Comparison of Chlorophyll Fluorescence Characteristics Between Torreya jiulongshanensis Leaves and its Widespread Congener T.Grandis

doi:10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2021.01.012

Abstract

Abstract:

In order to provide scientific basis for the conservation of Torreya jiulongshanensis germplasm resources,response of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of T.jiulongshanensis(male and female) and its widespread congener T.grandis leaves(under cultivation and field conditions,respectively) to light intensity are compared in this paper.The results show that,under cultivation conditions,the maximum fluorescence value of photosystem I of female seedlings of T.jiulongshanensis is higher than that of male seedlings and T.grandis.The light saturation points of female and male seedlings of T.jiulongshanensis are 788.581 and 550.640 μmol/(m²·s),respectively,and the corresponding maximum electron transfer rates are 40.690 and 39.546 μmol/(m²·s),respectively.Similarly,under field conditions,the light saturation points of female and male plants of T.jiulongshanensis are significantly higher than those of T.grandis,which stand at 1 165.361 and 1 416.817 μmol/(m²·s),respectively.The maximum electron transfer rate of photosystem II of female plants of T.jiulongshanensis is the highest,which is 80.322 μmol/(m²·s).Therefore,T.jiulongshanensis is a sunny tree species and has stronger photosynthetic potential than T.grandis.

Key words: Torreya jiulongshanensis, T.grandis, cultivation conditions, field conditions, chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, light intensity

CLC Number:

Q9453.79

ZHENG Yingmao, ZHOU Yuhong, PAN Chengchun, LIU Julian, LAN Benkuan, KANG Huajing. Comparison of Chlorophyll Fluorescence Characteristics Between Torreya jiulongshanensis Leaves and its Widespread Congener T.Grandis[J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2021, 0(1): 86-93.

Figures/Tables 8

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Tab.1

Fig.4

Fig.5

Tab.2

Fig.6

References 25

[1]	刘玉壶, 夏念和, 杨惠秋. 木兰科(Magnoliaceae)的起源、进化和地理分布[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 1995,4(3):1-12.
[2]	潘晨, 朱希扬, 贾文晓, 等. 上海市近地面CO₂浓度及其与下垫面特征的定量关系[J]. 应用生态学报, 2015,26(7):2123-2130.
[3]	许大全. 光合作用效[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 2002.
[4]	Macarthur R H, Connell J H. The biology of populations[M]. New York: Wiley and Sons Press, 2000.
[5]	张文辉, 祖元刚, 马克明. 裂叶沙参与泡沙参种群分布格局分形特征的分析[J]. 植物生态报, 1999,23(1):31-39.
[6]	郭起荣, 俞志雄, 施建敏. 华木莲与木莲属两树种光合生理生态研究[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2003,25(5):645-651.
[7]	Cui Hongxia, Jiang Gaoming, Niu Shuli, et al. Gas exchanges of an endangered species Syringa pinnatifolia and a widespread congener S.Oblate[J]. Photosynthetica, 2004,42:529-534.
[8]	石松利, 王迎春, 周红兵, 等. 濒危种四合木与其近缘种霸王水分关系参数和光合特性的比较[J]. 生态学报, 2012,32(4):1163-1173.
[9]	柴胜丰, 庄雪影, 王满莲, 等. 濒危植物毛瓣金花茶与其同属广布种茶光合特性的比较[J]. 广西植物, 2015,35(5):623-630.
[10]	祖元刚, 张文辉, 阎秀峰, 等. 濒危植物裂叶沙参保护生物学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1999.
[11]	孙孟军, 邱瑶德. 浙江林业自然资源:野生植物卷[M]. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2002.
[12]	滕童莹, 潘成椿, 刘菊莲, 等. 浙江榧属植物叶片变异及其分类学意义[J]. 杭州师范大学学报:自然科学版, 2017,16(1):9-13.
[13]	李红, 郑春芳, 陈继浓, 等. 不同温度下秋茄树幼苗叶绿素荧光参数对光强的响应[J]. 浙江林业科技, 2020,40(2):17-22.
[14]	叶子飘. 光合作用对光和CO₂响应模型的研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010,34(6):727-740.
[15]	Ye Zipiao. A new model for relationship between irradiance and the rate of photosynjournal in Oryza sativa[J]. Photosynjournal, 2007,45:637-640.
[16]	郎莹, 张光灿, 张征坤, 等. 不同土壤水分下山杏光合作用光响应过程及其模拟[J]. 生态学报, 2011,31(16):4499-4509.
[17]	陆佩玲, 于强, 罗毅, 等. 冬小麦光合作用的光响应曲线的拟合[J]. 中国农业气象, 2001,22(2):12-14.
[18]	Zhang Shouren. A discussion on chlorophyll fluorescence kinetics parameters and their significance[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 1999,16:444-448.
[19]	Yordanova R Y, Alexieva V S, Popova L P. Influence of root oxygen deficiency on photosynjournal and antioxidant status in barley plants[J]. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, 2003,50:163-167.
[20]	Wang Yuexia, Sun Guorong, Wang Jianbo, et al. Relationships among MDA content,plasma membrane permeability and the chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of Puccinellia tenuiflora seedlings under NaCl stress[J]. Acta Ecology Sinica, 2006,26:122-129.
[21]	Zhang Sheng, Chen Lianghua, Duan Baoli, et al. Populus cathayana males exhibit more efficient protective mechanisms than females under drought stress[J]. Forest Ecology and Management. 2012,275:68-78.
[22]	Li Chunyang, Xu Gang, Zang Runguo, et al. Sex-related differences in leaf morphological and physiological responses in Hippophae rharrmoides along an altitudinal gradient[J]. Tree Physiology, 2007,27:399-406. doi: 10.1093/treephys/27.3.399 pmid: 17241981
[23]	樊艳欣, 姜永雷, 陈珂, 等. 贡嘎山高低海拔上优势杨柳科植物性别比例与繁殖特性[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2018,24(4):704-710.
[24]	Zhang Sheng, Jiang Hao, Zhao Hongxia, et al. Sexually different physiological responses of Populus cathayana to nitrogen and phosphorus deficiencies[J]. Tree Physiology, 2014,34:343-354. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpu025 pmid: 24739232
[25]	Wang Xianzhong, Curtis P S. Gender-specific responses of Populus tremuloides to atmospheric CO₂ enrichment[J]. New Phytologist, 2001,150:675-684.

植物	模型	初始斜率/ (μmol/mol)	最大电子传递速率/ μmol/(m²·s)	饱和光强/ μmol/(m²·s)	确定系数(R²)
榧树	测量值	—	34.286±5.658 b	?500 a	—
	拟合值 model I	0.445±0.045	35.339±5.897 b	454.130±25.859 a	0.980±0.006
	model II	0.551±0.057	40.186±7.011 a	242.554±7.319 b	0.954±0.013
	model III	0.287±0.023	34.080±5.233 b	172.810±5.609 c	0.998±0.001
	modelIV	0.415±0.049	35.334±5.377 b	188.265±10.284 c	0.988±0.006
九龙山榧-雄	测量值	—	39.800±3.408 b	?759 a	—
	拟合值 model I	0.447±0.013	39.546±3.315 b	550.640±50.913 b	0.986±0.002
	model II	0.526±0.022	46.033±4.252 a	258.474±8.515 c	0.975±0.006
	model III	0.345±0.081	40.342±3.817 b	203.618±24.380 d	0.995±0.08
	model IV	0.401±0.017	38.791±3.342 b	198.067±6.805 d	0.993±0.001
九龙山榧-雌	测量值	—	41.243±3.160 b	?759 a	—
	拟合值 model I	0.416±0.021	40.690±3.038 b	788.581±92.911a	0.995±0.002
	model II	0.453±0.030	47.366±3.988 a	276.608±7.646 b	0.993±0.003
	model III	0.345±0.015	43.357±3.048 b	238.162±11.668 c	0.998±0.001
	model IV	0.344±0.024	39.479±3.318 b	214.681±6.080c	0.995±0.001

植物	初始斜率/(μmol/mol)	最大电子传递速率/(μmol/(m²·s))	饱和光强/(μmol/(m²·s))	确定系数(R²)
榧树	0.448±0.020a	64.743± 1.337b	914.207±116.195c	0.877±0.033
九龙山榧-雄	0.459±0.082a	66.308±16.309b	1416.817± 34.586a	0.878±0.046
九龙山榧-雌	0.439±0.014a	80.322± 4.407a	1165.361±141.734b	0.909±0.065