality for urban forests using vegetation measurement[J]. Forest Science,1984,30(2):71-82.
[12]Tips W E J,Savasdisar T. The influence of the environmental background of subjects on their landscape preference evaluation[J]. Langdscape and Urban Planning,1986,13(1):125-133.
[13]俞孔坚. 自然风景景观评价方法[J].中国园林,1986,2(3):38-40.

Evaluation on Forest Park Landscape Resources Based on AHP-LCJ

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 9

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	Zhipeng XIAO, Polang LIU, Ye LIU, Fangwen HU, Huaizhen PENG, Ziyan ZHANG, Ping GAO. Evaluation and Selection of Potential Scenic View-point Distribution Areas Based on GIS and Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process —An Example from Jiulangshan Mountain Park in Zhuzhou [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2020, 0(1): 158-165.
[2]	PENG Chucai, DIAN Yuanyong, ZHOU Zhixiang, CHENG Weijin, XIAO Zhiyan, DONG Lian, LI Xinyu. Quality Evaluation and Analysis on Factors Affecting the Quality of the Forest Belt Around Wuhan City [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2019, 0(6): 75-83.
[3]	MENG Meng, MA Jianzhang, JI Jianwei, ZHOU Xiaorui, HU Xinxin. Comprehensive Evaluation and Analysis of Chinese Wildlife Hometown Operation [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2019, 0(3): 30-35.
[4]	SUN Yu, LI Jiping, CAO Xiaoyu, XU Zhanyong. Comprehensive Evaluation of Soil Fertility of Cunninghamia lanceolata Ecological Public Welfare Forests in Different Age Groups [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2019, 0(1): 57-62.
[5]	LI Shu, ZHANG Wei, LUO Hongyan, WANG Yalei, LAN Siren, CAO Guangqiu. Comprehensive Benefit Evaluation of Undergrowth Plant Allocation Model in Moderately Eroded Areas [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2018, 0(2): 111-118.
[6]	PAN Yangliu, ZENG Jin, WEN Ye, YAN Qi, LIU Yuanqiu. Study on the Suitability Evaluation Index System of Forest Wellness Base Construction [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2017, 0(5): 101-107.
[7]	FENG Lili, JIA Zhiqing, LI Qingxue, HE Lingxianzi, YANG Kaiyue. The Selection of the Most Suitable Shelter Forest Types for Alpine Sandy Land [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2017, 0(5): 45-51.
[8]	LIU Shaohai, ZHAO Tianzhong, LI Saibo. Application of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets in Evaluating the Forest Fire Prevention Service with TOPSIS Method [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2017, 0(3): 62-68.
[9]	WANG Ni, PENG Shikui. Evaluation on Ecological Service Functions of Nanjing Urban Forest Based on 3S Technology and AHP Method [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2011, 0(6): 98-103.