Development and Application of Benefit Evaluation System for Soil and Water Conservation in Small Watersheds —A Case Study of Puwa Small Watershed in Fangshan District,Beijing

doi:10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2018.01.019

Abstract

Abstract:

The evaluation of soil and water conservation benefit of comprehensive management of small watershed is not only of guiding significance for promoting the comprehensive management of small watersheds,but also has important reference value for the assessment of green GDP in promoting the construction of ecological civilization in our country.In order to improve the efficiency of evaluating the benefits of soil and water conservation in small watersheds and to standardize the evaluation process.In this study,the basic data are small watershed topographic maps,land use distribution map,soil texture map and field survey data.The author uses relational database technology,spatial database technology and ArcGIS Engine secondary development technology,and together with the distributed hydrological model and revised universal soil loss equation, has developed a benefit evaluation system of soil and water conservation in small watersheds.The system can realize the six functions of data management,hydrological benefits evaluation,soil maintaining function evaluation,ecological service function evaluation,main channel evaluation and economic benefit evaluation.This study will elaborate on two main functions of soil maintaining function evaluation and main channel evaluation.The system is used for evaluating Puwa small watershed,which is the earliest one in carrying out the construction of ecological clean watershed in Fangshan District,Beijing.The results showed that the soil erosion intensity decreased significantly before and after the comprehensive management of small watershed.Land use change and vegetation restoration were the main influencing factors of soil erosion protection.The main channel hydro-geomorphology is generally good,poorly assessed channels are mainly distributed in the middle and lower reaches where human activities are frequent,and human activities are the main factor affecting the channel environment.

Key words: small watershed comprehensive management, benefit evaluation, soil erosion, channel hydrological topography, evaluation system

CLC Number:

S157
P208.2

ZHU Chunzhu, ZHAO Tianzhong, SUN Ruoxiu, YU Zhancheng, ZHANG Jianjun. Development and Application of Benefit Evaluation System for Soil and Water Conservation in Small Watersheds —A Case Study of Puwa Small Watershed in Fangshan District,Beijing[J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2018, 0(1): 132-140.

Figures/Tables 10

Fig.1

Fig.2

Tab.1

Soil erosion intensity factor formulas

因子名称	计算公式	变量说明
降雨侵蚀力(R)	$R 年 = α ∑ j = 1 m P d ij β$	$P d ij 为第 i 年第 j$ 日大于等于12mm的日雨量 $m 是第 i$ 年日雨量大于等于12mm的日数 $α, β$ 为回归系数
土壤可蚀性因子 (K)	$K = 2.1 × 10 - 4 M 1.14 12 - OM + 3.25 S - 2 + 2.5 P - 3 / 100$ $M = N 1 100 - N 2$ 或 $M = N 1 N 3 + N 4$	$N 1$ 为粒径在0.002~0.1mm之间的土壤颗粒含量百分比 $N 2$ 为粒径<0.002mm的土壤粘粒含量百分比 $N 3$ 为粒径0.002~0.05mm的土壤粉砂含量百分比 $N 4$ 为粒径0.05~2mm的土壤颗粒含量百分比 $OM$ 为土壤有机质含量(%) $S$ 为土壤结构系数 $P$ 为土壤渗透性等级
坡长因子 (L)	$L = λ / 22.1 m$ $m = 0.2 θ ≤ 1 ° 0.3 1 ° < θ ≤ 3 ° 0.4 3 ° < θ ≤ 5 ° 0.5 θ > 5 °$	$L$ 为坡长因子(无量纲) $λ$ 为坡长(m) $θ$ 为坡度值(°)
坡度因子 (S)	$S = 10.8 × sin θ + 0.03 θ < 5 ° 16.8 × sin θ - 0.5 5 ° < θ < 10 ° 21.9 × sin θ - 0.96 θ ≥ 30 °$	$S$ 为坡度因子(无量纲) $θ$ 为坡度值(°)

Tab.1

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Fig.7

Fig.8

Fig.9

References 21

[1]	王礼先. 小流域综合治理的概念与原则[J]. 中国水土保持, 2006(2):16-17.
[2]	张洪江. 我国小流域综合治理面临的问题与对策[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2016,14(1):131-137.
[3]	王一鸣, 高鹏, 穆兴民, 等. 南方红壤丘陵区小流域水土保持综合效益评价——以江西阳坑小流域为例[J]. 水土保持研究, 2017,24(5):6-13.
[4]	谢磊, 武晓峰, 段淑怀. 北京市山区小流域生态清洁程度评价指标体系研究[J]. 中国水土保持, 2012(10):1-2.
[5]	蒲朝勇, 高媛. 生态清洁小流域建设现状与展望[J]. 中国水土保持, 2015(6):7-10.
[6]	尚书. 小流域土壤侵蚀评价系统的设计与实现[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2015.
[7]	祝赢, 章文波, 刘素红, 等. 第一次全国水利普查侵蚀模数的批量计算方法——基于CSLE和GIS的土壤水蚀模数计算器设计与应用[J]. 水土保持通报, 2012,32(5):291-295.
[8]	陈金星, 岳德鹏, 王计平, 等. 土壤侵蚀GIS计算系统的研建与应用[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2016,31(1):206-213.
[9]	国家林业局. LY/T 1721-2008(2010),森林生态系统服务功能评估规范[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社,2010年.
[10]	张建军, 纳磊, 张波. HEC-HMS分布式水文模型在黄土高原小流域的可应用性[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2009,31(3):52-57.
[11]	Rabi Gyawali, Watkins D W. Continuous hydrologic modeling of snow-affected watersheds in the Great Lakes Basin using HEC-HMS[J]. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering-ASCE, 2013,18(1):29-39.
[12]	Hydrologic Engineering Center(HEC),Institute for Water Resources,(2015).Hydrologic Modeling System HEC-HMS User’s Manual[M]. Version 4.1,CPT 74A,US Army Corps of Engineering,Davis,CA,USA.
[13]	水利部水土保持司. SL190-2007,土壤侵蚀分类分级标准[S]. 北京:中国水利水电, 2007.
[14]	国务院第一次全国水利普查领导小组办公室. 水土保持情况普查[M]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2010.
[15]	Wischmeier W.H, Smith D.D. Predicting Rainfall Erosion Losses—a Guide to Conservation Planning[M]. United States Dept.of Agriculture.Agriculture Handbook, 1978: 537.
[16]	符素华, 刘宝元, 周贵云, 等. 坡长坡度因子计算工具[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2015,13(5):105-110.
[17]	Mccool D K, Brown L C, Foster G R, et al. Revised slope steepness factor for the universal soil loss equation[J]. Transactions of the ASAE-American Society of Agricultural Engineers(USA), 1987,30(5):1387-1396.
[18]	Liu B Y, Nearing M A, Shi P J, et al. Slope length effects on soil loss for steep slopes.[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1994,64(5):1759-1763.
[19]	刘淼, 胡远满, 徐崇刚. 基于GIS、RS和RUSLE的林区土壤侵蚀定量研究——以大兴安岭呼中地区为例[J]. 水土保持研究, 2004,11(3):21-24.
[20]	北京市水务局. DB11/T 1173-2015,山区河流水文地貌评价导则[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2015.
[21]	陈维川. 北京蒲洼自然保护区植物多样性及其保护研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2005.