Habitat Characteristics and Effects on Growth of Arundinaria faberi in Different Slope Positions of Subalpine Meadow

doi:10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2023.02.010

Abstract

Abstract:

As a dominant plant species in subalpine meadows on the low-latitude plateau,it is of great guiding significance to clarify the habitat characteristics and key growth factors of different slope positions of Arundinaria faberi for its community protection.The research object was Arundinaria faberi in the subalpine meadow of Gaoben Mountain in Xundian,Yunnan.By investigating the characteristics of growth and habitat factors of Arundinaria faberi in different slope positions,the key growth factors of Arundinaria faberi were identified by correlation heat map.The results showed that:1) The air temperature and relative humidity tended to decrease with the increase of the slope position,while the wind speed and solar radiation intensity increased with the increase of the slope position.2) The soil particle composition of different slope positions was mainly composed of silt particles.The soil bulk density increased with the increase of the slope position.The soil moisture content,large aggregate content and soil chemical indicators all increased first and then decreased with the increase of the slope position.The meadow soil was obviously acidic,and the soil quality level reflected by the physical and chemical characteristics of the middle slope soil was relatively higher.3) With the increase of the slope position,the morphology and community characteristics of Arundinaria faberi showed a significant deterioration trend.4) Correlation heat map analysis showed that air temperature,solar radiation intensity,wind speed,soil bulk density and available phosphorus had a great influence on the corresponding growth characteristics of Arundinaria faberi among which air temperature,solar radiation intensity,wind speed and soil bulk density were the most influential key factor for growth.

Key words: subalpine meadow, Arundinaria faberi, slope position, environmental factors, growth effects

CLC Number:

YAN Keyu, CHEN Pingping, LI Jianxing, ZHANG Limei, LIU Hui, CHEN Zhengfa. Habitat Characteristics and Effects on Growth of Arundinaria faberi in Different Slope Positions of Subalpine Meadow[J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2023, 0(2): 70-78.

Figures/Tables 9

Tab.1

Tab.2

Fig.1

Fig.2

Tab.3

Fig.3

Fig.4

Tab.4

Fig.5

References 33

[1]	欧阳志云, 刘建国, 肖寒, 等. 卧龙自然保护区大熊猫生境评价[J]. 生态学报, 2001(11):1869-1874.
[2]	宋词, 郑光玉, 黄炬斌, 等. 高寒灌丛草甸区的弃渣体场地生态修复技术研究[J]. 地质灾害与环境保护, 2021, 32(1):109-112.
[3]	秦自生, 艾伦·泰勒, 刘捷. 大熊猫主食竹种秆龄鉴定及种群动态评估[J]. 四川环境, 1993(4):26-29.
[4]	IUCN. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species[DB/OL].[2023-02-13]. https://www.iucnredlist.org.
[5]	周世强. 更新复壮技术对冷箭竹种群密度及地上部分生物量影响的研究[J]. 竹子研究汇刊, 1994(2):26-36.
[6]	周世强. 冷箭竹更新复壮技术及生态效益分析[J]. 生态经济, 1994(3):53-55.
[7]	马剑, 刘贤德, 金铭, 等. 祁连山青海云杉林土壤理化性质和酶活性海拔分布特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019, 33(2):207-213.
[8]	Edy N, Zakaria E, Anshary A, et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in cocoa plantation affected by different elevations and soil physical-chemical properties[J]. IOP Conference Series:Earth and Environmental Science, 2022, 1075(1):012005. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1075/1/012005
[9]	闵志强, 胡云云, 王得军, 等. 基于哑变量的秦巴山区天然栎类林胸径和树高生长模型研究[J]. 林业资源管理, 2020(5):89-99.
[10]	赵连春, 赵成章, 王小鹏, 等. 秦王川湿地柽柳分布与环境因子的关系[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(10):3422-3431.
[11]	Yang Xueting, Fan Jun, Ge Jiamin, et al. Soil physical and chemical properties and vegetation characteristics of different types of grassland in Qilian Mountains,China[J]. The Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(4):878-886.
[12]	苏妮尔, 沈海龙, 丁佩军, 等. 不同坡位红皮云杉林木生长与土壤理化性质比较[J]. 森林工程, 2020, 36(2):6-11.
[13]	李强, 何国兴, 文铜, 等. 东祁连山高寒草甸土壤理化性质对海拔和坡向的响应及其与植被特征的关系[J]. 干旱区地理, 2022, 45(5):1559-1569.
[14]	杜京旗, 张巧仙, 田晓东, 等. 云顶山亚高山草甸植被分布、物种多样性与土壤化学因子的相关性[J]. 植物研究, 2016, 36(3):444-451. doi: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2016.03.019
[15]	李嘉懿, 初晓辉, 尹海燕, 等. 大狼毒型亚高山草甸植被演替对围封的响应[J]. 中国草地学报, 2021, 43(6):10-16.
[16]	Yang Deshuai, Xu Dandan, Pu Yihan, et al. Responses of subalpine meadow to climatic factors and the time lag effects in Wuyi Mountains from 2000 to 2019[J]. The Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(12):4195-4202.
[17]	程东娟, 张亚丽. 土壤物理实验指导[M]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2012.
[18]	杨剑虹, 王成林, 代亨林. 土壤农化分析与环境监测[M].中国大地出版社, 2008.
[19]	王文富, 邱鼎宜, 吴家才, 等. 云南土壤[M]. 昆明: 云南科技出版社, 1996:578-614.
[20]	郑亚楠, 姚永生, 古丽热娅尼·阿斯哈尔, 等. 不同改良措施对沙质土壤颗粒组成及分形特征的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(9):1665-1671. doi: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2021.09.012
[21]	杨苍玲, 李成学, 杨鸿, 等. 不同施肥处理对红壤坡耕地土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2019, 47(5):256-259.
[22]	谢贤健, 张继. 巨桉人工林下土壤团聚体稳定性及分形特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2012, 26(6):175-179.
[23]	赵玉明, 高晓飞, 姜洪涛. 我国五种主要土壤水稳性团聚体含量研究[J]. 中国水土保持, 2013, 373(4):32-35.
[24]	Neufeldt H, Ayarza M A, Resck D V S, et al. Distribution of water-stable aggregates and aggregating agents in Cerrado Oxisols[J]. Geoderma, 1999, 93(1/2):85-99. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7061(99)00046-4
[25]	Antoine G, Niklaus E. Zimmermann. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology[J]. Ecological Modelling, 2000, 135(2):147-186. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00354-9
[26]	安德帅, 徐丹丹, 濮毅涵, 等. 2000—2019年武夷山亚高山草甸对气候因子的响应及其时滞效应[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(12):4195-4202. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202112.001
[27]	张东杰, 徐翔, 曾小强, 等. 宁夏贺兰山种子植物区系垂直分布格局及其气候解释[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2016, 44(32):53-56.
[28]	王红, 张淑辉, 彭福田, 等. 不同土壤改良剂对土壤理化性质、微生物及桃植株生长的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2020, 52(12):59-65.
[29]	刘西刚, 王勇辉, 焦黎. 夏尔希里自然保护区草地表层土壤理化性质与海拔高度的关系[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2019, 35(6):773-780.
[30]	梦瑶, 陈林, 庞丹波, 等. 贺兰山不同海拔植被下土壤团聚体分布及其稳定性研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021, 35(2):210-216.
[31]	Masto R E, Ansari M A, George J, et al. Co-application of biochar and lignite fly ash on soil nutrients and biological parameters at different crop growth stages of Zea mays[J]. Ecological Enginee-ring, 2013, 58:314-322.
[32]	覃其云, 曹继钊, 李军, 等. 马尾松人工幼林土壤肥力变化及其综合评价研究[J]. 林业资源管理, 2013(1):80-85.
[33]	Vitousek P M, Porder S, Houlton B Z, et al. Terrestrial phosphorus limitation:Mechanisms,implications,and nitrogen-phosphorus interactions[J]. Ecological Applications, 2010, 20(1):5-1. doi: 10.1890/08-0127.1

采样区域编号	坡位	海拔/m	经纬度	平均坡度/(°)	土壤采样点数/个
J1	上坡位	3129~3134	25°50'50″N,103°11'18″E	17.82	8
J2	中坡位	3100~3105	25°50'52″N,103°11'14″E	17.87	5
J3	下坡位	3081~3085	25°50'53″N,103°11'11″E	17.45	6

坡位	空气温度/ ℃	空气相对湿度/%	风速/ (m/s)	太阳辐射强度/(MJ/m²)
上坡位	14.9	69.9	9.5	4450.3
中坡位	15.1	70.1	8.3	4441.9
下坡位	15.2	70.2	7.6	4434.6

土壤团聚体类别	坡位	不同团聚体粒径分级所占百分比/%
土壤团聚体类别	坡位	>10 mm	>5~10 mm	>2~5 mm	>1~2 mm	>0.5~1 mm	>0.25~0.5 mm	≤0.25 mm
	下坡位	0.00	1.11	8.94	8.94	28.26	28.22	24.53
机械稳定性团聚体	中坡位	7.69	15.37	9.23	9.23	24.63	17.04	16.81
	上坡位	5.22	11.93	21.05	8.17	17.67	18.34	17.62
	下坡位	0.00	1.46	14.07	8.34	17.82	19.14	39.17
水稳性团聚体	中坡位	5.61	15.57	20.26	7.73	16.26	9.85	24.72
	上坡位	6.21	11.57	18.82	8.54	11.60	12.17	31.09

坡位	冷箭竹植株形态特征参数均值
坡位	株高/m	地径/mm	鞭根直径/mm	须根数/根
上坡位	0.15	5.10	4.32	6
中坡位	0.65	10.04	6.08	8
下坡位	2.10	10.20	7.63	14