Evaluation on Site Quality of Larch Plantations in Dongjingcheng

doi:10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2017.02.010

Abstract

Abstract:

Investigation was carried out in larch plantations growing in Dongjingcheng Forestry Bureau,Heilongjiang Province,China.The main factors affecting the growth of the stands were analyzed by Quantitative Theory I.It was found that the main factors were altitude,soil depth and aspect,respectively.With the 3 leading site factors the stands are divided into 16 site types.Through the establishment of the quality evaluation model of larch plantations,the model is used for appraising the quality of larch plantations in Dongjingcheng,16 site types are divided into 3 categories:excellent,middle and poor.The result of examination of the model indicated that it met the precision requirements.

Key words: larch plantations, Quantitative Theory I, site classification, site quality valuation

CLC Number:

S791.22

LI Yanjie, ZHOU Lai, JIN Aixian, SUN Yujun. Evaluation on Site Quality of Larch Plantations in Dongjingcheng[J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2017, 0(2): 53-57.

Figures/Tables 6

Tab.1

Tab.2

Tab.3

Tab.4

Tab.5

Tab.6

References 11

[1]	朱光玉 . 杉木与马尾松地位指数互道模型的研究[D]. 长沙:中南林业科技大学, 2006: 6.
[2]	段卫明, 汪昌树, 李朝栋 , 等. 永新县用材林基地立地质量评价及二元立木材积动态模型的研究总报告[J]. 江西林业科技, 1994(2):2-13.
[3]	Carmen W H. Forest site quality evaluation in the United States [M]. Waltham, Massachusetts:Academic Press, 1975.
[4]	Browh H G, Loewestein H . Predicting site productivity of mixed conifer stand in Northern Idaho from soil and topographic variables[J]. Soil Sic. Am. J., 1978,42(6):967-971.
[5]	Margaret G S, Caimean W H . Jack pine site quality in relation to soil and topography in north central Ontario[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 1988,18(3):297-305. doi: 10.1139/x88-046
[6]	Haggland B . Evaluation of forest site productivity[J]. F. For. Ads., 1981,42:515-527.
[7]	杨双保, 潘德乾 . 小陇山林区林地立地类型划分与林地质量评价的研究[J]. 甘肃林业科技, 2000,25(4):20-26.
[8]	张晓丽, 游先祥 . 应用“3S”技术进行北京市森林立地分类和立地质量评价的研究[J]. 遥感学报, 1998,2(4):292-297. doi: 10.11834/jrs.19980411
[9]	樊良新 . GIS的王家沟流域林业立地评价及其管理系统的研究[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学, 2004.
[10]	王永昌, 张金池 . 基于遥感技术的云台山立地分类及质量评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报, 2007,31(1):85-89.
[11]	中国林学会. 造林规划设计[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 1985.

立地因子	分级标准
立地因子	1	2	3	4
海拔/m	<500	≥500
坡度	<5°	5°~15°	≥15°
坡向	阳坡	半阳坡	半阴坡	阴坡
坡位	上坡	中坡	下坡
土层厚度/cm	<40	≥40

标准地号	优势木高/m	海拔/m		坡度/(°)			坡向				坡位			土层厚度/cm
标准地号	优势木高/m	<500	≥500	<5	5~15	≥15	阴坡	半阴坡	半阳坡	阳坡	上坡	中坡	下坡	<40	≥40
1	18	1	0	0	0	1	0	1	0	0	0	1	0	1	0
2	29	0	1	0	1	0	0	1	0	0	1	0	0	1	0
3	27	0	1	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	1
4	24	1	0	0	1	0	1	0	0	0	0	1	0	1	0
5	14	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	1	1	0	0	0	1
6	31	1	0	1	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	1
?	?	?	?	?	?	?	?	?	?	?	?	?	?	?	?
83	20	0	1	1	0	0	0	0	1	0	1	0	0	0	1

项目	偏相关系数	显著性(sig.)
海拔	0.844	<0.001
坡度	0.093	0.536
坡向	0.324	0.026
坡位	0.293	0.460
土层厚度	0.435	0.002

指标	项目	类目	得分值
海拔/m	<500	X₁₁	10.1741
	≥500	X₁₂	5.3678
土层厚度/cm	<40	X₂₁	6.4837
	≥40	X₂₂	9.0582
坡向	阴坡	X₃₁	4.1137
	半阴坡	X₃₂	4.0901
	半阳坡	X₃₃	3.6524
	阳坡	X₃₄	3.6857
坡位	上	X₄₁	5.0638
	中	X₄₂	4.9411
	下	X₄₃	5.5369
坡度/(°)	<5	X₅₁	0.3126
	5~15	X₅₂	-0.2941
	≥15	X₅₃	0.0064

项目	立地类型
项目	Ⅰ	Ⅱ	Ⅲ
得分值	24.6899~29.1955	20.1842~24.6899	<20.1842
立地质量评价	优	中	差