Research on Undergrowth Plant Diversity in Larix Principis-rupprechtii Plantation with Different Thinning Levels —Taking Longxing Forest Farm of Guandishan in Shanxi Province as an Example

doi:10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2017.01.010

Abstract

Abstract:

Thinning is one of the important technical measures of forest management and also an important way to improve and maintain forest diversity and sustainability.Therefore,thinning and fixed-point observation which can clarify the impacts the thinning operations have on undergrowth diversity,the difference which different thinning intensities make in undergrowth diversity and the effects the different thinning intensities have on the duration and dynamic change of plant diversity,which can also reveal the impacts the management activities have on the formation of forest diversity and the role in maintaining mechanism and have important theoretical and practical significance.In this paper,through a series of different thinning intensity tests and a 6a fixed observation in Larix principis-rupprechtii plantation in Longxing Forest Farm,using plant species composition,species diversity index and community similarity index of Sorensen to analyze and reveal the difference which different thinning intensities made on the Larix principis-rupprechtii plantation undergrowth species composition and its influence on the plant species diversity and its dynamic change.Results suggest that thinning can significantly increase the undergrowth plant diversity.The plant species increased as the thinning was enhanced.In addition,thinning can also increase species diversity of undergrowth plants significantly.There are significant differences between the thinned and the unthinned.The difference of species diversity under different thinning intensities is also obvious.Medium and heavy thinning had more significant influence.After thinning for 6a,plant species of undergrowth plants and diversity index continued to increase and the thinning effect was still significant.Compared to the control stands,the mutual plant and similarity coefficient of undergrowth plants were significantly lower.The mutual plant and similarity coefficient would be lower if there was greater difference in thinning intensity.

Key words: Larix Principis-rupprechtii plantation, thinning effect, undergrowth plants, plant diversity, duration of effect

CLC Number:

S718.5
X176

LIU Hongyan, CHENG Dongli, LIU Jie, ZHAO Yu, ZHANG Yunxiang, GUO Jinping. Research on Undergrowth Plant Diversity in Larix Principis-rupprechtii Plantation with Different Thinning Levels —Taking Longxing Forest Farm of Guandishan in Shanxi Province as an Example[J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2017, 0(1): 50-56.

Figures/Tables 10

Tab.1

Tab.2

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

Fig.6

Tab.3

Tab.4

References 27

[1]	Houston M . Biological diversity,soil,and economics[J]. Science, 1993,262:1676-1680. doi: 10.1126/science.262.5140.1676 pmid: 17781786
[2]	Odum E P. Basic Ecology[M]. Philadelphia: Saunders College Publishing, 1983.
[3]	Mcnaughton S J . Diversity and stability[J]. Nature, 1988,333:204-205. doi: 10.1038/333204a0
[4]	Glowka L, Burhenne G F, Synge H , et al. A Guide to the Convention on Biological Diversity[M]. Cambridge. UK:IUCN-The World Conservation Union.The Burlington Press, 1994.
[5]	陈凤娟, 谷建才, 黄冬梅 , 等. 不同间伐强度对华北落叶松人工林林下植物多样性的影响研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2008(11):169-173.
[6]	周志庭, 李增利, 徐国巧 . 不同间伐强度对华北落叶松人工林林下植被生物多样性影响的研究[J]. 山东林业科技, 2013(2):45-47.
[7]	段劼, 马履一, 贾黎明 , 等. 抚育间伐对侧柏人工林及林下植被生长的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2010(6):1431-1441.
[8]	柏广新, 张命军 . 不同抚育间伐强度对长白山硬阔叶林林下植物多样性的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2011(12):27-29.
[9]	王祖华, 李瑞霞, 王晓杰 , 等. 间伐对杉木人工林林下植被多样性及生物量的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2010(12):2778-2782.
[10]	李瑞霞, 马洪靖, 闵建刚 , 等. 间伐对马尾松人工林林下植物多样性的短期和长期影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2012(5):807-812.
[11]	任立忠, 罗菊春, 李新彬 . 抚育采伐对山杨次生林植物多样性影响的研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2000(4):14-17.
[12]	孙广贵, 张命军 . 不同强度间伐对长白山天然林林下植物多样性的影响[J]. 森林工程, 2011(5):13-19.
[13]	秦燕燕, 蒋斌, 曹秀文 , 等. 间伐强度对白龙江林区云杉人工林下植物多样性及其更新的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2014(4):599-606.
[14]	张宏芝, 白庆红, 徐成立 , 等. 间伐对华北落叶松人工林林下植被的短期影响[J]. 林业资源管理, 2010(6):40-44.
[15]	林平, 刘勇, 李国雷 , 等. 间伐强度对华北落叶松人工林植被物种多样性的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2006(8):158-161.
[16]	杨育林, 李贤伟, 王海明 , 等. 抚育间伐对川中丘陵区柏木人工林生长和植物多样性的影响[J]. 山地学报, 2015(2):199-207.
[17]	龚固堂, 牛牧, 慕长龙 , 等. 间伐强度对柏木人工林生长及林下植物的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2015(4):8-15.
[18]	陈东莉, 郭晋平, 杜宁宁 . 间伐强度对华北落叶松林下生物多样性的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2011(4):37-38.
[19]	Histomo T, Takenari I . Responses of community structure,diversity,and abundance of understory plants and insect assemblages to thinning in plantations[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2010,259(3):607-613. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.11.019
[20]	马履一, 李春义, 王希群 , 等. 不同强度间伐对北京山区油松生长及其林下植物多样性的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2007(5):1-9.
[21]	刘红梅, 王祖华, 关庆伟 , 等. 间伐对杉木和马尾松人工林生长及植物多样性的影响[J]. 林业科技开发, 2010(3):33-37.
[22]	Simpson E H . Measurement of Diversity[J]. Nature, 1949,163:688. doi: 10.1038/163688a0
[23]	Shannon C E W . The Mathematical Theory of Communication[M] Chicageo: University of Illinois Press, 1949
[24]	Pielou E C . The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections[J]. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 1966,238(13):131-144.
[25]	臧润国, 刘静艳, 董大方 , 等. 林隙动态与森林生物多样性[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 1999: 9-37.
[26]	于立忠, 朱教君, 孔祥文, 等. 人为干扰(间伐) 对红松人工林林下植物多样性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2006(11):3757-3764.
	YU L Z, ZHU J J, KONG X W , et al. The effects of anthropogenic disturbances(thinning)on plant species diversity of Pinus koreansis plantations[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2006,11:3757-3764.
[27]	毛志宏, 朱教君, 刘足根 , 等. 间伐对落叶松人工林内草本植物多样性及其组成的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2006(10):1201-1207.

地点	海拔/m	坡向	坡位	郁闭度	保留密度/(株/hm²)	间伐强度/%	间伐强度类型
	1760	半阴坡	中	0.93	5500	0
南介沟	1740	半阴坡	中	0.92	5200	0	对照(CK)
	1720	阴坡	中	0.90	5000	0
	1710	半阴坡	中	0.85	4500	12.3
丁羊沟	1730	阴坡	中	0.80	4350	20.4	弱度(L)
	1690	半阴坡	中	0.78	4000	23.5
	1760	阴坡	中上	0.70	3800	27.5
五叶沟	1740	半阴坡	中	0.68	3720	30.3	中度(M)
	1750	半阴坡	中	0.65	3500	34.4
	1720	阴坡	中	0.63	2800	40.6
李山沟	1740	半阴坡	中	0.62	2700	41.3	重度(H)
	1710	半阴坡	中	0.60	2500	43.6

时间	相似系数			共有种数
时间	M/H	M/L	H/L	M/H	M/L	H/L
间伐后1年	89.66	89.64	79.52	39	35	33
间伐后3年	89.58	87.36	76.40	43	38	34
间伐后6年	97.09	86.60	86.00	50	42	43

时间	相似系数			共有种数
时间	L	M	H	L	M	H
间伐后1年	75.06	76.71	69.23	26	28	27
间伐后3年	77.78	68.35	56.79	28	27	23
间伐后6年	71.79	56.79	59.52	28	23	25