Comparison Among Three Assets Evaluation Methods on Eucalyptus Forest

欢迎访问林业资源管理

FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT ›› 2007, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (6): 58-60.

Previous Articles Next Articles

Comparison Among Three Assets Evaluation Methods on Eucalyptus Forest

WEN Yingqian

Zhanjiang South Forestry Engineering Supervision & Administration Corp. Ltd, Zhanjiang 524022, Guangdong Province, China

Received:2007-06-06 Revised:2007-08-30 Published:2020-12-10

Abstract

Abstract: The article introduces three assets evaluation methods on Eucalyptus forest: replacement cost method, present earning value method and market-based forest value method. After having analyzed comparatively application conditions, advantage and disadvantage of every method, theauthor of this paper pointed out the factors that should be given attention toin the evaluation operation, and hoped the article could help others.

Key words: forest assets evaluation, replacement cost method, present earning value method, market-based forest value method, Eucalyptus

CLC Number:

WEN Yingqian. Comparison Among Three Assets Evaluation Methods on Eucalyptus Forest[J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2007, 0(6): 58-60.

[1]	LU Xianjian, HUANG Yuhui, YAN Hongbo, WEI Wanqiu, LI Zhenbao. Research on Eucalyptus Extraction Based on Automatic Threshold Decision Tree Classification [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2020, 0(4): 117-126.
[2]	DUAN Chunyan, XU Guangping, SHEN Yuyi, LUO Yajin, LI Yanqiong, ZHANG Denan, SUN Yingjie, HE Chengxin. Ecological Stoichiometry Characteristics of Soils in Eucalyptus Plantations with Different Ages in North Guangxi [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2018, 0(6): 117-124.
[3]	JIANG Yun’an, XIE Shouxin, JIN Aixian, CUI Haiou, WANG Hongchun, ZHOU Rui. Management Strategy of New Generation Eucalyptus Plantation in Brazil and Its Enlightenment [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2018, 0(6): 125-129.
[4]	LIANG Wenhai, LIU Jikai, CHEN Qi, CHEN Xiandong, ZHONG Shiquan. A Comparison of Object-oriented Methods of Extracting Eucalyptus Information Based on GF-2 Images [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2017, 0(6): 54-59.
[5]	LI Zongjun, MO yanqing, MO Xiaoyong, ZHAO Xueli, LIU Ping. Study on Growth and Yield Forecast Model for Eucalyptus Pulpwood Plantation [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2017, 0(1): 31-36.
[6]	ZHANG Zhaoyuan, XIANG Dongyun, XU Jianmin, SONG Xianchong, CHEN Fengfan. Comprehensive Analysis of Growth,Stem Form and Resistance to Leptocybe invasa of Eucalyptus grandis Provenances [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2016, 0(5): 107-111.
[7]	XU Zhiyang, FENG Zhongke, HU Jianquan, ZHENG Yaomin, LIU Cheng. Remote Sensing Estimation of Eucalyptus Plantation Biomass in Huaan County Based on TM Images [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2016, 0(4): 83-87.
[8]	LI Zongjun, LIU Ping, ZHU Yingjuan, MO Xiaoyong, MO Yanqing. Establishment of a Site Index Table for Eucalyptus Pulpwood Plantation [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2016, 0(1): 59-64.
[9]	MOU Zhihui, YANG Guangbin. The Extraction of Eucalyptus Information Based on TM Data Using object-oriented Method [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2014, 0(2): 119-125.
[10]	FAN Wenbin, ZHAO Congju, LIN Zhi, CHEN Hao. Growth Characteristics of Eucalyptus Plantation and Their Responses to Climate Environment in Western Hainan Island [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2013, 0(2): 77-82.
[11]	ZHANG Huiguang. Establishment and Application of the Empirical Yield Table for Fokienia hodginsii Plantation [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2012, 0(3): 61-65.
[12]	WU Jianhua, LI Lingli, YU Xinshui. Effects of Thinning Frequency and Intensity on Growth of Different Seeds of Eucalyptus smithii [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2012, 0(3): 90-93.
[13]	HUANG Chengbiao, NONG Jinde, YANG Gairen, HUANG Xinming, TAO Dayan, ZHU Muhua. The Tree Growth and the Physicochemical Properties of Soil in the new Regions of introduced Eucalyptus urophylla×E.grandis [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2012, 0(1): 70-74.
[14]	XIE Weidong, YE Shaoming, ZHENG Xiaoxian, YANG Mei. The Effects of Different Mixed Treatments on the Growth of Eucalyptus urophylla and Acacia mangium Mixed Stands [J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2008, 0(6): 45-49.

Comparison Among Three Assets Evaluation Methods on Eucalyptus Forest

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 14

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments