林业资源管理 ›› 2018, Vol. 0 ›› Issue (3): 133-140.doi: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2018.03.023
收稿日期:
2018-03-06
修回日期:
2018-04-23
出版日期:
2018-06-28
发布日期:
2020-09-20
作者简介:
罗芬(1979-),男,湖南湘乡人,副教授,博士,研究方向:森林旅游、旅游业环境管理与旅游业企业家精神,Email:基金资助:
LUO Fen(), LI Xueli, LI Shuxian, HE Jiawen
Received:
2018-03-06
Revised:
2018-04-23
Online:
2018-06-28
Published:
2020-09-20
摘要:
森林结构属性是林业科学研究的热点之一,从公众偏好视角研究森林结构属性有利于优化森林旅游产品的供给侧结构,扩大生态公共产品的供给。基于Science Direct数据库,以国外森林结构属性公众偏好为研究对象,在对其研究历程、研究方法、案例地分布总结的基础上,基于“人-地-环境”森林结构属性公众偏好影响框架,综述了社会人口学特征、地理区域、人类活动及情境环境等四大因素对公众森林结构属性偏好影响的研究进展,展望了未来我国森林结构属性公众偏好研究的可能路径。
中图分类号:
罗芬, 李雪丽, 李书献, 何嘉文. 国外森林结构属性公众偏好的影响因素研究进展[J]. 林业资源管理, 2018, 0(3): 133-140.
LUO Fen, LI Xueli, LI Shuxian, HE Jiawen. Literature Review on Factors of Public Preference on Forest Structure Attributes[J]. FOREST RESOURCES WANAGEMENT, 2018, 0(3): 133-140.
[1] | 习近平. 习近平谈治国理政[M]. 北京: 外文出版社, 2014. |
[2] | 罗芬, 钟永德. 三十年旅游发展对国有林场的影响研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2014,34(5):17-22. |
[3] | 2017年森林旅游游客量达13.9亿人次[EB/OL]. (2018-01-29)[2018-02-20]. http://www.forestry.gov.cn/main/72/content-1071394.html. |
[4] | 习近平. 决胜全面建成小康社会夺取新时代中国特色社会主义伟大胜利[N]. 人民日报, 2017-10-19 (002). |
[5] | 罗芬, 黄清麟, 张寅, 等. 森林旅游资源分类与调查及评价研究进展[J]. 世界林业研究, 2014,27(6):8-13. |
[6] | 罗芬, 张安妮, 曲佩宇, 等. 欧洲儿童森林环境教育模式研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报:社会科学版, 2016,10(6):56-61. |
[7] | Lee T R. Perceptions,Attitudes and Preferences in Forests and Woodlands[M]. Edinburgh:Forestry Commission, 2001. |
[8] |
Luo F, Moyle D B, Bao J, et al. The role of institutions in the production of space for tourism:National Forest Parks in China[J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 2016,70(9):47-55.
doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.05.021 |
[9] |
Giergiczny M, Czajkowski M, ŻYlicz T, et al. Choice experiment assessment of public preferences for forest structural attributes[J]. Ecological Economics, 2015,119(11):8-23.
doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.07.032 |
[10] | Edwards D, Jay M, Jensen F S, et al. Public preferences for structural attributes of forests:towards a pan-European perspective[J]. Forest Policy & Economics, 2012,19(3):12-19. |
[11] | Jensen F S. Landscape managers' and politicians' perception of the forest and landscape preferences of the population[J]. Forest& Landscape Research, 1993,1(1):79-93. |
[12] | Hunziker M, Felber P, Gehring K, et al. Evaluation of Landscape Change by Different Social Groups[J]. Mountain Research & Development, 2008,28(2):140-147. |
[13] | Japelj A, Mavsar R, Hodges D, et al. Latent preferences of residents regarding an urban forest recreation setting in Ljubljana,Slovenia[J]. Forest Policy & Economics, 2016,71(10):71-79. |
[14] | Gundersen V S, Frivold L H. Public preferences for forest structures:a review of quantitative surveys from Finland,Norway and Sweden[J]. Urban Forestry &Urban Greening, 2008,7(4):241-258. |
[15] |
Avolio M L, Pataki D E, PPincetl S, et al. Understanding preferences for tree attributes:the relative effects of socio-economic and local environmental factors[J]. Urban Ecosystems, 2015,18(1):73-86.
doi: 10.1007/s11252-014-0388-6 |
[16] | Herzog T R, Kirk K M. Pathway curvature and border visibility as predictors of preference and danger in forest settings[J]. Environment& Behavior, 2005,37(5):620-639. |
[17] | Coles R W, Bussey S C, Randrup T B, et al. Urban forest landscapes in the UK-progressing the social agenda[J]. Landscape & Urban Planning, 2000,52(2-3):181-188. |
[18] | Junge X, Schüpbach B, Walter T, et al. Aesthetic quality of agricultural landscape elements in different seasonal stages in Switzerland[J]. Landscape & Urban Planning, 2015,133(133):67-77. |
[19] |
EevaKarjalainen. Scenic preferences concerning clear-fell areas in Finland[J]. Landscape Research, 1996,21(2):159-173.
doi: 10.1080/01426399608706483 |
[20] | Ueda H, Nakajima T, Takayama N, et al. Landscape image sketches of forests in Japan and Russia[J]. Forest Policy & Economics, 2012,19(3):20-30. |
[21] | Brush R. Perceiving Environmental Quality:Research and Applications[J]. Environmental Science Research, 1976,9:47-58. |
[22] |
Knopf R C. Human behavior,cognition,and affect in the natural environment[J]. Behavioural Brain Research, 1993,55(55):101-107.
doi: 10.1016/0166-4328(93)90012-F |
[23] | Brunson M W, Reiter D K. Effects of Ecological Information on Judgments about Scenic Impacts of Timber Harvest[J]. Journal of Forestry, 1996,90(1):31-41. |
[24] |
Lindhagen A. An approach to clarifying public preferences about silvicultural systems:a case study concerning group selection and clear-cutting[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 1996,11(1-4):375-387.
doi: 10.1080/02827589609382950 |
[25] | Hallikainen V. The Finnish Wilderness Experience[R]. Finland:The Finnish Forest Research Institute, 1998. |
[26] | Van Den Berg A, Vlek C, Coetherier F. Group differences in aesthetic evaluation of nature development plans:a multilevel approach[J]. J.Environ.Psychol, 1998,18(2):141-157. |
[27] | Tahvanainen L, TyrväInen L, Ihalainen M, et al. Forest management and public perceptions-visual versus verbal information[J]. Landscape & Urban Planning, 2001,53(1):53-70. |
[28] | Edwards D, Jay M, Jensen F, et al. Deliverable D2.3.3:Public preferences for silvicultural attributes of European forests[R]. Projet Eforwood, 2014. |
[29] | Groot R D, Ramakrishnan P S, Van de Berg A, et al. Cultural and amenity services[C]// Hassan R M,Scholes R,Ash N.Ecosystems and Human Well-Being,Volume 1:Current State and Trends:Cultural and Amenity Services. Washington DC:IslandPress,Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005. |
[30] | Kaplan R, Kaplan S, Brown T. Environmental preference:a comparison of four domains of predictors[J]. Environment & Behavior, 1989,21(5):509-530. |
[31] | BallingJ D, Falk J H. Developmentof visual preference for natural environments[J]. Environment& Behavior, 1982,14(1):5-28. |
[32] | TryväInen L, Pauleit S, SeelandK. Benefits and Uses of Urban Forests and Trees[M]. Springer Berlin Heidelberg:Urban Forests and Trees, 2005:81-114. |
[33] | Kardell L. Clearcuts-do they have to be ugly?[J]. Sveriges Skogsvardsforbunds Tidskrift, 1978,76(3/4):385-433. |
[34] |
Silvennoinen H, Pukkala T, Tahvanainen L. Effect of Cuttings on the Scenic Beauty of a Tree Stand[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 2002,17(3):263-273.
doi: 10.1080/028275802753742936 |
[35] |
Ribe R G. The aesthetics of forestry:What has empirical preference research taught us?[J]. Environmental Management, 1989,13(1):55-74.
doi: 10.1007/BF01867587 |
[36] |
Hultman S G. Public judgement of forest environments as recreation areas,1:Judgement on site or from photos?[J]. Molecular Brain Research, 1997,48(1):107-125.
doi: 10.1016/s0169-328x(97)00088-0 pmid: 9379830 |
[37] |
ForanB, WardleK. Transitions in land use and the problems of planning:a case study from the mountainlands of New Zealand[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 1995,43(2):97-127.
doi: 10.1016/S0301-4797(95)90101-9 |
[38] |
Soliva R, Hunziker M. Beyond the visual dimension:Using ideal type narratives to analyse people’s assessments of landscape scenarios[J]. Land Use Policy, 2009,26(2):284-294.
doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.03.007 |
[39] | Jensen F S, Koch N E. Measuring forest preferences of the population—a Danish approach[J]. SchweizerischeZeitschrift Fur Forstwesen, 1998,151:11-16. |
[40] | Schraml U, Volz K R. Do species matter? Valuable broadleaves as an object of public perception and policy[J]. Valuable Broadleaved Forests in Europe, 2009,1(1):213-236. |
[41] | Mudrak L Y. Urban resident’s landscape preferences:A method for their assessment[J]. Urban Ecology, 1983,1(7):91-123. |
[42] | Val G D L F D, Hermann M S. Visual quality:An examination of a South American Mediterranean landscape,Andean foothills east of Santiago (Chile)[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2014,13(2):261-271. |
[43] |
Karjalainen E. Scenic preferences concerning clear-fell areas in Finland[J]. Landscape Research, 1996,21(2):159-173.
doi: 10.1080/01426399608706483 |
[44] | Becker R H. Opinions about clear-cutting and recognition of clear-cuts by forest recreation visitors[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 1983,17(2):171-177. |
[45] | Brunson M, Shelby B. Assessing recreational and scenic quality:How does New Forestry rate[J]. Journal of Forestry, 1992,90(7):37-41. |
[46] | Brown T C, Daniel T C. Modeling forest scenic beauty:Concepts and application to ponderosa pine[R]. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, 1984:1-35. |
[47] | Hörnsten L, FredmanP.On the distance to recreational forests in Sweden[J]. Landscape & Urban Planning, 2000,51(1):1-10. |
[48] | Rametsteiner E, Kraxner F. Europeans and their forests:what do Europeans think about forests and sustainable forest management?[R]. Vienna:Ministerial conference on the protection of forest in Europe, 2003. |
[49] | Axelsson-Lindgren C. Forest aesthetics[M]. Helsinki:Multiple-use forestry in the Nordic countries,METLA,The Finnish Forest Research Institute, 1995:279-294. |
[50] | Ward-Thompson C, BoydF.Review of research in landscape and woodland perceptions,aesthetics and experience[M]. Edinburgh:Landscape Design and Research Unit, 1998. |
[51] |
Hay R. Sense of place in developmental context[J]. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 1998,18(1):5-29.
doi: 10.1006/jevp.1997.0060 |
[52] |
Hoffenberg P H. Landscape,Memory and the Australian War Experience,1915-18[J]. Journal of Contemporary History, 2001,36(1):111-131.
doi: 10.1177/002200940103600105 |
[53] | PræstholmS, Jensen F S, Hasler B, et al. Forests improve qualities and values of local areas in Denmark[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2002,1(2):97-106. |
[54] | Bell S. Landscape pattern,perception and visualisation in the visual management of forests[J]. Landscape & Urban Planning, 2001,54(1):201-211. |
[55] |
Silvennoien H, Alho J, et al. Prediction models of landscape preferences at the forest stand level[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2001,56(1):11-20.
doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00163-3 |
[56] | Jensen F S. Changes in the forest preferences of the Danish population from 1977 to 1994[J]. Danish Forest and Landscape Research Institute, 1997,15(26):213-236. |
[57] | Palmer J F. Stability of landscape perceptions in the face of landscape change[J]. Landscape & Urban Planning, 1997,37(1-2):109-113. |
[1] | 黄晓园, 叶远辉, 张卓亚, 王红崧, 陈雅琳. 基于MSPA普者黑自然保护区森林景观破碎化研究[J]. 林业资源管理, 2020, 0(3): 44-51. |
[2] | 李志明. 基于分层的典型猴欢喜天然林特征分析[J]. 林业资源管理, 2020, 0(3): 72-77. |
[3] | 刘代超, 李晓松, 杨广斌, 齐鑫淼, 王建和. 全球森林分布产品中国区域可靠性比较分析[J]. 林业资源管理, 2020, 0(2): 173-180. |
[4] | 史浩伯, 李路, 陆海燕, 孙桂丽, 王桂华. 胡杨等4种植物在新疆地区的适生区预测[J]. 林业资源管理, 2020, 0(1): 38-46. |
[5] | 吴恒, 朱丽艳, 王海亮, 刘智军. 乔木树种分布格局和林分空间结构分析[J]. 林业资源管理, 2020, 0(1): 54-61. |
[6] | 唐志明, 刘炳响, 屈宇. 河北太行山区典型水土保持林乔木层生物量及碳储量研究[J]. 林业资源管理, 2020, 0(1): 102-107. |
[7] | 郭子豪, 孙晶琦, 巩合德. 滇中地区主要灌丛生物量空间分布格局特征[J]. 林业资源管理, 2019, 0(6): 55-61. |
[8] | 刘豪, 徐冬梅. 山西省乔木林碳汇动态趋势研究[J]. 林业资源管理, 2019, 0(6): 49-54. |
[9] | 闫平, 徐健楠, 菊花, 浩仁塔本, 郭丰毅, 慕晓炜, 阮超越. 云南三江并流地区树轮宽度指数与NDVI关系研究[J]. 林业资源管理, 2019, 0(6): 42-48. |
[10] | 汤浩藩, 许彦红, 艾建林. 云南省森林植被碳储量和碳密度及其空间分布格局[J]. 林业资源管理, 2019, 0(5): 37-43. |
[11] | 王奕茹, 李际平, 曹小玉, 李琪媛. 杉木-闽楠混交林林分结构与生产力功能耦合关系研究[J]. 林业资源管理, 2019, 0(2): 54-59. |
[12] | 王荷, 周军, 覃鑫浩, 张贇. 哈巴雪山高山松径向生长对气候变化的响应[J]. 林业资源管理, 2019, 0(2): 67-72. |
[13] | 朱雅丽, 张绘芳, 张景路, 地力夏提·包尔汉. 基于无人机遥感的胡杨地上生物量估测模型构建[J]. 林业资源管理, 2019, 0(2): 80-87. |
[14] | 蒋丽伟, 张家琦, 赵一臣, 赵永雷. 北京山区典型林分生长季叶面积指数动态变化[J]. 林业资源管理, 2019, 0(2): 132-136. |
[15] | 梅浩, 彭泰来, 桂来庭. 广东省国家级公益林质量评价[J]. 林业资源管理, 2019, 0(2): 15-20. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||