The Wetlands Compensation System in USA and Its Inspiration

Abstract

Abstract: There are three distinct mechanisms to compensate unavoidable wetland impacts in USA to satisfy the requirements of rules in order to reach the government’s wetlands “no net loss” goal.Permittee-responsible mitigation,mitigation banking and in-lieu fee mitigation are the three mechanisms.Federal regulations in USA establish a flexible preference for using credits from a mitigation bank over the other compensation mechanisms,which are growing fast in the past 30 years.The wetlands compensation system in USA can give our country great reference for wetland protection,which includes the idea of compensation,using market instrument for protection of wetlands and effective government management mechanism.

Key words: wetland, compensation mechanism, wetland mitigation bank, in-lieu fee mitigation

CLC Number:

SHAO Chenxia. The Wetlands Compensation System in USA and Its Inspiration[J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2011, 0(2): 107-112.

References

[1]33 U.S.C.§1344,The Clean Water Act[S].1972.
[2]40 C.F.R.§ 230.75(d),Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines[S]. 1980.
[3]II.C,Memorandum of Agreement Between the Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of the Army Concerning the Determination of Mitigation Under the Clean Water Act Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines[S].1990.
[4]60 F.R.No.228,Federal Guidance for the Establishment,Use and Operation of Mitigation Banks[S].1995.
[5]65 F.R.No.216,Federal Guidance on the Use of In-Lieu Fee Arrangements for Compensatory Mitigation Under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act[S]. 2000.
[6]33 C.F.R.§ 332,Compensatory Mitigation for Losses of Aquatic Resources[S]. 2008.
[7]Kenny A.Environmentalists Sound Off on EPA Wetland Regulations[EB/OL].(2008-04-27)[2010-11-20].http://www.ecosystemmarketplace.com/pages/dynamic/article.page.php?page_id=5792&section=home.
[8]33 C.F.R.§ 332.8,Compensatory Mitigation for Losses of Aquatic Resources[S]. 2008.
[9]Environmental Law Institute Research Staff.Banks and Fees:The Status of Off-Site Wetland Mitigation in the United States[M]. Washington,D.C.: Environmental Law Institute,2002:61.
[10]Bendor T,Brozovic N.The social impacts of wetland mitigation policies in the United States[J].Journal of Planning Literature,2008,22(4):341-357.
[11]33 C.F.R.§ 332.3(a),Compensatory Mitigation for Losses of Aquatic Resources[S]. 2008.
[12]Wilkinson J,Thompson J.2005 Status Report on Compensatory Mitigation in the United States[R].Washington,D.C.:Environmental Law Institute,2006:27.
[13]33 C.F.R.§ 332.3(a),Compensatory Mitigation for Losses of Aquatic Resources[S]. 2008.
[14]Environmental Law Institute Research Staff.The Status and Character of In-Lieu Fee Mitigation in the United States[M]. Washington,D.C.:Environmental Law Institute,2006:61.
[15]33 C.F.R.§ 332.3(b),Compensatory Mitigation for Losses of Aquatic Resources[S]. 2008.
[16]Reiss C K,Hernandez E,Brown T M.An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Mitigation Banking in Florida:Ecological Success and Compliance with Permit Criteria[R]. Florida Department of Environmental Protection,2007:116.
[17]Booth E T.Compensatory mitigation:what is the best approach? [J].University of Baltimore Journal of Environmental Law,2004,11(2):205-222.
[18]朱建国,王曦.中国湿地保护立法研究[M]. 北京:法律出版社,2004:156.