石梅湾3种植物叶片与其群落凋落物C,N,P生态化学计量特征研究

doi:10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2020.04.010

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

研究植物叶片和凋落物碳(C)、氮(N)、磷(P)含量和计量比对阐明植物群落生理过程及维持生态系统养分平衡至关重要。以石梅湾青皮林、木麻黄林和红树林为研究对象,通过测定建群种叶片和凋落物C,N和P含量,并分析其化学计量学特征与差异。结果表明:1)3种植物叶片C,N,P含量均显著高于凋落物(P<0.05),相反,其化学计量比显著低于凋落物;2)3种植物叶片N,P的养分再吸收效率表现为P(44.49~62.63%)大于N(18.96~34.37%),说明对P元素的养分再吸收能力较强;3)3种植物叶片N:P比值依次为青皮(16.03)、木麻黄(15.18)和拉关木(8.04),说明青皮生长倾向于受P限制,木麻黄生长倾向于受N和P共同限制,拉关木生长倾向于受N限制。研究结果可为海岸带森林生态系统的可持续发展提供科学依据。

关键词: 植被类型, 凋落物, 养分质量分数, 生态化学计量特征

Abstract:

It is important to study the contents and quantitative comparisons of carbon(C),nitrogen(N) and phosphorus(P) in plant leaves and litters.In order to elucidate plant community physiological processes and maintain nutrient balance in the ecosystem,this paper is infended for the study of wanning city vatica Forest,casuarina forests and mangroves.By measuring the C,N,and P in the leaves and their community litters of Vatica mangachapoi,Casuarina equisetifolia,and Laguncularia racemosa,the stoichiometric characteristics and differences of C,N,and P in the leaves and their communities of three kinds of plants are analyzed.The results show that the contents of C,N and P in the leaves of the three plants are significantly higher than those of litters(P<0.05).On the contrary,their stoichiometric ratios are significantly lower than those of litters.The nutrients resorption efficiencies of N and P are different,ranging in 18.96%~34.37%,and 44.49%~62.63%,respectively.Among them,P is larger than N,indicating that the nutrient reabsorption capacity of element P is strong.The ratio of N:P of the three plants was V.mangachapoi(16.03)>C.equisetifolia(15.18)>L.racemosa(8.04).The V.mangachapoi tend to be restricted by phosphors(P),C.equisetifolia tends to be restricted by phosphors(P) and nitrogen(N),and the L.racemosa tend to be restricted by nitrogen(N).The results can provide scientific basis for the sustainable development of forest ecosystem in coastal zone.

Key words: vegetation types, litter, nutrient concentration, ecological stoichiometry characteristics

中图分类号:

S718.5

陈毅青, 陈宗铸, 陈小花, 雷金睿, 吴庭天, 李苑菱. 石梅湾3种植物叶片与其群落凋落物C,N,P生态化学计量特征研究[J]. 林业资源管理, 2020, 0(4): 66-73.

CHEN Yiqing, CHEN Zongzhu, CHEN Xiaohua, LEI Jinrui, WU Tingtian, LI Yuanling. A study on Ecological Stoichiometric Characteristics of C,N and P in three kinds of plant leaves and their community litters in Shimeiwan of Hainan island[J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2020, 0(4): 66-73.

图/表 6

图1

表1

表2

图2

图3

表3

参考文献 41

[1]	Vitousek P. Nutrient cycling and nutrient use efficiency[J]. The American Naturalist, 1982,119(4):553-572. doi: 10.1086/283931
[2]	LI Hailiang, XU Fuli, WANG Weiling, et al. Seasonal variations in carbon,nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations and C:N:P stoichiometry in the leaves of differently aged Larix principis-rupprechtii Mayr.plantations[J]. Forests, 2017,8(10):373.DOI: 10.3390/f8100373. doi: 10.3390/f8100373
[3]	马任甜, 方瑛, 安韶山. 云雾山草地植物地上部分和枯落物的碳、氮、磷生态化学计量特征[J]. 土壤学报, 2016,53(5):1170-1180.
[4]	刘万德, 苏建荣, 李帅锋, 等. 云南普洱季风常绿阔叶林演替系列植物和土壤C、N、P化学计量特征[J]. 生态学报, 2010,30(23):6581-6590.
[5]	贺金生, 韩兴国. 生态化学计量学:探索从个体到生态系统的统一化理论[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010,34(1):2-6. doi: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.01.002
[6]	曾德慧, 陈广生. 生态化学计量学:复杂生命系统奥秘的探索[J]. 植物生态学报, 2005,29(6):1007-1019. doi: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2005.6.006
[7]	向云西, 陈胜魁, 潘萍, 等. 马尾松叶片—凋落物—土壤的碳、氮、磷化学计量特征[J]. 森林与环境学报, 2019,39(2):120-126.
[8]	Han Wenxuan, Fang Jingyun, Guo Dali, et al. Leaf nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry across 753 terrestrial plant species in China[J]. New Phytologist, 2005,168(2):377-385. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01530.x pmid: 16219077
[9]	张书齐, 许全, 姚海荣, 等. 海南岛海岸带木麻黄和厚藤叶片碳、氮、磷含量及其化学计量特征[J]. 植物研究, 2020,40(2):224-232.
[10]	盘金文, 郭其强, 孙学广, 等. 不同林龄马尾松人工林碳、氮、磷、钾养分含量及生态化学计量特征[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020,26(4):1-11.
[11]	王鑫, 罗雪萍, 字洪标, 等. 青海森林凋落物生态化学计量特征及其影响因子[J]. 草业学报, 2019,28(8):1-14.
[12]	关梦冉. 亚热带3种林分叶片及凋落物可溶性有机物含量及CNP化学计量特征[D]. 合肥:安徽农业大学, 2019.
[13]	任运涛, 徐翀, 张晨曦, 等. 贺兰山青海云杉针叶C、N、P含量及其计量比随环境因子的变化特征[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2017,31(6):185-191
[14]	Huang Xiaobo, Liu Wande, Su Jianrong, et al. Stoichiometry of leaf C,N and P across 152 woody species of a monsoon broad-leaved evergreen forest in Pu’er,Yunnan Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2016,35(3):567-575
[15]	万芳, 蒙仲举, 党晓宏. 荒漠草原建群种及其枯落物的C、N、P生态化学计量特征[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2020,48(2):29-33.
[16]	安卓, 牛得草, 文海燕, 等. 氮素添加对黄土高原典型草原长芒草氮磷重吸收率及C:N:P化学计量特征的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2011,35(8):801-807. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2011.00801
[17]	郑洋, 于格, 钟萍丽, 等. 基于土地利用变化和生态系统服务的海岸带生态安全综合评价——以胶州湾为例[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018,29(12):4097-4105.
[18]	黎洁. 广西北仑河口红树林植物种群动态与生态化学计量特征研究[D]. 桂林:广西师范大学, 2017.
[19]	钟春柳, 黄义雄, 张巧, 等. 平潭4种主要防护林碳、氮、磷化学计量特征与碳氮储量研究[J]. 西南林业大学学报, 2016,36(2):96-102.
[20]	白雪娟, 曾全超, 安韶山, 等. 黄土高原不同人工林叶片-凋落叶-土壤生态化学计量特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016,27(12):3823-3830.
[21]	张萍, 章广琦, 赵一娉, 等. 黄土丘陵区不同森林类型叶片-凋落物-土壤生态化学计量特征[J]. 生态学报, 2018,38(14):5087-5098. doi: 10.5846/stxb201707051215
[22]	董鸣. 陆地生物群落调查观测与分析[M]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 1996: 3-18.
[23]	NY/T 2017-2011,植物中氮、磷、钾的测定[S].
[24]	NY/T 2421-2013,植株全磷含量测定钼锑抗比色法[S].
[25]	Elser J J, Fagan W F, Denno R F, et al. Nutritional constraints in terrestrial and fresh water food webs[J]. Nature, 2000,408(6812):578-580. doi: 10.1038/35046058 pmid: 11117743
[26]	朱义, 谭贵娥, 何池全, 等. 盐胁迫对高羊茅(Festuca arundina-cea) 幼苗生长和离子分布的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2007,27(12):5447-5454.
[27]	秦玉芝, 陈珏, 邢铮, 等. 低温逆境对马铃薯叶片光合作用的影响[J]. 湖南农业大学学报:自然科学版, 2013,39(1):26-30.
[28]	李鑫, 曾全超, 安韶山, 等. 黄土高原纸坊沟流域不同植物叶片及枯落物的生态化学计量学特征研究[J]. 环境科学, 2015,36(3):1084-1091.
[29]	郑跃芳, 钟全林, 程栋梁, 等 .亚热带 4 种林木幼苗的碳氮磷含量及其化学计量比特征[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2017,23(2):379-383.
[30]	Elser J J, Sterner R W, Gorokhova E, et al. Biological from genes to ecosystems[J]. Ecology Letters, 2000,3(6):540-550. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2000.00185.x
[31]	Reich P B, Oleksyn J. Global patterns of plant leaf N and P in relation to temperature and latitude[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2004,101(30):11001-11006. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0403588101 pmid: 15213326
[32]	Sabine G. N:P ratios in terrestrial plants:variation and functional significance[J]. New Phytol, 2004,164(2):243-266 doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01192.x
[33]	Zeng Dehui, Chen Guangsheng. Ecological stoichiometry:a science to explore the complexity of living systems[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2005,29(6):1007-1019.
[34]	Elser J J, Aaharya K, Kyle M, et al. Growth rate-stoichiometry couplings in diverse biota[J]. Ecology Letters, 2003,6:936-943. doi: 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00518.x
[35]	李明军, 喻理飞, 杜明凤, 等. 不同林龄杉木人工林植物-凋落叶-土壤C、N、P化学计量特征及互作关系[J]. 生态学报, 2018,38(21):7772-7781. doi: 10.5846/stxb201708221509
[36]	胡伟芳, 章文龙, 张林海, 等. 中国主要湿地植被氮和磷生态化学计量学特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014,38(10):1041-1052. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2014.00098
[37]	潘复静, 张伟, 王克林, 等. 典型喀斯特峰丛洼地植被群落凋落物C:N:P生态化学计量特征[J]. 生态学报, 2011,31(2):335-343.
[38]	刘文飞, 樊后保, 袁颖红, 等. 杉木人工林凋落物量动态对氮沉降增加的响应. 中山大学学报:自然科学版, 2011,50(4):106-112.
[39]	沈芳芳, 吴建平, 樊后保, 等. 杉木人工林凋落物生态化学计量与土壤有效养分对长期模拟氮沉降的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2018,38(20):7477-7487. doi: 10.5846/stxb201711242095
[40]	黄小波, 刘万德, 苏建荣, 等. 云南普洱季风常绿阔叶林152种木本植物叶片C、N、P化学计量特征[J]. 生态学杂志, 2016,35(3):567-575.
[41]	Wen Xiaxie, Zhu Kunjie, Du Huina. A review of ecological stoichiometry characteristics of carbon nitrogen and phosphorus in wetland ecosystems[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2014,864, 1311-1315.

植物群落-建群种	项目类型		养分质量分数
植物群落-建群种	项目类型		C		N	P
青皮林 (青皮Vatica mangachapoi)	叶片	(478.00±5.51)A		(17.80±0.06)Aa		(1.80±0.00)Aa
青皮林 (青皮Vatica mangachapoi)	表层凋落物	(448.63±14.65)Bb		(14.43±1.46)Ba		(0.69±0.07)Ba
木麻黄林 (木麻黄Casuarina equisetifolia )	叶片	(515.50±48.59)A		(16.70±0.51)Ab		(1.52±0.24)Ab
木麻黄林 (木麻黄Casuarina equisetifolia )	表层凋落物	(479.22±29.98)Ba		(11.71±1.01)Bb		(0.57±0.14)Bb
红树林 (拉关木Laguncularia racemosa)	叶片	(503.00±8.79)A		(9.03±0.42)Ac		(0.98±0.01)Ac
红树林 (拉关木Laguncularia racemosa)	表层凋落物	(383.50±1.64)Bc		(5.65±0.36)Bc		(0.53±0.10)Bb

植物群落-建群种	养分再吸收效率
植物群落-建群种	N	P
青皮林(青皮Vatica mangachapoi)	18.96	61.88
木麻黄林(木麻黄Casuarina equisetifolia)	29.87	62.63
红树林(拉关木Laguncularia racemosa)	34.37	44.49

项目	指标	C	N	P	C:N	C:P	N:P
叶片	C	1
	N	0.01	1
	P	0.22	0.923^**	1
	C:N	0.14	-0.983^**	-0.853^**	1
	C:P	0.02	-0.982^**	-0.961^**	0.957^**	1
	N:P	-0.01	0.999^**	0.908^**	-0.988^**	-0.976^**	1
表层凋落物	C	1
	N	0.503^**	1
	P	0.07	0.475^**	1
	C:N	-0.456^**	-0.972^**	-0.403^**	1
	C:P	0.26	-0.22	-0.907^**	0.146	1
	N:P	0.448^**	0.574^**	-0.411^**	-0.628^**	0.649^**	1