Study on the Space-temporal Evolution Feature of the Rocky Desertification in Typical Karst Area of Eastern Yunnan

doi:10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2019.02.015

Abstract

Abstract:

Rocky desertification is one of the three major problems of land degradation in southwest China,and has long been a focus issue in academic circle.Rocky desertification may lead to the decline of water conservation capacity of the top soil,water shortage and low land productivity,which helps to accelerate the process of regional poverty.Thus,the knowledge of its distributive characteristics and development trend is of great significance for our scientific understanding and control work.Based on the data of the remote sensing images in Shizong county in 1995,2005 and 2015 respectively,this paper gives an analysis of the regional space-time change of rocky desertification in the past two decades by using the method of the decision trees to extract the distribution data of rocky desertification (6 grades are included:zero,potential,light,moderate,intensive and high-intensive). The spatial and temporal dynamic model of rocky desertification and the transfer matrix are used.The study results are as follows:(1) On time dimension,there is a great reduction in the potential,light and moderate rocky desertification,also a reduction in the intensive and high-intensive rocky desertification,but in a small range.There are increases both in zero desertification and the dynamic degree of integrated rocky desertification.Besides,a significant change in the dynamic degree of potential and mild rocky desertification can be found.(2) On spatial dimension,the severely-stricken areas of rocky desertification are mainly distributed in the following towns:Longqing,Wulong and Zhuji.As some distinctive features in the spatial distribution pattern,rocky desertification in these regions covers a wide range and complete grades.Meanwhile,in the central part,it shows a weak distribution grade of the linked rocky desertification areas.In the western and eastern parts,it presents a character of continuous distribution in moderate,intensive as well as high-intensive rocky desertification.

Key words: rocky desertification, space-time change, dynamic degree, the transfer matrix, Karst area

CLC Number:

X171

ZHANG Ruijiao, ZHANG Chao, LU Shuangfei, ZHONG Enzhu. Study on the Space-temporal Evolution Feature of the Rocky Desertification in Typical Karst Area of Eastern Yunnan[J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2019, 0(2): 99-108.

Figures/Tables 8

Fig.1

Tab.1

Tab.2

Tab.3

Fig.2

Tab.4

Tab.5

Tab.6

References 19

[1]	陈利, 林辉, 孙华. 基于SPOT-5影像的冷水江市岩溶区石漠化时空演变研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2012,32(8):22-27.
[2]	戴全厚, 严友进. 西南喀斯特石漠化与水土流失研究进展[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018,32(2):1-9.
[3]	王世杰. 喀斯特石漠化概念演绎及其科学内涵的探讨[J]. 中国岩溶, 2002,21(2):101-105.
[4]	Sweeting M M. Karst in China,Its Geomorp Hology and Environment[M]. Berlin:Springer Verlag, 1995.
[5]	Peter J. Radon measurements in karst caves in Slovenia[J]. Environment International, 1996,22(1):429-432. doi: 10.1016/S0160-4120(96)00142-0
[6]	Grillo B, Braitenberg C, Nagy I, et al. Cansiglio Karst Plateau:10 Years of Geodetic-Hydrological Observations in Seismically Active Northeast Italy[J]. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2018,175(5):1765-1781. doi: 10.1007/s00024-018-1860-7
[7]	Martel R, Castellazzi P, Gloaguen E, et al. ERT,GPR,InSAR,and tracer tests to characterize karst aquifer systems under urban areas:The case of Quebec City[J]. Geomorphology, 2018,310:45-56. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.03.003
[8]	Mylroie J R, Mylroie J E. Development of the carbonate island karst model[J]. Journal of Cave and Karst Studies, 2007,69(1):59-75.
[9]	刘芳, 何报寅, 张亮, 等. 基于热红外遥感的广西平果县石漠化初步研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2016,25(6):952-956. doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201606011
[10]	左太安, 刁承泰, 苏维词, 等. 毕节试验区石漠化时空演变过程和演变特征[J]. 生态学报, 2014,34(23):7067-7077. doi: 10.5846/stxb201401140108
[11]	李阳兵, 罗光杰, 程安云, 等. 黔中高原面石漠化演变典型案例研究——以普定后寨河地区为例[J]. 地理研究, 2013,32(5):828-838. doi: 10.11821/yj2013050006
[12]	胡宝清, 蒋树芳, 廖赤眉, 等. 基于3S技术的广西喀斯特石漠化驱动机制图谱分析——以广西壮族自治区为例[J]. 山地学报, 2006,24(2):234-241.
[13]	李松, 罗绪强. 基于多时相遥感的喀斯特石漠化监测研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015,31(11):262-267.
[14]	Huang Qiuhao, Cai Yunlong. Mapping karst rock in southwest China[J]. Mountain Research and Development, 2009,29(1):14-20.
[15]	熊康宁, 黎平, 周忠发, 等. 喀斯特石漠化的遥感-GIS典型研究——以贵州省为例[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2002.
[16]	常春艳, 赵庚星, 王凌, 等. 黄河口生态脆弱区土地利用时空变化及驱动因素分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2012,28(24):226-234.
[17]	史迎春, 舒英格. 喀斯特石漠化时空变化特征及驱动因子分析——以贵州晴隆县为例[J].林业资源管理, 2017(1):135-143.
[18]	任扬航, 马明国, 张霞, 等. 典型喀斯特石漠化地区植被动态监测与土地利用变化的影响分析[J]. 中国岩溶, 2016,35(5):550-556.
[19]	王妮. 基于3S技术的森林资源变化动态监测[D]. 南京:南京林业大学, 2012: 65.

等级	1995年		2005年		2015年
等级	面积/km²	占总土地面积/%	面积/km²	占总土地面积/%	面积/km²	占总土地面积/%
无石漠化	1749.8	62.91	1772.56	63.74	1900.03	68.32
潜在	111.02	4.00	106.6	3.83	50.30	1.81
轻度	48.49	1.74	91.58	3.29	30.83	1.11
中度	113.89	4.10	56.38	2.03	44.69	1.61
强度	30.25	1.09	26.49	0.95	27.84	1.00
极强度	4.53	0.16	4.37	0.16	4.29	0.15
非岩溶区	723.19	26.00	723.19	26.00	723.19	26.00
总和	2781.17	100.00	2781.17	100.00	2781.17	100.00

等级	面积/km²			1995—2005年		2005—2015年		1995—2015年
等级	1995	2005	2015	变化面积/km²	动态度/%	变化面积/km²	动态度/%	变化面积/km²	动态度/%
无石漠化	1749.80	1772.56	1900.03	22.76	0.13	127.47	0.72	150.23	0.43
潜在	111.02	106.60	50.30	-4.42	-0.40	-56.30	-5.28	-60.72	-2.73
轻度	48.49	91.58	30.83	43.09	8.89	-60.75	-6.63	-17.66	-1.82
中度	113.89	56.38	44.69	-57.51	-5.05	-11.69	-2.07	-69.20	-3.03
强度	30.25	26.49	27.84	-3.76	-1.24	1.35	0.51	-2.41	-0.40
极强度	4.53	4.37	4.29	-0.16	-0.35	-0.08	-0.18	-0.24	-0.26

1995—2005年			2005—2015年			1995—2015年
变化面积/km²	动态度/%		变化面积/km²	动态度/%		变化面积/km²		动态度/%
131.7	0.47		257.64	0.93		300.46		0.54

1995	2005
1995	无石漠化	潜在石漠化	轻度石漠化	中度石漠化	强度石漠化	极强度石漠化
无石漠化	1746.98	0.32	2.43	0.07	0	0
潜在石漠化	7.00	103.75	0.26	0.01	0	0
轻度石漠化	9.59	0.66	38.24	0	0	0
中度石漠化	6.72	0.67	50.55	55.95	0	0
强度石漠化	2.16	1.2	0.06	0.37	26.46	0
极强度石漠化	0.11	0	0.02	0	0.03	4.37

2005	2015
2005	无石漠化	潜在石漠化	轻度石漠化	中度石漠化	强度石漠化	极强度石漠化
无石漠化	1772.56	0	0	0	0	0
潜在石漠化	56.97	49.63	0	0	0	0
轻度石漠化	60.66	0.09	30.62	0	0.21	0
中度石漠化	9.58	0.58	0	44.07	1.7	0.45
强度石漠化	0.24	0	0.21	0.48	25.56	0
极强度石漠化	0.02	0	0	0.14	0.37	3.84