Evaluation and Selection of Potential Scenic View-point Distribution Areas Based on GIS and Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process —An Example from Jiulangshan Mountain Park in Zhuzhou

doi:10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2020.01.020

Abstract

Abstract:

This paper aims to realize the targeted investigation of distribution area of potential scenic view-point in landscape planning,and a new quantitative evaluate and screen method is proposed.By using GIS and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process,the evaluation system of distribution area of potential scenic view-point was established,and the screening threshold value was provided by local investigation,and the case test was carried out in Jiulangshan mountain park.An evaluation system of Suitability of distribution of scenic view-point,including the suitability of distance between view-point and scene,suitability of view-able area size,residence suitability and traffic accessibility is constructed.The result shows that :after expert consultation and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process analysis,the importance degrees of suitability of distance between view-point and scene,suitability of view-able area size,residence suitability and the traffic accessibility are 0.331,0.323,0.161 and 0.185.Based on GIS and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process,the suitability evaluating of the distribution of scenic view-point in Jiulangshan mountain park was completed,and result shows that the evaluate value ranging from 0.02 to 0.74.According to the local investigation results,a total of 16 suitable view-point were identified.According to the value of the 16 scenic view-point in the previous evaluation,the minimum value,the first quartile,the mean value and the median value is 0.40,0.43,0.48±0.06,0.50.When the screening thresholds were set as 0.4,0.43,0.48 and 0.50,respectively,the distribution area of potential scenic view-point accounts for 16.9%,8.9%,3.6% and 2.3% of the total research area.The screening results were tested,and 80.0% of the points were within the appropriate range obtained by screening.The evaluating and screening of distribution area of potential scenic view-point are basically realized.

Key words: distribution area of scenic view-point, evaluating and screening, GIS, fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, Jiulangshan

CLC Number:

Zhipeng XIAO, Polang LIU, Ye LIU, Fangwen HU, Huaizhen PENG, Ziyan ZHANG, Ping GAO. Evaluation and Selection of Potential Scenic View-point Distribution Areas Based on GIS and Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process —An Example from Jiulangshan Mountain Park in Zhuzhou[J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2020, 0(1): 158-165.

Figures/Tables 6

Tab.1

Tab.2

Tab.3

Fig.1

Tab.4

Fig.2

References 19

[1]	潘峰, 唐晓岚, 吴雷 , 等. 基于RS & GIS的内湖岛屿湖域视景资源开发分析[J]. 水土保持通报, 2017,37(3):279-283.
[2]	严军, 查玚晟, 梁慧琳 . 基于山形特征的山地公园景观空间选址研究[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2015,32(6):927-932. doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.06.016
[3]	Mosadeghi R, Warnken J, Tomlinson R , et al. Comparison of Fuzzy-AHP and AHP in a spatial multi-criteria decision making model for urban land-use planning[J]. Computers,Environment and Urban Systems, 2015,49:54-65. doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2014.10.001
[4]	缪叶旻子, 吴全聪, 李晓丽 , 等. 基于改进模糊层次分析法的茶园土壤肥力评价[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2019,49(10):80-87.
[5]	朱庆, 陈凯峥, 谢潇 , 等. 模糊层次分析与三维GIS集成的升压站选址方法[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2019,54(5):980-988.
[6]	刘海燕, 庞小平 . 利用GIS和模糊层次分析法的南极考察站选址研究[J]. 武汉大学学报:信息科学版, 2015,40(2):249-252.
[7]	Manoochehr M C, Akbar G . The use of fuzzy logic spatial modeling via GIS for landfill site selection(case study:Rudbar-Iran)[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2019,78(10):1-16. doi: 10.1007/s12665-018-7995-0
[8]	张强, 潘辉, 王燕玲 , 等. 基于GIS的城市山地公园视觉景观评价技术及实证[J]. 林业资源管理, 2016(4):128-133.
[9]	裘亦书, 高峻, 詹起林 . 山地视觉景观的GIS评价——以广东南昆山国家森林公园为例[J]. 生态学报, 2011,31(4):1009-1020.
[10]	吴榛, 王浩, 范榕 . 紫金山国家森林公园景观视觉评价[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2017,32(3):277-283.
[11]	聂康才, 严苗, 周学红 . 基于景观敏感度和用地适宜性评价的景区分级保护规划[J]. 规划师, 2015,31(2):133-137.
[12]	林鹏 . 基于GIS技术的山岳型风景区亭的设计研究[D]. 郑州:河南农业大学, 2015.
[13]	谭人华, 王艳慧, 关鸿亮 . 基于GIS与模糊层次分析法的景观视觉资源综合评价[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2019,21(5):663-674. doi: 10.12082/dqxxkx.2019.180640
[14]	周锐, 李月辉, 胡远满 , 等. 基于景观敏感度的森林公园景点评价[J]. 应用生态学报, 2008(11):2460-2466.
[15]	俞孔坚 . 景观敏感度与阀值评价研究[J]. 地理研究, 1991,10(2):38-51.
[16]	诺曼·K.布思 . 风景园林设计要素(修订本)[M]. 北京: 北京科学技术出版社, 2015.
[17]	徐泽水 . 基于FOWA算子的三角模糊数互补判断矩阵排序法[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2003(10):86-89.
[18]	GB/T 18005-1999,中国森林公园风景资源质量等级评定[S].
[19]	李俊英, 胡远满, 闫红伟 , 等. 基于景观视觉敏感度的棋盘山生态旅游适宜性评价[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2010,25(5):194-198.

景物类别	性质
远距离观赏景物	对象在全区域多数地区可通视,是统摄性的,或本底性质的景物。如突出周边环境且高大的山峦,通常适合在远距离观赏,近距离上难以取得最佳效果。
中距离观赏景物	局部区域可见,其他区域不可见,并在可见区起统摄作用与视线焦点作用的景物。如具有观赏价值的建筑群体,一定面积的水库、池塘,常在中等距离观赏取得最佳效果,或在中等距离观赏取得最佳效果,且有时在近距离取得与中等距离相近效果,而在较远距离上效果较中、近距离差。

三角模糊数	视距适宜性	视域开阔性	驻留适宜性	交通可达性
视距适宜性	(0.5,0.5,0.5)	(0.4,0.5,0.6)	(0.7,0.8,0.9)	(0.6,0.7,0.9)
视域开阔性	(0.4,0.5,0.6)	(0.5,0.5,0.5)	(0.7,0.8,0.9)	(0.6,0.7,0.8)
驻留适宜性	(0.1,0.2,0.3)	(0.1,0.2,0.3)	(0.5,0.5,0.5)	(0.4,0.5,0.6)
交通可达性	(0.1,0.3,0.4)	(0.2,0.3,0.4)	(0.6,0.5,0.4)	(0.5,0.5,0.5)

指标	视距适宜性	视域开阔性	驻留适宜性	交通可达性
优先程度	(0.915,1.03,1.145)	(0.89,1.03,1.07)	(0.33,0.5,0.67)	(0.42,0.55,0.78)
优先程度期望值	1.03	1.005	0.5	0.575
排序向量	0.331	0.323	0.161	0.185

观景点	评价值	观景点	评价值	观景点	评价值	观景点	评价值
A1	0.5	A5	0.41	A9	0.51	A13	0.56
A2	0.44	A6	0.4	A10	0.41	A14	0.55
A3	0.5	A7	0.51	A11	0.45	A15	0.52
A4	0.4	A8	0.54	A12	0.52	A16	0.46