Effects of Application of Bag-Controlled Slow-Release Fertilizer on Growth and Soil Nutrients of Eucalyptus and Chinese Fir Plantation

doi:10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2021.05.014

Abstract

Abstract:

This study aimed to explore the effect of bag-controlled slow-release fertilizer on forest growth and soil nutrient improvement in eucalyptus and Chinese fir plantations.We measured forest growth index and soil physical and chemical properties under six fertilization treatments:conventional fertilization (G1),bag controlled slow-release fertilizer (G2),biological fertilizer (G3-1,G3-2,G3-3)and no fertilizer (CK).The results showed that:1)Compared with G1,the tree height,DBH and volume of individual tree of eucalyptus were increased by 2.97%,5.14% and 1.89%,respectively,and those of Chinese fir were increased by-2.33%,0.82% and 15.79%,respectively after 16 months of fertilization.2)The effect on eucalyptus volume was as follows:G3-3>G3-2> G2>G1>G3-1>CK and the Chinese fir volume was G3-3> G2>G3-2> G1>G3-1>CK.3)The contents of organic matter,total nitrogen,total phosphorus,total potassium and nitrogen in the soil were increased,and the pH of the soil was decreased.In general,the application of G1,G2,and G3-1,G3-2,G3-3 can promote the growth of trees and improve the soil environment among which G2 is outperform G3-1 and G1,but worse than G3-3 indicating that the application of bag-controlled slow-release fertilizer could not only promote the growth of trees,but also facilitate soil stability and reduce the use of chemical fertilizer.

Key words: bag-controlled slow-release fertilizer, biological fertilizer, soil nutrient, eucalyptus, Chinese fir

CLC Number:

S147.2
S714

LUO Mi, HUANG Changmou, HAN Hua, HUANG Minqiu, NING Jian, PAN Bo, CAO Jizhao. Effects of Application of Bag-Controlled Slow-Release Fertilizer on Growth and Soil Nutrients of Eucalyptus and Chinese Fir Plantation[J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2021, 0(5): 104-111.

Figures/Tables 8

Tab.1

Tab.2

Tab.3

Calculation formula of growing stock of different tree species

树种	立木材积公式	文献
杉木	$V 杉 = 0.65671 × 10 - 4 × D 1.769412 × H 1.069769$	[20]
桉树	$V 桉 = C 0 × D C 1 - C 2 × (D + H)) × H (C 3 + C 4 × (D + H))$	[21]

Tab.3

Tab.4

Tab.5

Tab.6

Fig.1

Fig.2

References 26

[1]	何正锋. 七坡林场不同混交模式对降香黄檀生长及土壤理化性质的影响[D]. 南宁:广西大学, 2018.
[2]	李晓伟. 传统回归和机器学习人工林生长模型与经济成熟研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2020.
[3]	高德才, 张蕾, 刘强, 等. 旱地土壤施用生物炭减少土壤氮损失及提高氮素利用率[J]. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(6):54-61.
[4]	宋跃朋, 肖亮, 卜琛皞, 等. 高产优质毛白杨良种施肥响应特性解析[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2019, 41(8):19-27.
[5]	席本野, 王烨, 贾黎明. 滴灌施肥下施氮量和施氮频率对毛白杨生物量及氮吸收的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(5):63-73.
[6]	廖逸宁, 郭素娟, 王芳芳, 等. 有机-无机肥配施对板栗园土壤肥力及根系功能性状的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版, 2021, 45(5):84-92.
[7]	Xiao Yuansong, Peng Futian, Zhang Yafei, et al. Effect of bag-controlled release fertilizer on nitrogen loss,greenhouse gas emissions,and nitrogen applied amount in peach production[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 234:258-274. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.219
[8]	曹继钊, 潘波, 林海能. 袋控缓释肥料的研究发展与技术创新[J]. 广西林业科学, 2020, 49(3):466-470.
[9]	沙建川, 葛顺峰, 陈建明, 等. 袋控肥对苹果土壤Nmin及15N-氮素吸收利用和损失的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2017, 31(2):267-271.
[10]	沈秀丽, 柳思远, 沈玉君, 等. 不同粒径生物炭包膜尿素缓释肥性能及缓释效果[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(15):159-166.
[11]	Zhang Yafei, Luo Jingjing, Peng Futian, et al. Application of Bag-Controlled Release Fertilizer Facilitated New Root Formation,Delayed Leaf,and Root Senescence in Peach Trees and Improved Nitrogen Utilization Efficiency[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2021, 12:627313. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.627313 pmid: 33868330
[12]	梁新安, 张守仕, 梁芳芳, 等. 袋控缓释肥对日光温室番茄生长发育及土壤氮素淋失的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2015, 29(3):306-310.
[13]	Ha B Y, Kim H R, Kim D H, et al. Growth effects of the application of new controlled-release fertilizers on Phalaenopsis spp[J]. 2018, 61(6):625-633.
[14]	沙建川, 王芬, 田歌, 等. 控释氮肥和袋控肥对‘王林’苹果15N-尿素利用及其在土壤累积的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(5):1421-1428.
[15]	张乐. 袋控缓释肥对新疆三个葡萄品种产量和品质的影响[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学, 2011.
[16]	王玉军, 邹应斌, 张夫道. 掺混型缓/控释肥对杂交晚稻产量的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2009(5):28-33.
[17]	张宣, 宋韬亮, 刘平, 等. 枣缩果病发生与矿质元素含量的关系[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(2):109-117.
[18]	Liu Lijuan, Peng Futian, Wang Xinliang. Effects of bag-controlled release fertilizer on nitrogen utilization rate,growth and fruiting of the ‘Fuji’ apple[J]. 2010, 33(13):1904-1913.
[19]	国家林业局. 森林土壤分析方法[M]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2000.
[20]	陈代喜, 李魁鹏, 黄开勇, 等. 广西20年生杉木无性系测定与早期选择研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2017, 37(11):9-13.
[21]	陈健波, 郭东强, 朱建武, 等. 尾巨桉等桉树无性系生长特性分析及选择[J]. 林业科技通讯, 2020(8):27-31.
[22]	杨修一. 控释尿素和氯化钾对盐碱地棉花生长发育及土壤肥力的影响[D]. 泰安:山东农业大学, 2018.
[23]	吕红翠. 袋控施肥对杉木幼林生长效应及土壤性质的影响研究[D]. 福州:福建农林大学, 2016.
[24]	王爱斌, 宋慧芳, 张流洋, 等. 生物肥和菌肥对蓝莓苗生长及土壤养分的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报, 2020, 44(6):63-70.
[25]	孙占育, 郭春会, 刘小菊. 袋控缓释肥对克瑞森葡萄产量和品质的影响[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2011, 26(6):85-87.
[26]	宋海岩, 陈栋, 涂美艳, 等. 多年施用袋控缓释肥对桃生长发育及产量品质的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2020, 33(1):104-108.

供试树种	pH	有机质/(g/kg)	全氮/(g/kg)	全磷/(g/kg)	全钾/(g/kg)	碱解氮/(mg/kg)
桉树	4.45±0.07	48.06±5.87	1.82±0.32	0.74±0.11	3.03±0.44	78.80±45.36
杉木	4.63±0.18	17.14±0.59	0.74±0.19	0.35±0.01	8.05±0.47	54.03±19.07

处理组编号	施肥处理	桉树		杉木
处理组编号	施肥处理	施肥量/(kg/hm²)	施肥面积/hm²	施肥量/(kg/hm²)	施肥面积/hm²
CK	未施肥对照	0	0.5	0	0.5
G1	非袋控肥	1650	1	2505	2
G2	袋控缓释肥	1650	1	2505	2
G3-1	生物有机肥1	1650	1	2505	2
G3-2	生物有机肥2	3300	1	5010	1
G3-3	生物有机肥3	4950	1	7515	1

树种	处理	CK	G1	G2	G3-1	G3-2	G3-3
桉树
	DBH1/cm	9.40	9.37	9.29	9.12	10.14	9.75
	T1/cm	1.32	1.47	1.63	1.41	1.42	1.56
	T2/cm	2.0	2.36	2.43	2.16	2.08	2.62
	P1/%	14.04	15.69	17.55	15.46	14.00	16.00
	P2/%	21.28	25.19	26.16	23.68	20.51	26.87
杉木
	DBH1/cm	3.12	2.64	3.28	3.15	3.11	3.06
	T1/cm	2.86	3.60	3.34	3.30	4.01	4.00
	T2/cm	4.18	5.14	5.02	4.60	4.87	5.16
	P1/%	91.67	136.36	101.83	104.76	128.94	130.72
	P2/%	133.97	194.70	153.05	146.03	156.59	168.63

树种	处理	CK	G1	G2	G3-1	G3-2	G3-3
桉树
	H1/m	12.52	12.95	12.79	12.21	13.05	12.22
	T1/m	0.47	0.58	0.83	0.76	0.79	1.03
	T2/m	3.52	3.70	3.89	3.63	3.57	3.91
	P1/%	3.75	4.48	6.49	6.22	6.05	8.43
	P2/%	28.11	28.57	30.41	29.73	27.36	31.99
杉木
	H1/m	2.70	2.59	2.87	2.72	2.74	2.73
	T1/m	1.40	1.84	1.66	1.65	2.00	2.09
	T2/m	1.80	2.43	2.45	2.37	2.57	2.78
	P1/%	51.85	71.04	57.84	60.66	72.99	76.56
	P2/%	66.67	93.82	85.37	87.13	93.79	101.83

树种	处理	CK	G1	G2	G3-1	G3-2	G3-3
桉树
	V1/ cm³	0.04469	0.04582	0.04460	0.04134	0.05328	0.04672
	T1/ cm³	0.01401	0.01638	0.01884	0.01540	0.01812	0.02023
	T2/ cm³	0.03564	0.04229	0.04309	0.03649	0.04535	0.04693
	P1/%	31.36	35.75	42.23	37.26	34.02	43.30
	P2/%	79.76	91.63	96.93	88.26	85.11	100.47
杉木
	V1/ cm³	0.00142	0.00101	0.00166	0.00146	0.00144	0.00139
	T1/ cm³	0.00561	0.00723	0.00771	0.00715	0.00975	0.00983
	T2/ cm³	0.00964	0.01292	0.01496	0.01257	0.01402	0.01555
	P1/%	394.33	713.55	464.53	490.21	678.26	706.41
	P2/%	677.21	1273.96	900.38	861.53	975.25	1117.90